20 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHSacrilegious ideas.....
Leading reported evidence
Replace measurements
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Just make sure you get downforce change measurements for when people ask...
Leading evidence: 'Replace measurements' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace measurements' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I wouldn't use the same deck or existing articulated wing.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
20 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T184158Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
So I realize this will offend the Porsche gods..
I am half way through a 3,000 mile round trip up to visit family in PA, and at my moms house I remembered that I had an old wing off of a car I had when I was like 20...
Loved that car... took the original 2.5L 4 cylinder out and put in a 3800SC engine from a wrecked GrandPrix. Changed it from boring blue to interesting red..... Anyway... when the car rusted out so badly that it was hopelessly gone underneath, and the strut towers needed replaced and the floor boards... and and.. I scrapped it.
But I saved the wing.
And just for fun....
Not so bad actually.
Perfect width. Though of course would need lots of fab work to be well integrated.
Though now I have fully offended the Porsche gods.... I hope I don't get struck by lightning on the way home.
And yeah, I put the wing inside the car for the trip back to Florida. Never know when it might come in handy...
That's a pretty good idea. I do have fond memories of the car that wing came from.. as well as the contortionist girlfriends from that era also. So evoking those memories on my man-cave wall isn't a bad idea at all.
If there is one car community that embraces any and all modifications it is the Fiero community. One of the things I miss about that group are all the crazy mods people did to them. Usually not the best quality ones, but just insane levels of creativity.
Cheap cars, and lots of common parts exchange across GM led to some really fun stuff.
I have thought about getting another one just to play with, but then I sit in one and remember just how cheaply they are made... so the memories are better left alone.
I wouldn't use the same deck or existing articulated wing. If I did decide to use it, I would need a whole different deck lid setup with rams that raise straight up. Otherwise it would look really silly because it would be tilted forward when raised. so yeah you are right there for sure.
I am only half considering using the wing.
