Rennlist

Diagnosing maintenance receipt (RMS Related)

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

3 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHDiagnosing maintenance receipt (RMS Related)

Leading reported evidence

Replace rms and the ims "flange seal" only

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Looks like they replaced the RMS and the IMS "flange seal" only.
Original post Read captured discussion
Diagnosing maintenance receipt (RMS Related)

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace rms and the ims "flange seal" only' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace rms and the ims "flange seal" only' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 3 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace rms and the ims "flange seal" only

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Looks like they replaced the RMS and the IMS "flange seal" only.
Original post Read captured discussion
Diagnosing maintenance receipt (RMS Related)

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

3 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T122219Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I need help diagnosing what was performed on this receipt. From what I can tell it was just the seals for RMS and IMS and not a fix to the IMS. This was performed in 2008. Is there any pause for concern on this vehicle? From what I have researched the RMS leak is common and based on this receipt was fixed. I am mainly wondering if this should be concerning from an IMSB perspective. The vehicle is 2002 with 60k miles now. Thanks

POST 2Original post

Looks like they replaced the RMS and the IMS "flange seal" only. Maybe partial warranty work because of the N/C on removing trans, ect.?

POST 3Original post

if the IMS was replaced you'd see mention of it and a charge of $7-$800 for the part

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.