fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Saying hi

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHSaying hi

Leading reported evidence

Check system needs

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Not tried pulling any fuses yet but have found info on here saying the add on loom ( about �80 I think) is the solution and think that the spoiler check system needs to be functioning to keep all systems in place , I'll get a loom at some point , hope this info is not too far off!

Saying hi
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Check system needs' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check system needs' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 12 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check system needs

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Not tried pulling any fuses yet but have found info on here saying the add on loom ( about �80 I think) is the solution and think that the spoiler check system needs to be functioning to keep all systems in place , I'll get a loom at some point , hope this info is not too far off!

Saying hi
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T155324Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hi all , here's my first pic of my 2002 996 c4. Had it 5 months and loving it, I'm in north wales not far from the Evo triangle so have seen a few great Porsches on their way there , not had any pics sadly.

POST 3Original post

Nice looking C4, love your wheels. How many miles?

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks , it has 74k on it , I've done about 2 k since owning so far.

POST 5Original post

Welcome. Very nice, personally like blue 996's. What color is interior? And I think your car has convinced me to update my front bumper cover first chance I get.

POST 6Original post

Welcome. Very nice car. Hope you enjoy it as much as I do!

POST 7Original post

Welcome and that is a beautiful car. What type of rear wing is that?

POST 8 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 12951664

thankyou, the interior is black leather black carpets , nice but carpets show very tiny spec!

POST 9 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 12951918

Thankyou very much , the kit was on when I bought the car so not sure on the spoiler , I have just bought the 996 essential companion book ( it's really good ) and there is a very similar one from sportec angled gt2 . Somebody with more knowledge than me ( not hard!) on these May know for sure.it does need the add on loom though to stop the spoiler warning coming on if I ever go over 75 ;-)

POST 10Original post

Quotes source post: 12952314

Nice car. Welcome to the board. Is it possible to take the fuse out of the spoiler warning or does that fuse govern other parts of the car?

POST 11 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 12953676

Not tried pulling any fuses yet but have found info on here saying the add on loom ( about �80 I think) is the solution and think that the spoiler check system needs to be functioning to keep all systems in place , I'll get a loom at some point , hope this info is not too far off!

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.