5 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCam deviation from IMS?
Leading reported evidence
Adjust sproket
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I manually adjusted my sproket to get another -2.x degrees.
Leading evidence: 'Adjust sproket' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'shop who did the install had blinders' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Adjust sproket' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
With one of the values at 8 degrees, it's needed the wear pads replaced now for quite some time.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Porsche didn't use hydraulic tensioners when they assembled the engine, they used a solid tool, so I compensated for this and other wear by advancing the sproket slightly.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
More than likely the shop who did the install had blinders on and just did the bearing OR the customer chose not to change out the wear pads.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'd also recommend dropping the oil pan at your next oil service to inspect for debris.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
As Skip said, it's highly unlikely the installation caused the deviation (unless they screwed something up royally, which in that case it probably wouldn't be running or running correctly).
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Porsche didn't use hydraulic tensioners when they assembled the engine, they used a solid tool, so I compensated for this and other wear by advancing the sproket slightly.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
5 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T020439Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Thinking about doing my variocam pads this winter or next. I called my indy shop to just see what they would quote me, I was curious. I told the service advisor my cam deviation numbers which are -8 on bank 1 and -4.5 on bank 2. He wanted to know all about the IMS, when it was done, what paperwork I have etc, and said they would need to drop the transmission and examine the IMS before taking on the job. His implication was the IMS install caused the cam deviation numbers. He quoted me 4 hours labor just doing diagnostics.
I'm kind of spooked by this now. The IMS was done by the prior owner, maybe 4-5k miles ago. It's a roller bearing solution, I have photos of the PO's install but nothing else documented.
You guys think inspecting the IMS is necessary? Car has 104k miles, the engine whines a little more than most at low revs and I'm pretty sure the whine is from the old variocam pads (I talked to the IMS vendor about that noise and he said definitely not IMS). It's a little rough at idle but no other issues and no engine codes.
I'm no Porsche mechanic but a couple years ago I did my own IMSB (roller bearing) replacement along with the bank 1 and IMS chain tensioners. About a year ago I did the bank 1 variocam pads and short chain. My deviations were -7 and -1, now they are -2 and -1 and stable*. I don't see how the IMSB could cause increased deviation unless it's badly worn, as in wobbly bad, but that would be obvious. Weak tensioners allow more chain slack increasing deviation so you could start there for a slight improvment. Bank 1 and the IMS tensioners are easy to do, bank 2 a little harder. Maybe ask for your indy's opinion. They've been superceded over the years too. Increasing deviation is cumulative wear: the chains (all five) and sprokets, chain guides (all seven) wear, and the tensioners weaken so at over 100k miles you've got your share of wear.
* I will add that doing the above work only brought my bank 1 deviation down to about -4.x. I manually adjusted my sproket to get another -2.x degrees. Porsche didn't use hydraulic tensioners when they assembled the engine, they used a solid tool, so I compensated for this and other wear by advancing the sproket slightly.
You don't mention your year model but since you are talking about cam pads I assume you are talking about a 5 chain m96. On a 5 chain m96 the cam timing tool assures the Exhaust cam is properly timed but does NOT ensure the Intake cam is properly timed, and the Intake cam is where the deviation numbers come from..
For the Intake cam to be properly timed , the two small chains/gears have to be 7 pins apart ( on the dots on the gears) , the twp small chains cannot be worn, and the Intake cam timing pointer cannot be bent...
So if you want perfect cam deviations I would suggest also replacing the two small chains while doing the cam pads..
For the IMS Bearing to have any effect on cam deviations it would have to be failing ( and would have metal in the oil filter or on a UOA ) .The wear on the two longs chain will be compensated for by the timing tool adjustment slots on the Exhaust cam gear..
Thanks. Yes, it's a 5 chain.
I understand the shop's concern about the PO's IMSB work, but I really don't think it's contributing to the cam deviation on this car. No metal that I could see in the oil filter. If the cam deviation numbers were unstable, or if I had any other symptoms, I'd take it more seriously.
Hearing that the shop wanted $600 in diagnostic fees before giving a quote was clarifying. I'm going to set this aside until next winter, or until I get a bank 1 code. My plan is to DIY it - drop the engine and do the four pads plus cam-to-cam chains.
As Skip said, it's highly unlikely the installation caused the deviation (unless they screwed something up royally, which in that case it probably wouldn't be running or running correctly). With the mileage the car has, the wear pads are done. It's hard to put a mileage on when they need to be replaced, but it's on average every 60k miles. I've seen them totally shot at 25k and perfect at 100k, so there are lots of variables.
More than likely the shop who did the install had blinders on and just did the bearing OR the customer chose not to change out the wear pads. With one of the values at 8 degrees, it's needed the wear pads replaced now for quite some time.
If the wear pads aren't the issues, then it could be chain stretch, cams were not timed properly or the sprocket slipped, or there is an issue with the IMS bearing or the IMS shaft itself.
I'd also recommend dropping the oil pan at your next oil service to inspect for debris. You likely will find bits of the wear pads in there you should clear out.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.