10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCryo Detailing
Leading reported evidence
Use baking soda blasting in the past (not
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I have used baking soda blasting in the past (not on cars) with great results...
Leading evidence: 'Use baking soda blasting in the past (not' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean ****' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Those with "OCD" be forewarned that it is pure cleaning ****!
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Problem is equipment starts around $10,K Common uses are cleaning barnacles off ship hulls & cleaning toxic mold in buildings.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Clean process is fascinating and the results are impressive
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
The science behind the cleaning process is fascinating and the results are impressive, but it isn't cheap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T091943Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I have seen cryo detailing done in just a few places around the country (FL is one) and was curious if it's really that rare of a process and whether anyone has had their underside detailed using this technique.
The science behind the cleaning process is fascinating and the results are impressive, but it isn't cheap.
Enjoy your weekend everyone!
Cryo detailing is essentially sand blasting, except you're using small particles of dry ice. You would use this in industry because you don't have to worry about disposing any abrsaive sand. There is a misconeption when people read that is is non abrsaive. I think people assume that means it's safe for paint, when infact it will remove paint. It's "non abrasive" because it won't remove the material underneath the paint, which makes it ideal for machined parts, but doesn't neccesarily mean it's ideal for painted parts. You obviously would be using a different set up and pressure for detailing, but it's good to know the tool you're using can cause serious damage.
You can see an example here
Dry Ice Blasting Demo - YouTube
We have one of these machines there is nothing better out there. Never thought to use it to detail the bottom of a car but it would be absolutely ideal for this. We use it to strip paint off historic buildings and wood mouldings without damaging the wood fiber.
You should consider this as a side business, specializing in high end care detailing. The YouTube videos I have seen of the results are very impressive.
I have used this to clean engine cases etc. It works great once you preclean thick greasy areas like where the oil filler tube commonly leaks.
Problem is equipment starts around $10,K Common uses are cleaning barnacles off ship hulls & cleaning toxic mold in buildings.
Yeah, did a bit of research and saw the prices of equipment and industrial applications.
Quite a novel approach, but it will only be a matter of time when the left wing bans them because of excessive CO2 emissions.
Go to YouTube and search "Cryo detail". There are a number of Porsche undercarriages being blasted.
Those with "OCD" be forewarned that it is pure cleaning ****!
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
