16 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHHow Many 911 items can you find
Leading reported evidence
Test "
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Test "' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test "' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
16 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T113718Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
No but I can take a better pic. It was a rendering of a 911. A concept that I liked, that actually looked feasible with most stuff. Send me an email and I'll shoot it over.
Alright, I'll play.
1. Left below 911 schetch
2. 911 Owner's Manual at 10 o'clock midway to center
3. 911 desktop screen in center 12 o'clock
4. 911 desktop screen in 1 o'clock position
5. Lady in red 9 o'clock close to center (it will pass for a 911)
6. Small zip lock with drain plug in it
7. Duct tape at 3 o'clock position. Definitely 911 (just ask Hurdi)
8. Book at 4 o'clock position
9. Porsche book next to Owners' Manual at 10 o'clock
Some of it is a stretch but I give up. That's what I am: an early giver upper.
Haha sweet. Yup pretty good. Definitely a picture hawk. Missed 2 items but that may be due to bad resolution of the picture.
Sketch is the actual copy of the design sketch by pinky lai. 996 designer
Let me know if you want the answer for final two or try to guess at it.
You guys all suck at this picture hawking thing. You missed a bunch of obvious ones. Each keyboard clearly has 911 on it (the center one has two number pads, so 2X 911), and each keyboard clearly has P-O-R-S-C-H-E on it.
