fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Wider front tires on 17s (215 or 225)?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHWider front tires on 17s (215 or 225)?

Leading reported evidence

Test 996.2, "they've thrown the baby out

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

As EVO wrote when they first tested the 996.2, "they've thrown the baby out with the bathwater".

Wider front tires on 17s (215 or 225)?
Frequently discussed work

Adjust driving style

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I would suggest adjusting your driving style to the car's design.

Wider front tires on 17s (215 or 225)?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Test 996.2, "they've thrown the baby out' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Adjust driving style' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 9 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Adjust driving style

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I would suggest adjusting your driving style to the car's design.

Wider front tires on 17s (215 or 225)?
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Adjust driving style

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I would suggest adjusting your driving style to the car's design.

Wider front tires on 17s (215 or 225)?

Test 996.2, "they've thrown the baby out

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

As EVO wrote when they first tested the 996.2, "they've thrown the baby out with the bathwater".

Wider front tires on 17s (215 or 225)?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T105141Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Time for summer tires. I�m tempted to go wider than the stock 205 at the fronts, hoping it will reduce understeer and make the car (a 996.2) more nimble/throttle steerable � and also because there are no good tires available in the stock sizes. Has anyone else tried 215/45s or 225/45s? And if so, how did it work out?

POST 2Original post

Mine have 225/45's on them... seems fine to me. :shrug:

POST 3Original post

Under steer where and when? With what tires? What tire pressures? Perhaps you are driving the entrance to the turn too fast. In a very tight turn try some trail braking to rotate the car. When you say there are no good tires in the stock 17s...good in what way? I'm very happy with my Contis. If you stick with only N3 tires the selection might get smaller but I'll bet there are a lot of tires that would be standard size and sticky enough for track or street. Bigger tires often require more horsepower to overcome the additional grip and drag...the opposite of tossable.

POST 4Original post

I have 17" wheels. Just ordered 225/45 and 255/40 ZII Star Spec. I also have a bigger bar on the rear that is adjustable and PSS10s. I am hoping to have a good balance that I would enjoy with this setup.

POST 5 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 12176904

All good questions. I�m concerned about turn-in (especially in the wet), understeer, and throttle adjustability. This is partly based on experience, mainly on understansing that the 996.1 is worse in these areas than similar cars (996.1 (all three areas), 996 C4S (first two?), and 997.1 (just the first?)) and that they are more fun as a result. I�d like my car to handle more like them, especially the first two. As for my experience, I haven�t had the car that long, it came with bad summer tires, I�ve mainly driven on (very good Pirelli Sottozero III) winter tires with narrower rears than stock (245) and this a lower rear-to-front width ratios. I�m still looking forward to my first day on track with the car, which will reveal a lot more of the handing. From this limited experience, I definitely don�t want the poor wet turn-in I had with the old summer tires. And I�d like more neutrality in the sort of long, sweeping bends that I like to drive aggressively. These are too fast and too long for trail braking to be a solution for me (on tree-lined country roads). Likewise trying to drift it. I guess therefore that understeer on dry roads has bothered my most mid-corner. Corner exit on the other hand is pretty good. I'd also like the front end to feel more tied down and precise. Not to give more feedback - that's fine - but to enable me to more easily point it precisely where I want it. And I�d like the car to be less sensitive to cross winds. That's my experience. In addition, when reading threads about track wheel and tire sizes, I noticed many people prefer to widen the front more than the rear saying it helps with understeer and is more fun. Plus one or two who went narrower in the rear for more fun on the street (with 18s). So while I know there any many other things that can tilt the handling the way I want it, like tire pressure, toe, camber, roll bar stiffness, etc., I�d still like to choose the optimal tire sizes.

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 12176904

P.S. Based on reviews, my short list includes Conti SC5s, Michelin Pilot Sport 3s, and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2s. (Based on experience, it does not include P Zeros, as they dissapointed on local roads on another car.) I could not find these in 205s with a Y speed rating. Which Contis do you have? True about bigger tires, but 225s didn't seem to be a problem for the 996.1 (I'm assuming the journalists all drove it on 18s).

POST 7 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 12176900

Thanks! Are you using them with the standard 255s in the back? When you went up from 205s, how did it affect the handling balance? And with such wide tires on our narrow 7" front wheels, did you notice any loss of precision or feedback? Thanks again!

POST 8Original post

As I am sure you know, the 911 has very unique weight dynamics. This creates a whole bunch of drivingt techniques that are related to the rear weight mass and how to handle it. Porsche has made the tires at the rear wider and wider compared to the front. They have been building these cars for several decades now and they have not been making the front tire wider in relation to the rears. Trying to get the car to handle like a front engine/rear drive car is wasting time and money. I would suggest adjusting your driving style to the car's design. Mario Andretti once said that most people take the slow turns too fast and the fast turns too slow. Perhaps entering the turn slower will allow you to accelerate out of it faster. Before you start changing the dynamics of the car, perfect your driving technique as the car is designed. A wet skid pad will really get you in harmony with the balance of your car and get you very comfortable with throttle steering at the limit. For alternate tires look at Bridgestone and Yokohamas.

POST 9 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 12179785

All true, but more true for some Porsches than others. Both the car that came before and the car that came after had proportionally less extra width at the rear. It seems Porsche has been trying to tame the rear for decades, and in so doing, with the 996.2, they may have gone too far. As EVO wrote when they first tested the 996.2, "they've thrown the baby out with the bathwater". No matter how hard he tried or how aggressively he drove it, David Vivian could not find the nimbleness of its predecessor. Then with the 997, if nothing else, Porsche at least found a way to improve the turn in. I've been using both techniques mentioned (trail braking and slower in, faster out) since I bought the car. Am I hopelessly bad at them? Probably not. My trail braking could be a lot better, but I've been working on it for years, including with instructors, so even if perfecting it would solve all my problems, if it isn't perfect yet, it won't be perfect 6 months from now either. And anyway, trail braking enough to free the rear is not something I going to do at 90 mph on a tree-lined country road. Do I want a car that handles like a front-engine, rear-drive car? No. Do I want a car that, in some ways, handles more like some other 911s (like the 996.1 and the 997.1)? Yes I do.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.