37 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHSexy Girl in a Bra
Leading reported evidence
Replace grand am - just frequent thorough washings
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Although I never did use one when a 1968 Polar White 911 replaced the Grand Am - just frequent thorough washings.
Leading evidence: 'Replace grand am - just frequent thorough washings' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace grand am - just frequent thorough washings' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Good move - I get the protection aspect and if I were to take a drive where I know conditions warrant the use, I'd use it but as for looks - paint chips are a way of life.......embrace life!
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Good move - I get the protection aspect and if I were to take a drive where I know conditions warrant the use, I'd use it but as for looks - paint chips are a way of life.......embrace life!
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
37 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T052503Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I wouldn't have exactly put it that way but I agree. Personally no condoms of any kind for me por favor.
I've seen the uneven paint from both traditional bra's and clear bra's in the long term outcome.
Looks like it could be a good option for the track. Any recommendations on a removable (preferably one handed
) bra that could hold up to the demands of the track?
[Image-only post; no author-written text. Original image references:]
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/360x270/1357325593_porschebra_0215cf78f1695db6fe93d5500dff18fdc3315661.jpg
Excuse me. I somewhat resemble that remark as I remember running one on my white 1973 Grand Am in Florida during love bug season. We didn't leave them on though, just used them for interstate road trips and removed them immediately after.
Although I never did use one when a 1968 Polar White 911 replaced the Grand Am - just frequent thorough washings.
People thought I was crazy to dump a 2 year old low mileage luxury cruiser for a high mileage "pregnant roller skate" with A/C that was a joke and an interior environment that mostly resembled a 007 smoke screen. But I'd still take that car in a heart beat.
Good move - I get the protection aspect and if I were to take a drive where I know conditions warrant the use, I'd use it but as for looks - paint chips are a way of life.......embrace life!
