12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHIts Not About the Horsepower
Leading reported evidence
Replace shift ****...."
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I'd say...."Shhhh...don't tell anyone, but I changed the shift ****....".
Leading evidence: 'Replace shift ****...."' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace shift ****...."' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T020439Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Had my first DE yesterday at the Mission Raceway in Mission, BC and it was a blast. Highly recommended.
I learned something really important too. Being the fastest car is not about the horsepower. The advanced group contained a new GT3 RS, GT3's, GT2's, several 911 Turbos, 997's, an F430, a 1999 bone stock NA 996 and two 944's. The NA 996 performed very well, upper third of the pack and I was impressed. The fastest car? A 944!
Two things made the difference: obviously driver skill was #1 and #2 was tires. The 944 and the 996 both were shod with Hoosier racing tires.
I talked at length with the 996 owner. He has 85,000 miles on the car, with about 30-40 track days on it. It's also his DD. No major engine problems, just a starter, MAF and O2 sensor in 13 years of ownership.
I know its been said here many times, but I learned that if you want to go faster, invest in your driving skills (and maybe some tires).
JA-MON... makes you look at cars in a whole new light...what I used to think was a nice car is not the same as now....I see some ratty 1/2 painted dirtbag cars and think "holy crap, that thing is awesome"
because I am looking at the suspension, lightweighing, and all around track fastness of the thing...then some shiny new car rolls up and I think.... MEH.... whatever
Was the 944 black? I suspect that was Ian M in his 951. It's *heavily* modified.
A little bit of talent, a lot of practice, and total familiarity with your machine will make a guy *very* fast indeed.
How was the weather by the way?
Ha! No snow. This is the Wet Coast of Canada. The itty, bitty part of Canada that remains essentially snow-free. Remember the Vancouver 2010 Olympics?
It has been raining with few breaks since last fall. A very wet year and slow start to spring/summer. Friday was exceptional, clear skies, around 20 C. Perfect track day weather.
Karlooz has a superspec 996(110k miles- no rms and still kicking butt) ie 2500 lb full raceprep- it can beat 98% of stock street gt3's if equal drivers up in norcal. Other 2% just a few tenths faster. Like one mentioned it's driver skill. Jrgordonsenior is even faster in his spec 996. Had a 99 996- never had an issue with car other then one rms in the 1st 3 months of ownership- great car. Sold car to get 6 gt3 with 47k miles. Mike
I used to find it quite amusing when I used to autox an MR2-Spyder and the Viper guys would come down. They'd all get beat really bad by my 125hp roadster and then come over and ask me what I did to it. I'd say...."Shhhh...don't tell anyone, but I changed the shift ****....".
I swear you could actually hear the "shrinkage"....
Agree on driver #1 and setup #2 (tires in this case) being the big advantages. My 944 track car is faster than any of my street cars in spite of double the engine horsepower. Also, a better driver in my 944 can easily wring out a couple more seconds on a two-mile track at this point.
I wouldn't mind checking out Mission Raceway at some point. So far, I've only spent track time at PR and PIR in our area.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.