fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Exhaust upsize and downsize

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHExhaust upsize and downsize

Leading reported evidence

Use 2-inch (51mm), and downsize

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Okay, so I won't restrict the airflow by using a 2-inch (51mm), and downsize?

Exhaust upsize and downsize
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use 2-inch (51mm), and downsize' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use 2-inch (51mm), and downsize' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 11 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Use without the need of ear protection

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I�ve considered the gundo hack, but I would like to turn it off for highway use, without the need of ear protection.

Exhaust upsize and downsize
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use 2-inch (51mm), and downsize

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Okay, so I won't restrict the airflow by using a 2-inch (51mm), and downsize?

Exhaust upsize and downsize

Use without the need of ear protection

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I�ve considered the gundo hack, but I would like to turn it off for highway use, without the need of ear protection.

Exhaust upsize and downsize
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T172408Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hi! I am cosnidering a cutoff valve that�s vacuum actuated. My exhaust is 54mm, but the size of the pipe I can get for the vacuum actuated one is 63.5mm. Is it possible to upsize the exhaust for about 30cm, and then downsize back to original? Will this effect something? Will look something like this, with the Y splitter for the cutout on the wide part: �... ____ ��.�.. �� ��____�� (disregard the dots) Thanks, Marius

POST 2Original post

Shouldnt be an issue. The bigger problem may be finding a long enough straight section in the exhaust.

POST 3Original post

Yes you can do that, but the cutout can be smaller than the exhaust and still get the same result if that makes any difference.

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thank you! If nobody tries to warn me, I�ll give it a shot.

POST 5 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Okay, so I won't restrict the airflow by using a 2-inch (51mm), and downsize? I�m planning on having it closed for the most part, but would like a �fun button� for the weekends )

POST 6Original post

The only advice I�d give is try to get the highest quality components - stainless steel, galvanized, coated, whatever. Even the bolts, gaskets, etc. Because those valves can corrode and stop working after a short time due to rust. The better the components, the longer it will last.

POST 8 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks a lot Mike! I�ve considered the gundo hack, but I would like to turn it off for highway use, without the need of ear protection. I�ll check that the parts are stainless steel, thanks for the tip. I�ve already figured that I need the vacuum actuated ones, because the electric motors would fail due to the heat, I suppose. Can�t find too much information on cutout valves on 996. Is it just hard to make fit, or is it a big no-no? thanks, Marius

POST 9Original post

That�s the best part of the Gundo/ Fister: on the highway, the car isn�t loud. It�s not loud anytime the throttle is relatively closed. WOT is a different story though. I would see if someone that has the hack can give you a ride. It�s not like a muffler-delete, which is LOUD. It�s more like the PSE. I would research the PSE option and try to reproduce that if you can. That�s the Porsche factory option you are looking to do.

POST 10Original post

Mike is right! i did the Gundo hack and you only notice it when really on the throttle and it is not so obnoxious (in the cab) that you need any type of hearing protection. It's just a nice, throaty roar

POST 11Original post

I hardly notice my Fister modded mufflers till I step on it.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.