31 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHLet's talk about brake fluid
Leading reported evidence
Use ate 200
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Use ate 200' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace twice as often (once a year) compared' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Why have I been told that racing brake fluid should be changed twice as often (once a year) compared to street fluid (every two years)?
Run off track, the $50 added expense seems comical
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
And let me also say that if you have *ever* been at the track when someone has boiled their fluid and run off track, the $50 added expense seems comical to consider.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Is it something to do with the fluid or mostly because if you are running racing fluid, you�re likely going to want to flush it more often anyway.
Run off track, the $50 added expense seems comical
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
And let me also say that if you have *ever* been at the track when someone has boiled their fluid and run off track, the $50 added expense seems comical to consider.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
31 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T052503Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
What do you use and why?
I am cheap, and generally don't track my car, so I go with Super DOT 4.
There is a part of me that wants to use racing fluid. I won't say what part.
TRW Grand Prix 600 seems to be cheap and racy. What say you all?
Lots of choices, lots of opinions. I've settled on two that I put in all my cars, trucks and motos.
ATE Typ 200
Goes in my trucks, motos, and cars that wont see frequent track days. $14/liter prime shipped on Amazon.
Castrol SRF
on my Porsches and other performance cars. Much more pricey at $67/liter shipped, but still in pretty cheap for once a year or so.
Typ 200
boils at. 536� F dry (388.4� F wet), more than enough for any open track day if the system is freshly bled. Doesn't absorb water as quickly as many other racing fluids, which often compromise longevity for great dry temperatures. I don't have a problem keeping this fluid in my vehicles with several year change intervals and no bleeds if there not seeing track duty.
SRF
boils at 590� F dry, better, but where it really shines is that it is less hygroscopic (absorbs water more slowly), and when it does, it still has an outstanding wet boiling point of 518� F. Bottom line is that means less bleeds, fewer changes, and much less chance of surprise fade if you have a track day on a car that wasn't freshly bled.
One liter is plenty for a full purge of the system with usually enough left over for a bleed as well. Also, when comparing prices, note that many fluids are sold in 500mL bottles, both of these are 1L
Am I understanding the concept of brake fluid.
Fluid for street use:
negative - gets too hot on track days and boils
positive - resistant to moisture bluid over longer period of time
Fluid for high performance
negative - short life span, susceptible to moisture
positive - doesn't break down under extreme heat, safer for track use
What do wise people use for DD doing a couple DEs a year?
That's basically correct, but a bit more complicated. Street fluid that isn't too old and freshly bled is usually o.k. for most street tire track days... Old, unbled fluid will still work fine on the street, but likely boil under heavy track braking, cutting your track day pretty short (best case scenario).
But the track or street fluid dilemma is exactly why Castrol SRF is worth the ~$70/liter. Performance equal most racing fluids, longevity of the best regular fluids.
Plus a super high wet boiling point to allow it to work great even if it does absorb moisture! Good stuff. Spend the $70 and have the best street/track fluid there is.
Note that SRF's wet boiling point is higher than Pentosin's dry boiling point...
Most know this, but essentially this is what happens that causes issues with brake fluid:
Pads contact rotors and generate lots of heat. Pistons contact pads. Fluid contacts pistons.
If fluid next to the pistons exceeds the boiling point, it, well, boils.
Boiling fluid creates air bubbles which remain, even after the fluid goes below boiling point.
Fluid is incompressible. Gas (as in air bubbles) is compressible. So when fluid boils, you get spongy brakes and lose a direct connection between pedal and pads.
As fluid ages, it absorbs moisture, reducing boiling point, aggravating the problem.
To address these issues, you bleed and flush...
Bleeding removes existing boil bubbles as well as the dirtiest, most contaminated fluid at the pad end of the hydraulic system, which absorbs moisture faster than in the middle of a brake line.
Flushing removes all old fluid, restoring dry fluid throughout. Assuming of course you use FRESH fluid from a SEALED container,... Take an open container off the shelf and it might have as much moisture as the fluid you are bleeding or flushing...
Has anyone ever used Porsche Classic Brake Fluid DOT4? (It says it's "formulated for all Classic Porsche models thru 2004", because, yes, our 996s are now "classics.") It's a lot cheaper than Castrol SRF, with
Pelican Parts selling it for $25 a liter
and
Suncoast Parts selling it for $20/liter
.
At that price, I'm assuming it's not for track-use.
As long as its foil seal is unbroken it should be fine. Humidity/moisture is what ruins brake fluid.
I spend too much on Endless rf650 but it feels great on the track/street so its worth it
Amazon
Amazon
Maybe, if it is in a tin can (test it, you can get a cheap brake fluid tester) if it is a plastic bottle, toss it...Plastic bottles can leach moisture through the plastic, and have a short shelf life..
Why have I been told that racing brake fluid should be changed twice as often (once a year) compared to street fluid (every two years)? Is it something to do with the fluid or mostly because if you are running racing fluid, you�re likely going to want to flush it more often anyway. Specifically talking about Castro�s SRF 600
It is more hygroscopic initially than lower grades of DOT brake fluid, I.e. the wet boiling point drops quicker.
In order to actually have the higher boiling temperature you want the fluid fairly fresh.
Not exactly...
Yes, many race-centric brake fluids have very high dry temps (fresh fluid), and markedly lower wet temps (older fluid). In addition, they tend to be even more hygroscopic then 'street' brake fluid (they turn from 'dry' to 'wet' more quickly). And flush intervals of not a year, but often a month, or even every event with many race fluids are called for.
SRF is a bit of an exception in the race fluid spectrum. It has very high dry
and
wet
temps, which is why it makes an excellent street/track fluid that does
not
require frequent flushing, because it retains high boil resistance even after being in the car a while and absorbing some moisture.
True race cars might need the absolute highest 'dry' boiling point, and they don't care much about wet. They'll just flush every time. And if it avoids boiling, it's the right solution. For our street/track cars, we want significantly increased dry temps, but even more importantly, significantly increased wet temps since we do not want to flush frequently.
Note that SRF 'wet' boiling point is still higher than Porsche OE fluid 'dry' boiling point. In other words, 'old' SRF is still less likely to boil than fresh OE fluid.
.
.
Porsche OE 2005+ Brake fluid, 55.9520.100
Dry Boiling Point: 500F. Wet Boiling Point: 329F
.
Another comparison chart..
That’s a comprehensive list so it looks like the value leaders are the ATe200 redline motul and stop tech but the Castrol srf is the performer but at 2x the price of the others
tough choice
Given the consumption cost for tires, brake pads & fuel for a few track days, let alone track fees, general wear and tear, safety equipment, etc., the extra $50 once a year for SRF fluid is even noticeable?
And let me also say that if you have *ever* been at the track when someone has boiled their fluid and run off track, the $50 added expense seems comical to consider.
Yep. You pay up. Not to mention make sure your fluid is brand new and fresh for every track day. Ran out of brakes once and will never let it happen again.
It wasn't some nefarious plot, and definitely not triggered by greenies...
DOT specifies specific color for different types of fluid to help prevent using the wrong fluid, much like they dye different fuels different colors
.
DOT 3, DOT 4, and DOT 5.1: Colorless to amber.
DOT 5 – Purple.
Hydraulic system mineral oil – Green.
.
Super Blue, which is DOT 4, is definitely not colorless to amber. Closer in color to a DOT 5, which it definitely is not. I'm pretty sure the color requirement existed long before they stopped importing Super Blue, it was more. matter of enforcing something that had been in place for a while but not monitored.
ATE Typ 200 is identical to Super Blue except for the golden color, which does conform to the standard.
I have been using RBF600. I flush before the season starts and then I bleed enough fluid after every track day to get fresh fluid into the calipers replacing that day's working fluid. I don't want to keep using fluid that has been cooking for hours. The fluid in the lines hasn't been exposed to extreme temperatures so should be in better condition. The drained fluid always looks a little off somehow. I figure that over the season I end up replacing the fluid twice, even though I don't do a complete flush in-season.
I have been told the rbf660 has slightly better pedal feel than rbf600 due to slightly less compression. I have also been told that Endless 650 is the best for pedal feel and temperature resistance with SRF just behind.
I not sure how old it is but it's more than 5 years.
Yup. You can see on the Ate Blue can where is says what standards in meets, it added "except blue colour".
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.