9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNew OEM Floor Mats. Poorer quality?
Leading reported evidence
Install driver side and have 1 pristine passenger side mat
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I only installed the driver side and have 1 pristine passenger side mat.
Leading evidence: 'Install driver side and have 1 pristine passenger side mat' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install driver side and have 1 pristine passenger side mat' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
So I guess we have to set now for this "like dealer installed for free" mats...
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I ordered a set of 2 Metropol Blue mats back in late 2017/early 2018 to replace the driver's mat that had a hole worn in it.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I will have to go look and compare to the original set I've yet to remove from the car.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T212127Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hello all,
Recently I have ordered a set of new OEM floor mats at the dealer. Part number 000-044-800-84-G10 (in my case G10 for being metropol blue)
My surprise was that, when I received them, they are not exactly like the original ones that came with the car. They seem a lower level in quality. The mat itself, seems to be a bit less thick than the original one, and the back is a vulcanized finishing, instead of the rubber mat in the old ones that we have.
I had read that, when you order only the set of 2, that was what you get, but I was expecting the set of 4 being exactly like the old ones
Do you know if there is any other different part number that match the old floor mats, or this is what we get now as new "updated part"?
Thanks for the reply
As I mentioned before, I had read from some online shop reviews, that now you can buy the set of 4 or just set of the front mats, and when you did so, it seemed that you received the mats of inferior quality. However it seems that is also the case when you order the set of 4.
I have even looked in the old Tequipment catalog, from 2004, and the part number is the same: 000.044.800.84 + color code
So I guess we have to set now for this "like dealer installed for free" mats...
I have a new set of Metropol Blue front mats that I ordered from Suncoast that have been sitting unopened for 2 years. I will have to go look and compare to the original set I've yet to remove from the car.
I ordered a set of 2 Metropol Blue mats back in late 2017/early 2018 to replace the driver's mat that had a hole worn in it.
That set matched the originals.
I only installed the driver side and have 1 pristine passenger side mat.
I'll have to see if the part number(s) is on the plastic bag.
Actually the backing is different.
The tops are identical and the driver's mat has endured ~30K miles of driving, so it has held up well.
Here's the backing of both. Old mat on top of new one
Thank you all for the photos!
It looks like the 000.044.800.53 is for the set of 2 and the 000.044.800.84 is for the set of 4
But as I see in the photos, all of them now have the "vulcanized" back instead of the rubber one. Also, the way that the velcro pad is attached, or even when you compare the top (the newers are a bit less thick)... definetely, they look cheaper
In MINI for instance, when you get the stock floor mats, they are like those with the vulcanized back. However, when you order the "premium mats" (Mini Yours) they are much thicker, with that rubber back like we used to have.
But it is what it is...
Thanks again!
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
