fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Anyone have a "touchy" volume control?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHAnyone have a "touchy" volume control?

Reported or suspected cause

just dirty/oxidized contacts

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

If the issue is just dirty/oxidized contacts, this _might_ be sufficient without having to perform surgery on the radio.

Anyone have a "touchy" volume control?
Frequently discussed work

Run =schizophrenic volume

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

-engine running=schizophrenic volume

Anyone have a "touchy" volume control?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'just dirty/oxidized contacts' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'just dirty/oxidized contacts' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Run =schizophrenic volume' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 9 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Run =schizophrenic volume

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

-engine running=schizophrenic volume

Anyone have a "touchy" volume control?
Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run =schizophrenic volume

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

-engine running=schizophrenic volume

Anyone have a "touchy" volume control?
Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

just dirty/oxidized contacts

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

If the issue is just dirty/oxidized contacts, this _might_ be sufficient without having to perform surgery on the radio.

Anyone have a "touchy" volume control?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T181445Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I have a BE6634 radio/nav in my 05 TTS and the volume is all over the place; touch it just a bit and it goes from 40db to 140 in one click and vice-versa. I've researched for hours and found nothing much. I've learned what a potentiometer is......that was interesting. That would be a physical failure..as that is the physical back part of the volume dial riding along essentially a circuit. It's not that....b/c the volume works fine with the vehicle off. So it's programming. I turned the "Audio Pilot" off and it improves it but in no way resolves it. 1. this ever happen to anyone? 2. if the "audio pilot" is off (or even if it's left on really) why would the stereo care if the vehicle is running or not? So essentially: vehicle off =works perfect, turn ignition on=schizophrenic At a loss. Thanks Joe

POST 2Original post

I think it probably had a rotary encoder rather a potentiometer. If it turns 360 degrees, it is a rotary encoder. You can clean it although how you get at it is something I can't help you with. There's a guide that shows how to clean them here: http://theartofsound.net/forum/showt...volume-control You might also want to look at http://beckerautosound.com/porsche/2865218

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

You mean the volume button is not supposed to travel beyond 360....physically? thanks for the referral!

POST 4Original post

If there's any gap at all between the shaft and the faceplate with the **** removed, you could try shooting some electrical contact cleaner in while turning the **** back and forth. If the issue is just dirty/oxidized contacts, this _might_ be sufficient without having to perform surgery on the radio. This is the case with nearly all of the rotary controls in my wife's Murano, and it's maddening - turning the fan down slightly often as not results in turning it up some random amount. It's really frustrating, but not to the point that I've bothered trying to fix it yet. Lazy has a lot of inertia, it turns out.

POST 5 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 12738507

Thank you. I was going to do exactly that until i saw that it works flawlessly and consistently with the car ignition off.

POST 6Original post

Oh, crap, I missed that small but seemingly important clause: "b/c the volume works fine with the vehicle off." Reading is hard. Wow, what a mind screw.

POST 7Original post

Is the issue present in any key positions when the car is off? Since the 996 radio will work with no key at all, is the radio consistently normal when working with no key vs. when the key is in the "on" position but acts up when the engine is started? What's the voltage look like when the engine is running? Maybe the voltage regulator is failing and you're putting too much (or maybe too little?) power through the system when the car is running, and the volume circuit is especially sensitive to the incorrect voltage...

POST 8Original post

Quotes source post: 12738406

That wasn't really clear, sorry. I meant to ask if the volume control has "hard stops" at each end, or is it one that can just spin and spin. If it is the former, then it is a potentiometer. If it is the latter, it is a rotary encoder. Not sure what to say about it working with the ignition off. I'd still try to clean it though.

POST 9 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 12738593

How do I measure that? I have a digital multimeter that I can't use to save my life. -car off no key= works perfect -car ignition one click (not turning engine over) =works perfect -engine running=schizophrenic volume -there is a speed and ambient noise sensitive software called "Audio Pilot" with this unit. Turning this off helps but in no way resolves the issue. schizophrenic volume is described as barley touch **** and volume jumps 100db either way up or down, unpredictable. That's not even one click of the volume **** and it jumps like that. Then in the next moment one can spin the same **** 360 degrees and it ignores you. Thanks again Joe

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.