fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Sad day

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
20 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHSad day

Leading reported evidence

Replace about a thousand or so miles ago

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

Just had the ims replaced about a thousand or so miles ago

Sad day
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace about a thousand or so miles ago' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace about a thousand or so miles ago' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 20 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace about a thousand or so miles ago

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

Just had the ims replaced about a thousand or so miles ago

Sad day
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

20 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T205155Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

My 996.1 engine went out. Took it to a local shop and they said something is broken inside. they need to drop the engine and take it apart to see the damage. I towed it back home. 😔 need to start looking for an engine

POST 3Original post

Can you provide more detail on how it failed? What were the symptoms?

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 20639065

sounded like an exhaust leak at first with a rattle noise. Then loss of power and louder rattle more details . Was driving normal in town, pull into a store and it sounded like an exhaust leak and i thought a heat shield came lose. Sounded almost normal when just idling. But give it gas and loud rattles. Tried to limp home, but car would die. It would start but didn't idle

POST 5Original post

Sounds like the classic IMSB symptoms .......pull the oil filter and look for lots of metal debris...

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 20639105

Just had the ims replaced about a thousand or so miles ago

POST 7Original post

Quotes source post: 20639135

Oh Really ????? .. How interesting !!!! ... Yes I would still pull the oil filter and look for lots of metal debris first......( and the new IMSB also raises concerns ) Secondly, I would drop the oil pan...quick and easy and will tell a LOT .... It is a look in the Soul of the M96 ...

POST 8 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 20639159

yeah. They did it's and put on the ultimate AOS

POST 9Original post

Quotes source post: 20638985

What aftermarket front bumper cover is on your car? Some of these have been known to cause engine overheating.

POST 10 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 20639410

no idea. It was on the car when I got it. Car runs hotter than my 986S but no where near the overheating mark on the gauge

POST 11Original post

Here is your chance for a 4.0 rebuild. I am of the opinion that a devil I know is better than a devil I don't know. Rebuild that beast.

POST 12Original post

Did you take it back to the same shop that �did the ims(b)� 1k miles ago? Did they give you a warranty? What bearing did they use? Etc� etc� etc�

POST 13 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 20639686

they are the ones that said they need to take it apart. Right now I have it at my house.

POST 14Original post

Please keep us up to date as they tear into it. What bearing did you go with LN?

POST 15 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 20641617

I went with the retro fit

POST 16Original post

Sorry, but I have to ask. As part of the LN Engineering IMS Bearing installation instructions, you or them have to send back the old bearing, because if there is anything wrong with the old bearing, they won't warranty it. Did you get a look at the bearing they took out to see what condition it was in?

POST 17Original post

I didn't want to give a 'thumbs-up' to your post due to the possibilty of misinterpretation. Rather...Thank You for sharing your experience, painful as it must be. I bought my 996 with no IMS history of any kind, but I have verified bore-scoring. So I'm doing 2000 mile oil changes and avoiding short trips among other measures to make my engine (i hope) last longer. Posts like yours give us another data point as to how to respond when funny noises crop up and what to look for as we motor along. I wish you the best in your next chapter of Porsche ownership. If I were in your shoes, I might be looking longingly at a Audi 2,7 or (apostasy alert) LS swap.

POST 18 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 20642411

I didn�t see any wrong with the old. And yes I sent it in.

POST 20 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 20644479

Texas near Houston

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.