14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHRennline 4" shift riser
Leading reported evidence
Install numeric racing shifter
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
that said - I have also installed the Numeric Racing shifter.
Leading evidence: 'Install numeric racing shifter' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install numeric racing shifter' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
CAE: Precise, hard, notchy, and intollerant - I would say it came across as a bit harsher than the Numeric set on its shortest throw.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If that is the case, the mid setting sounds appealing if it was that good...
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T142254Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I've removed the center console of my car and relocated the window switches up to the dash now... that said - I have also installed the Numeric Racing shifter. I want to put it up on the Rennline 4" riser now. My understanding was that I would need to raise the e-brake handle - so I did that with the Function First 2" risers.
My question before just jumping into this is with the cables - the 4" riser angles back - which should eliminate some of the tension of the cables...
Anyone done this before and was there enough adjustability in the cables to do this?
Well, I answered my own question. It looks like the emergency brake handle is going to interfere a little bit, however there's and backward adjustment opportunity in the riser mount it self. I don't think it's going to be much of an issue, but it certainly does not appear That there will be any issue with the cable.
Easiest answer is to remove the ebrake and rear shoes. Less unsprung weight and makes it a real race car. Although there are definitely times I've gone "now why did I do that again?"
There was enough adjustability in the riser to clear the handle. Regardless - I imagine that the e-brake will go away when this thing becomes a spec car.... I love the new height.
I didn't know about the CAE before buying the Numeric. My friend has the CAE shifter installed in his track car... he likes it but I think I recall him saying that he thought the Numeric might be a better choice.
I like the look and height of the CAE as well - but I also already had the NR.... the height of the CAE is why I added the Rennline 4"
The Numeric pretty epic? Did you go straight from stock to that or have any other shifter (997/GT3) before going Numeric? Time over asked question of if it is worth double price... Sure looks amazing
What feel does it have? I don't track but enjoy an aggressive driving feel on the street... I also have no experience with the GT3 shifter and was initially going to just do that one.
Precise and notchy. GT3 is a nice shifter as well. If price conscious, there's a Boxster guy that makes shifters that are supposed to be really good and cheap as well.
I have used the stock 997, the B&M short, the Numeric short, and the OEM SSK as well as messing around with the CAE.
Stock 997: It's actually okay for what it is.
B&M: Surprisingly sloppy in my 996 for my tastes. When I upgraded the motor and trans mount it made a HUGE difference - but the shifter was still sloppy.
Numeric: I have had it in my 997 for probably 15K miles (mostly track). I used mid-throw settings on it. It was PERFECT and worth every penny on the street as well as the track. It's precise - but not too harsh. I now have it in my dedicated track car - the 996 at the shortest throw possible - its very precise and bolt-action feeling. I will try it at Sebring in a couple of weeks.
The OEM SSK: Very similar to the B&M - shorter throws but nothing like the Numeric.
CAE: Precise, hard, notchy, and intollerant - I would say it came across as a bit harsher than the Numeric set on its shortest throw.
This is awesome! I did not realize the Numeric is adjustable, that is pretty great. If that is the case, the mid setting sounds appealing if it was that good... Thank you so much for the information, super helpful. I don't mind paying especially when it is worth it!
Blue chip has tried my CAE shifter, he is absolutely correct about the feedback. If I would be racing I would go for a Numeric. Faster shifts.
CAE is beautiful and cool with an amazingly short throw. Hard to adjust.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.