11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHWanted: U.S. spec M030 for 996 C2
Leading reported evidence
Replace back if the ride height is too low
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Plus you can change back if the ride height is too low.
Leading evidence: 'Replace back if the ride height is too low' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace back if the ride height is too low' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T122219Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Looking for the springs, shocks, swaybars and bushings for the U.S. specification M030 sports suspension. I know a lot of people end up going to lower/stiffer springs or coil-overs after realizing that the U.S. M030 is only a little stiffer than the standard setup and the same height. I live in an area that has very poor roads and driveways, and am thus forced to keep my car at the stock height.
Ofer,
The ROW M030 is only 20 mm lower in front and 10 mm lower at rear. You are better off getting this kit as it is a lot cheaper than buying individual US M030 parts at the counter. Unless, of course, you can find someone who just took off an entire US M030 setup and is willing to sell at a reasonable price.
Unfortunately, 20mm in the front is way too much for driving in the Hollywood Hills without scraping on every steep driveway. I hate scraping my car. I wish I could just go with H&R's, however they don't make a stock height spring.
Thanks for the link, Viken. I'm wondering if there are differences between the US M030 kit and the ROW M030 kit other than the springs (different rates and ride heights, obviously).
The ROW M030 kit is $1050 on the link posted, while the US M030 kit including install is only $690. It might be cheaper, if only the springs are different, to buy the springs and pay the labor to install them on a car which already has the US M030 kit, than to buy the whole ROW M030 kit and pay labor to install all of it. Plus you can change back if the ride height is too low.
Just some musings from pothole capital of the north.
Ofer: Correct. $690 if factory installed. This is one of the big advantages of getting factory-installed items -- it's usuallyt much cheaper than buying the same thing from the Porsche parts vendors and then paying labor to install it. Of course, if you like doing the work yourself, and can, sometimes the parts prices are lower than the factory option.
Viken: according to the UK Porsche website (why is the USA Porsche website so slack on providing useful information?), the springs and shocks are totally different. So my idea for saving some money is basically a Bad Idea.
If one is sure they want the ROW M030, it's cheaper to skip the US M030. Having both might be useful for a fall-back position if ride height is a concern, for re-sale purposes, or if you like to swap suspension components and try them out for your various uses yourself (but it'd be tough to to out-smart the Porsche engineers for a coordinated suspension set-up, I'd imagine).
The reason why these ROW M030 kits are not included on the US site is because they are not available through PCNA in the US. Any part that alter the car's suspension and/or drivetrain from the way it was certified in the US, is not sold by the importer.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.