41 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 turbo kit or supercharger kit
Leading reported evidence
Run vf engineering's supercharger kit
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I ran VF Engineering's supercharger kit for 5 years (2013-2018) and approx.
Leading evidence: 'Run vf engineering's supercharger kit' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'little high even though they're' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Run car at 4' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
I made 385 at the wheels on a dynojet dyno with a 3.8, so I think VFs' numbers are probably a little high even though they're using engine dyno numbers.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
We recommend running the car at 4 to 6 psi with the boost controller.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
reasons Porsche developed and entirely different engine to run with a turbo………..all of which you are likely to discover if you go this route
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Uses dry-style filters that do Not require oiling; simply wash down with warm water and re-use
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I made 385 at the wheels on a dynojet dyno with a 3.8, so I think VFs' numbers are probably a little high even though they're using engine dyno numbers.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
little high even though they're
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
I made 385 at the wheels on a dynojet dyno with a 3.8, so I think VFs' numbers are probably a little high even though they're using engine dyno numbers.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
41 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T044418Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
With 315 hp being non competitive on the street at this point I've been taking a serious look into this:
http://www.tpcracing.com/products/TP...CT-Conversion/
a) has anyone had experiences with after-market turbo on a 996 and if so, good/bad?
b) what's the difference between a supercharger kit and a turbo kit?
c) would either kit in b) above be too stressful for my engine causing it to prematurely fail or can the engine handle the extra boost?
520 hp ...
Sorry but non competitive on the street? You dont need to be competitive on the street...
Apologies for the flame, but not knowing the answer to question b suggests 315HP is more than enough for you for now.
A modified car is never as reliable as stock. There is always a trade off, The boost levels are relatively low so lag shouldn't be too bad but there is always some lag. Looks like full boost dosen't hit until about 4,000 rpm.
Finding someone that can do repairs on a modified car is iffy sometimes also.
At $10,000 for the kit I would sell current car put that $10,000 plus the cost of install on top of it and buy a car that was a turbo from the factory.
This had been discussed many, MANY,
MANY
times already. Do a search. If you don't want to read all the crap. The short answer is sell your car, buy a 996 Turbo. Want more, and all the reasons, do a search.
Do you honestly think that some guys in a garage know better than 10 years of research from a team of PhD's with a budget consisting of millions of dollars from Porsche? If so, go buy their turbo/supercharger...
The ONLY thing I would mess with, is perhaps mufflers...just for the sound and no other reason.
+1. Not sure what you mean by street competition... Started on the wrong foot.
If you want to have fun, may I suggest participating in DE events (PCA, BMW, etc.).
With a few minor modifications, you will see that your car can actually be very competitive and keep up with much higher HP cars. Straight line power is not the only factor. Cornering and handling is more important. In any case, the biggest mod is behind the wheel... Once you are sure you have reached its limit, you may choose revisit the Supercharging vs. Turbo issues (which is still an interesting topic).
FM
A) Unfortunently you won't find much of that going on here. I'am still new to the Porsche forums but there's no where near as many people doing serious hp mods as people would do in the for example bmw forums
B) If your asking this question forget about any aftermarket turbo Porsche. You'll reget it big time. Get yourself a little car like a Jetta vr6 and turbo that. Build a kit yourself and familiarize yourself with turbo cars. You'll gain more then 300whp and youll kill your bank account far less. Right now your not ready.. Sorry. Then again if you really got that cash then go for it.. Make sure you put up a build thread to motivate others.
C) Making more power in anything, any way, any how will cause more stress. It's just the way it is. Boosting a car that came na from 300 to 500hp is a lot and you WILL break things because you WILL want to push it and DON'T kid yourself and say your going to baby it everywhere
I agree with the others for big power buy a turbo to start. I did mods and enjoy the car more, its quicker and handles way better and is 10x more fun to drive. If you want to win on the streets you should get a new Mustang, S/C it and have a 10 sec car. Porsches are not about winning on the street, the track though is where they shine, brightly.
The turbo kit is not too much for your engine to handle. We recommend running the car at 4 to 6 psi with the boost controller. We have several cars with this system and they all run great and very strong.
Just to clarify on the difference between turbo charger and super charger:
I wasn't asking from a technical perspective but moreso from a "in what situations/driving conditions/scenarios is a super charger the better tool and when is a turbo the better tool?" perspective.
The track is great but 95% of the time, the challenges occur either at a stoplight or on the highway, not the track and the "course" isn't going to have many turns but a straight shot for the most part
There are as many answers to this question as their are turbo/supercharger options.
Generally speaking, a supercharger is going to give you "instant" power, more low end torque and a smoother power curve whereas a turbo will offer more horsepower higher in the power band and will have a more aggressive curve.
With that said, you can make a turbo or supercharger behave in either manner based on the size of the turbine/compressor/pulley/etc. you choose.
I've had both (and nitrous too) on many, many cars that I've owned and raced (drag and road course). For the street (and occasional track), I always preferred the instant power of a positive displacement supercharger. The Turbo is more efficient and will always give you more HP and higher trap/top end speed but, it really depends on your goal.
Mike
+1
These two quotes kinda sum it up to me. I spent quite a bit of $ on my motor modding it up short of boosting it and it never made me feel it was worth it for the return feeling in the seat for power. As far as making it more exciting to drive with the money I spent.. oh ya. My Porsche came alive for putting a smile on my face, every corner put a grin on my face. the get up and go isn't horrible but compared to all the American cars I've had over the years supercharged, turboed, nitrous etc. ... ya its going to leave you wanting more.
It comes done to what you want. Its your car, make it what you want. that's what I'm doing with mine.. and I'm really changing mine up, more then any other I've seen on this forum lol
mod on brother
[Image-only post; no author-written text. Original image references:]
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/570x347/1d869a7c_4232_42ce_8175_0909876d1361_56ce4344bfa5acce1ed95417336fe733eefa59a2.gif
So.. for $10K, sell your 996 and buy a 996 turbo. But.. what if you find a NIB turbo kit for $5K. Is the smart money still on buying the factory-turboed 911? I kinda like the idea of a "sleeper" 911.. and with RWD, not AWD.
A 5K kit is NOT going to make more power ,, just wont.
Sleeper 911? Now there's two words I would not have put together..
The reason they put AWD on the turbos was to keep them from looping
I prefer the launch that sticks to smoking the tires off.. Especially since tires that
can handle the side load our cars produce can approach 2K a set.. YMMV
Here's a link to the kit, which is $10K and claims 420ish horsepower to the wheels, which is obviously a huge jump over the 275ish that the NA 996s put down.
https://www.tpcracing.com/product/tp...-4s-turbo-kit/
Sure, spending $10K plus several grand for install on a 996 probably isn't a sound financial decision, but what if one were to come across a kit that someone had bought but never used, and it was available for half of that $10K?
I like the idea of 420rwhp in a RWD platform--AWD is all well and good for some people, but I prefer managing wheelspin with my right foot, not letting the front tires do the work. AWD "keeps Turbos from looping"??! LOL, good one!
There are family sedans that are quicker than 996s nowadays. So yeah, a Carrera that makes more power than a Turbo would definitely be a sleeper.
If you start with a confirmed-healthy M96, I feel like it would have at least somewhat of a chance of making 400+hp without grenading itself. And.. if it does go boom, then have the rebuild done to be able to handle the boost.
Wow! Maybe it's because of my age, but I really don't care about beating family sedans. Sure, there are quicker cars now that can beat a 20 year old sports car. I read on Petrolicious about one new car that can do 0-60 in 1.9 seconds. That is amazing...but who really cares? That is beyond human skill to drive. And so, there will always be people poorer than me and richer than me. I don't care. I am totally comfortable with my life and my 996.
And spending $10K to add 120 HP? Engine was not designed for that and will not last long. I'm out for longevity so I can continue to enjoy my 996 as long as possible. Here's my 2 cents...
Just seems like $10k is a lot of money to spend on a risk. Motor swap is more appealing to me. with my motor swap if the motor blows I can pick up another motor from a junk yard for $300, rebuild it for $2k and i'm done. if you boost the 3.4.. rebuild is insane cost and if you add making it stronger to handle the boost that just blew your motor.. makes my exhaust clench just thinking bout it lol. Just seems like a money pit to boost that motor...swap it if you want the hp
Portland international,, come out of turn 12 in a turbo and punch it,, you'll hit the left hand rail,, then the right hand guard rail after the right hand turn backwards.. The AWD cars don't do that..
High HP, Rear wheel drive and a slight camber change.. Excitement exceeds acceptable limits. Sometimes guys get lucky and they manage to keep it spinning and it slides outward..
You do realize the rebuild cost on these is basically 15 to 20K??? It can be done cheaper.. if your good and can DIY and do the research..
What family sedans do 170+ Stock ?? and sub 5 seconds 0-60,, That cost less than about $80K I'm trying to think of one.. I'm not really in the modern car loop these days..
Note I'm just chatting here,, its all a philosophical debate.. If ya like the idea go for it and please post up the videos, it oughta be impressive..
Chrysler 300SRT is one that comes to mind...Had an 06 and I really miss that car!
But as other have said the m96 is not the platform that can handle forced induction in stock form. LNE can tell you all about it.
You know what else doesn't do that? Cars driven by people whose brains understand how traction and the throttle need to be modulated. LOL
The turbo kit listed above claims it only puts 4.5 psi into the motor. That seems pretty mild. So far I haven't come across any threads about anyone doing forced induction on an M96, much less blowing up one of them.
In the ~$50K range, here are a few: Kia Stinger GT. Audi S4. Audi RS3. Charger SRT8. Not that a family sedan is the benchmark against which the 911 should be compared, just saying that the bar is continuously being raised as far as straight-line performance goes.
Anyway, this isn't something serious at this point. I just came across someone selling a never-installed turbo kit for a good bit less than retail, and figured it might be fun to do. (Haven't gotten a reply from the supposed seller, though.) Although, first thing's first.. I need to get anything else that's amiss sorted out before considering jumping into the deep end of the pool.
I would stop and think long and hard before taking an engine with the M96’s reputation and taking it from a normally aspirated configuration and adding an aftermarket blower or turbo……………. There are
many
reasons Porsche developed and entirely different engine to run with a turbo………..all of which you are likely to discover if you go this route
I ran VF Engineering's supercharger kit for 5 years (2013-2018) and approx. 3000 miles.
DIY Install
Boost was capped at 5.5 psi. No problems until my AOS failed and car ran lean. After that I heard a knock and decided to do a DIY elective rebuild from 3.4 to 3.8L. I was expecting to see bore scoring, but after tearing everything down, the only culprit I could attribute it to was worn rod bearings. I'm not an expert, and I haven't posted photos online of the disassembly yet, but maybe there was more to it. For anyone that wants to add a SC to their setup, DM me, as mine is up for sale. (I need to pay for those LN Nickies, Carillo Rods, JE Pistons, IMS Solution, Hoffman Heads!)
Hey!! Scott here from Fabspeed, I've dealt with many of these packages in the past. It really boils down to how far you want to go and at what sacrifice. I have heard a lot of horror stories on converting an NA vehicle to forced induction. In my opinion (biased of course) add some bolt on upgrades like exhaust, intake, and tuning. While yes, you will not add 100+ WHP but you will save substantial $$ and have a new found love for your car. We have some killer options for your car, from air intake systems, to completely bolt on exhaust upgrades. Take a look at a few of the options and feel free to PM me for forum pricing!
Porsche 996 Carrera Carbon Fiber Competition Air Intake System (2000-2004)
Fits all Porsche 996 Carrera vehicles from 2000-2004 (Specify Transmission and Trim Level above).
The Tiptronic Transmission and X51 Models include an additional breather filter and hose for the factory PCV connection.
Improves horsepower and torque by 24 whp and 19 ft-lbs
Uses dry-style filters that do Not require oiling; simply wash down with warm water and re-use
Intake constructed from genuine carbon fiber
CAD designed for maximum air flow
Direct bolt-on replacement for the factory air box
Porsche 996 Carrera Sport Catalytic Converter X-Pipe (1999-2004)
Fits all Porsche 996 Carrera vehicles 1998-2004
Greatly improve horsepower and torque by 25 whp and 32 ft-lbs
Saves 11 lbs from the rear of the vehicle
Proprietary Investment Cast X with tuned window was dyno developed to deliver huge mid range torque and high rpm horsepower gains
X-pipe design includes integrated 200-cell HJS Sport Catalytic Converters for maximum flow, efficiency, all while being able to pass tail pipe emissions tests (will not pass C.A.R.B visual inspection)
Constructed from T304L stainless steel tubing, mandrel-bent for accuracy and flow
All Fabspeed performance products are backed by the Fabspeed Lifetime Warranty
Porsche 996 Carrera Sport Headers (1999-2004)
Fits all Porsche 996 Carrera vehicles worldwide 1998-2004
Improves horsepower and torque by 15 whp and 12 ft-lbs
Saves 2 lbs from the rear of the vehicle
One piece CNC mandrel-bent primary tubes provide maximum scavenging and flow
F1-style merge collectors CAD designed with merge spike or maximum power versus LOG shaped OEM factory headers.
Improves power and torque throughout the RPM range
Direct replacement for the factory headers
100% complies with emissions. Bolts up to stock OEM catalytic converters.
Simple DIY bolt-on installation- Easy on so simple.
Fabspeed Motorsport USA 25+ years of design Engineering Excellence.
All Fabspeed performance products are backed by the Fabspeed Lifetime Warranty
Porsche 996 Carrera ExperTune Performance Software (1999-2004)
996 Carrera S 3.6L
Stock = 320 WHP / 273 TQ
Tuned = 333 WHP / 286 TQ
996 Carrera 3.4L
Stock 296 WHP / 258 TQ
Tuned 309 WHP / 272 TQ
Fits all Porsche 996 Carrera 3.4L / Carrera S 3.6L vehicles (2000-2004)
NOT AVAILABLE FOR CABLE DRIVEN THROTTLE BODY EQUIPPED VEHICLES (1998-1999)
TPC did the install on my 2000 millenium edition 996 almost 12 years ago and 20.000 km with no problem. I don't track my car so i don't know full potential on race track
but its blast to drive on street . I think it's worth every penny i spend on turbo.
Was this in reference to my post? If so, nope. That is referred to as "stacking" horsepower. I would have to agree with you, these bolt on's would add around 30-33 whp!
You Tube
Apparently forced induction on NA 996s is less uncommon than I thought. There's a FB group about it:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/supe...ef=group_cover
The supercharger kit is $9K and should be good for low 400s at the wheels on a 3.6.
https://vfengineering.com/products/s...11-carrera-996
I am thinking very strongly about doing that kit once I've got the car paid off.
This is a REALLY old topic, but I have a 997.1 with the VF supercharger, and it rips. It's currently undergoing some drivability issues, but unrelated to the supercharger. Also you know you still pull at lights if the time is right, 8 years later or not.
I made 385 at the wheels on a dynojet dyno with a 3.8, so I think VFs' numbers are probably a little high even though they're using engine dyno numbers. Mine might benefit from some tweaking of the tune, but I don't think there's 50 more horse in there, at least not at 6lb. Additionally I have the full Fabspeed exhaust with 200 cell cats and headers. No other power adders or mods to the engine.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.