24 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHSo, my CEL has been off for about 10 days now....>
Reported or suspected cause
changeover valves
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
I had the same codes last fall, in my case it was the changeover valves.
So, my CEL has been off for about 10 days now....>
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'changeover valves' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'changeover valves' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Check /fixing the secondary air system' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
So, my CEL has been off for about 10 days now....>
Check every single fuse
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I checked every single fuse under the dash, no response when triggering with the Durametric.
So, my CEL has been off for about 10 days now....>
Disconnect ) will not cause the system
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
A vacuum leak "anywhere" in the system (short of the SAI lines being totaling disconnected) will not cause the system to malfunction and therefore correcting the leak will not fix a problem with the system.
So, my CEL has been off for about 10 days now....>
Replace sai
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The SAI has been replaced with a new to me one, 86k miles, but it was clean and spun smoothly.
So, my CEL has been off for about 10 days now....>
Check codes
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Yep - you're right in the zone for the valve issue - should get a decent Porsche shop to check the codes when they next pop up - their machine can identify more specifically where the issues lie, rather than the broad brush ODBII codes.
So, my CEL has been off for about 10 days now....>
Check o2 adaaption numbers
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
check your o2 adaaption numbers on a 99 its the tra and fra numbers (you will need a pst2 piwis or im sure the durametric or snapon scaneer can see similar numbers)
So, my CEL has been off for about 10 days now....>
Disconnect ) will not cause the system
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
A vacuum leak "anywhere" in the system (short of the SAI lines being totaling disconnected) will not cause the system to malfunction and therefore correcting the leak will not fix a problem with the system.
So, my CEL has been off for about 10 days now....>
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
24 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
3 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Outcome without a verified action link
Timely post as my check engine light came on about two weeks a go and noticed no difference in the car.
My CEL had been on for about 3-4 weeks, & went off like twice for a period of
2-3 days during that time.
It has now been off, like I say for about 10 days straight (no, it is not burned out, lol).
I have the K&N cold air kit & I seem to remember the codes I was pulling
had to do with "secondary air pump" or something.
Just thought I would toss this out & see if anybody has any (pertinent)comments to the situation.
- Cam
What age is the vehicle?
Typicaly on vehicles over 5 yrs of age you see the small valves in the secondary air system start to stick. (Due to oil contamination)
These valves control the flow of air into the exhaust system for a cleaner burn - so it's an emissions issue only, not anything that will effect engine performance.
As the valves stick and unstick, the codes for the CEL and come and go.
Remedy is usually replacement of the valves - which are of course a pain to get to!
Hope that helps.
Chris.
Yep - you're right in the zone for the valve issue - should get a decent Porsche shop to check the codes when they next pop up - their machine can identify more specifically where the issues lie, rather than the broad brush ODBII codes.
Cost was $600 for a fix last time I had it done, parts and labor (mostly labor)
Chris.
Timely post as my check engine light came on about two weeks a go and noticed no difference in the car. Had it checked out and the OBD reader said it pertained to OEM emissions control "something". Went ahead and reset the light.
Drove two weeks and the light came on again yesterday. Again...no difference in car performance....didn't get around to reset it. Then this morning I started it up and no CEL?
What you describe below may be what I'm experiencing....
Any DIY directions on checking /fixing the secondary air system?
ok lil misinforamtion going on here.
which faults do you have p0410 p0411 are secondary air faults for both banks
if you have one bank then you have issues, the most likely case of this fault is a vacum leak,
a vaccum leak any where in the system can cause a drop in vacum preventing the full opening of the mechincal shutoff valve hence your faults.
step 1
check your o2 adaaption numbers on a 99 its the tra and fra numbers (you will need a pst2 piwis or im sure the durametric or snapon scaneer can see similar numbers)
if the are positive you have a vacum leak and need to check each component in the system for holding of vacum. start with the vacum canister the tend to crack as they get old
and fwiw I have never seen a bad mechincal shut off valve on a 9x6 car and only 2-3 bad eletrical valves people have no idea how the system works and like to throw lots of parts at hoping something will fix it
Brad,
appreciate your perspective, but I have had 2 986 cars, one 98 and one 99 where the valve replacement was a permanent fix for this exact issue.
I did have the local independant Porsche shop confirm the fault location using their Porsche diagnostic system before work commenced.
First set of secondary air system valves I did myself, which was a huge pain, took way too long, and resulted in me swearing I'd never do it again!
Second car - I had the independant shop do the work - same parts, same result.
Obviously - as I said - you do need to have a better diagnosis than just the ODB codes, otherwise you cannot be sure exactly where the fault lies.
But based on my experience - the valves have been the issue, and not the vacuum leak.
Hence the advice.
The other point to note here, is that the fault code comes and goes - which indicates a fault which can 'clear' itself.
This is difficult for a vacuum leak to do - but follows the MO for the sticking valves.
My local independant shop confirmed that they see this many times in 'older' 9x6 models.
Chris.
Great info, thanks guys!
If I recall correctly it indeed was both p0410 & p0411.
At one point there were 4 codes thrown...all seemed relatively similar
in description.
Keep it coming..........
Often, these codes are caused because the vacuum line from the vacuum reserve is not connected. It can also be an electrical problem with the changover valve, or a bad air changeover valve. The vacuum line for the electric changeover valve is so small that identifying it as a vacuum leak with a vacuum gauge is difficult. You codes indicate that both banks are experiencing probelms so it is probably a single, main componant.
Here is what I would do. Assuming that the pump is working.
With the engine running, remove the vacuum line for the electric changeover valve that goes to the vacuum reserve canister. There should be constant vacuum. If not, the other end of the hose is disconnected and your air changeover valve will not open.
Next, on a cold engine, remove the other vacuum line from the air changeover valve. Start the car, at which time the pump should start. You should be getting a vacuum in the disconnected line until the pump shuts off. If not,. problem is with the electric changeover valve.
On the other hand, you can immediately jump to the end and remove the larger hose from the non return valve. On a cold engine, the pump should start and there should be air blowing out of the hose. When the pump shuts off, the blowing will stop completely and NO AIR should be coming back out of the valve. If this is the case, then you can safely assume that everything before this point back to the pump is working as designed.
The function of the system is simple. There is constant vacuum to the change over valve to which a vaccum line to the air valve is connected. When off, the changeover valve does not allow vacuum to get to the air valve. When on, (pump running) the valve activates and allows vacuum to get to the air valve and allows air to pass into the manifold through the one way valve.
Bad air changover valve is a very common cause.
Here is a writeup on the system:
http://www.renntech.org/forums/index...10184&hl=p0410
Jim
what year is your car ?
410 and 411 means that both banks are not seeing air,
step 1 check your fuses
step 2 make sure the pump comes on when you cold start the car
step 3 your gonna needa vacum pump
check the one way valve small black and white nipple going into the intake note its orentaon and reinstall in proepr direction it should hold vacum one way and allow free air to pass the other
check the vacum canister see if it holds vacum if it does then move on to
checking the electric valve, first jump the conacts with 12+ and ground do you hear it click if you hear it click its probaly good
vacum check the valve does it hold? now apply + and - valve clicks vacum should drop
valve is working properly.
vacum check the changeover valve it should hold vacum
thats about the basics
really easier with a pst or piwis so you can see fuel trim and see if it is a vacum leak 9/10 tiems it is.
secondary air is so often misdiagnosed, I see lots of people shot gun parts onto cars becasue they have no idea how it works or how to fix it. And I stand by my previous statement, i have never seen a faulty changeover valve on a 9x6 car and i assure you I Have seen plenty with those faults
If the fuse had failed, then the code would not reset itself - correct?
If the pump had failed, then the code would not reset itself - correct?
If the vacuum canister didn't hold vacuum, then the code would not reset itself - correct?
The key would appear to be that the codes come and go - suggesting a fault that comes and goes, rather being than a persistant issue.
The CEL is resetting itself, it's not being reset by Cam.
Or am I missing something?
So an intermittant issue would tend to suggest sticking or faulty valve(s), rather than any of the above.
But then I'm biased because I've had two out of my three 9x6 cars have this issue when they've reached this sort of age / mileage, and I have no clue how the magic tubey bits around the big mechanical whirry thing work.
1 - Secondary air injection pump
2 - Air change-over valve
3 - Electric change-over valve
4 - Non-return valve
5 - To the cylinder heads
6 - Vacuum reservoir
7 - To the intake air system
Cam, let us know if you get this one fixed - and if I've wasted my money shot-gunning parts into my cars to fix my problems.
I can then pass the bad news on to Sid and Jim as well.
Chris.
Thanks Brad & Chris,
Yes the codes are resetting themselves....I am not doing it.
The light STILL is off so we will see what happens in the future.
Thanks again for the time spent!!
- Cam
ps....If you are asking me, the car is a 1999 C2.
the code could reset itself with a vacum leak, depedning on conditions temperature ect.
if you get in the car and go before the secodary air is done running it will abort and not throw and faults and possibly shut off the lamp
also if your car is an 01 it could be as simple as a reflash of the dme there was a bulletion on that 0303
A vacuum leak "anywhere" in the system (short of the SAI lines being totaling disconnected) will not cause the system to malfunction and therefore correcting the leak will not fix a problem with the system. The air changeover valve is operated on a low vacuum of 5 in-hg. If your car had a vacuum leak that reduced the engine vacuum to that level, the engine would not even run.
Additionally, simply because you have a high negative or high positive LTFT does not mean you have a vacuum leak or that anything is even wrong with your engine. Identifying a vacuum leak by looking at the fuel trims is, at best, a guess and there are much better and easier ways to determine a leak. Even your STFT will balance out when the O2 sensors activate, eliminating any suggestion of a general leak. Fuel trim is only an indicator if you have a baseline of readings for that specific engine. as many engines run normally with a high positive or negative LTFT..
I'm pulling this one back from the dead bc, well..I have a 99 C2 6mt that is displaying these codes (0410, 0411) along with "signal implausible" after each code, on my Durametric. The SAI has been replaced with a new to me one, 86k miles, but it was clean and spun smoothly. Testing the plug into the SAI what signal am I looking for? I'm not getting any voltage at all on either terminal when the car is cold started. I had a slight water incident a few months back, dipping the back left corner in a gully, water did cover the SAI and rusted it inside.. could the changeover valve have fried? Where is it? Searched first and it brought me to this thread.. lets get some new info going
3/98 Carrera2 204,850 miles.. original
There's a thread on this topic
here
. I had the same codes last fall, in my case it was the changeover valves.
If you trigger the SAI pump with the Durametric and don't get any action, I'd look at whatever that has for a fuse (and maybe a relay) - it uses a lot of power.
I checked every single fuse under the dash, no response when triggering with the Durametric. Any tips on where to find the relay in the car? Or possibly a hidden fuse box.. there was no fuse indicated for the SAI system that I could find.
located that big honkin 40a fuse..blown wide open, probably right after my SAI pump locked up. Replaced it, and successfully activated SAI thru the Durametric! I hooked up the old frozen up SAI (that I had stripped down and rebuilt) and it worked too.. now I have a spare I guess
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.