15 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHQuestion regarding LN Engineering Bearing
Leading reported evidence
Replace single row
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
In these instances we replaced the single row with the IMS Solution.
Leading evidence: 'Replace single row' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Fill gap within the do-it-yourself (diy) market' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I designed the Pelican Parts replacement bearing kit in order to fill a gap within the do-it-yourself (DIY) market.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Since ay #1 the Classic single row has had a 50K mile recommended replacement.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
This kit is designed to replace the factory bearing with a very similarly manufactured bearing (with an improved seal and updated center bolt).
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Most of the cost of IMSB replacement is labor.Not a big deal if it coincides with clutch change timing .If you have an automatic....
Use stock intermediate shaft bearing cover as a way
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The Pelican Parts kit uses the stock intermediate shaft bearing cover as a way to reduce the total cost of the kit, though we recommend if you have the older style single round gasket cover you replace this with the newer version from Porsche which is less likely leak.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T130754Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Sorry if this is a repost, either I couldn't find it or I must have misread the search.
Does the LN Engineering Bearing need to be replaced or serviced? I bought a car that already has it done. It's not the solution, just the retrofit. The shop that did this is a known reputable porsche shop, and they aren't aware of any service or replacement that it requires. However, I've been told by some on the forum that it does need replacement every 50k. Can someone verify this? I don't see anything about replacement on the LN engineering site.
Thanks very much, much appreciated.
BTW.. its a 3.6 rebore to 3.8 C4S that has the LN Engineering bearing.. not sure if single or double row.. also has RMS Seals done by the dealer as well.
I am having my RMS done soon because of a small leak. I was told by the previous owner without paperwork that the IMS was done. As the IMS will be accessible at that time is it easy to tell if it is the original or an upgrade without removing it? It's a 2000 996 tip.
Since ay #1 the Classic single row has had a 50K mile recommended replacement. The dual row has had a 75K mile recommended replacement.
The IMS Solution is permanent.
What are you saying Jake? If you change out the original IMSB to one of yours. You still recommend that the car goes back to you for another bearing after 50000 miles?
Here we only use the IMS Solution for single row cars. Single row cars do have the 50K service interval.
What I am stating is the only permanent retrofit is the IMS Solution; if anything else is used the bearing would require scheduled service 50K miles later if its a single row, or at 75K miles if its a dual row.
We have already re- retrofitted some of our earliest engines that started seeing retrofits 8 years ago. In these instances we replaced the single row with the IMS Solution. If I do this work, we carry out the re- retrofit labor for 1/2 price labor wise as long as the vehicle is still owned by our customer that paid for the first retrofit. The data we collect from these is very informative.
I am just looking on the LN engineering website.. sorry for another noob question.. but is it safe to assume that 97~2001cars use double row and all those 02~05 use single row?
The paper work from my car doesn't state single or double row
Please take a look at our
DIY Tech Article
in regards to the bearing. We sell the LN bearing, but we also sell our own, which you can read about in the tech article and
here
. Kit is good for either Single or Dual Row IMS.
I've highlighted below the difference between the bearings from the article below for you as a quick reference:
LN Engineering Retrofit Kit
The LN Engineering IMS Retrofit kit is also an easy-to-install upgrade kit that can be installed with the engine still in the car and provides almost bulletproof reliability to this critical component. This kit costs about $600 and is available online from PelicanParts.com. The upgrade kit incorporates a custom ceramic hybrid bearing (see Figure 5), featuring precision Japanese-made tool steel races and genuine USA-made Timken sintered silicon nitride ultra-low friction roller *****. This bearing, combined with a beefier center stud and a custom-machined housing, ensures that the IMS problems inherent in the stock design are mitigated. The engine can be upgraded during a routine clutch job and is fairly easy to install thanks to the installation tools designed by LN Engineering specifically for this task.
Which Kit to Use?
I designed the Pelican Parts replacement bearing kit in order to fill a gap within the do-it-yourself (DIY) market. This kit is designed to replace the factory bearing with a very similarly manufactured bearing (with an improved seal and updated center bolt). I recommend that the bearing be swapped out each time a clutch replacement is performed (30,000–45,000 miles). The outer seal is not removed on the kit, instead an improved seal is installed, which should offer longer life than the factory original. Replacement bearings, O-rings, and parts will be available for customers who have already performed the swap at least once and already have the tools, spacers, and the improved center bolt. The Pelican Parts kit uses the stock intermediate shaft bearing cover as a way to reduce the total cost of the kit, though we recommend if you have the older style single round gasket cover you replace this with the newer version from Porsche which is less likely leak. While we include both style of gaskets in the kit including a replacement gasket for the older style covers, Porsche no longer supports this part.
The LN Engineering retrofit kit contains a stronger-than-stock center stud, a custom machined intermediate shaft end cover, and a special, custom-manufactured ceramic bearing, which is very expensive, but has much longer life under harsh conditions. The LN Engineering kit is considered to be the more robust kit and is designed primarily for shops that are installing the retrofit and need that extra guarantee for their customers. The extended-life ceramic bearing (see Figure 5) is only available at this time with the LN Engineering kit, and its inclusion is responsible for a large portion of the cost difference between the two kits.
-Luccia