fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Current part number for RMS?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHCurrent part number for RMS?

Leading reported evidence

Replace they did

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I wonder what exactly are the changes they did...

Original post Read captured discussion
Current part number for RMS?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace they did' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace they did' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 10 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace they did

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I wonder what exactly are the changes they did...

Original post Read captured discussion
Current part number for RMS?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T122219Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I have another leaker. The last replacement used part number 997.101.212.00 . Is there a newer seal design available? Thanks.

POST 2 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Never mind, found it 997.101.212.01

POST 3Original post

Are you paying someone to R&R or is the dealer helping you?

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 6464649

Warranty (thank God)

POST 5Original post

Is there a way to get the date issued for thoese parts?

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 6468922

Not that I know of, but I can tell you this. In Oct '07 I had 997.101.212.0 0 put in and this week I had 997.101.212.0 1 put in. Andy

POST 7Original post

Thanks for the info. My RMS was done in My 2006, and it is still dry. I wonder what exactly are the changes they did...

POST 8Original post

I know it should be easy to find this answer but I was not having as much luck as I usually do. Is 997.101.212.01 still the latest and greatest? Since you bothered to read this, here is a free picture of the tool I just got to put the seal on It still has preservative on it, so don't stress about the fuzzy lettering...

POST 9Original post

Oh how I would love to borrow that in about a month... Chris

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.