11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHPhantom check engine light
Leading reported evidence
Replace bank 2
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Ended up replacing both bank 2 that had heater issues.
Leading evidence: 'Replace bank 2' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check codes' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Keep a scan tool with you and check for codes when the CEL illuminates.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
It's an 03, and the problem is i immediately check with a foxwell.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
To confirm , you will need to trace the wiring to the correct Sensor/location....OR disconnect a Sensor and wait for the code to pop up to see if the correct code poped for the Sensor that you unplugged...
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I had the crossover pipes off to replace a water pump and then also pulled the trans due to an issue with a used flywheel.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
To confirm , you will need to trace the wiring to the correct Sensor/location....OR disconnect a Sensor and wait for the code to pop up to see if the correct code poped for the Sensor that you unplugged...
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I have seen people install cross-over pipes and accidentally switch the wiring for the 02 sensors...( the wiring is long enough on some cars to reach the wrong position)....This does NOT cause an 02 Sensor code ( or any code) but the car will absolutely run like trash after a few minutes...
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Recently I've started getting a check engine light, but using durametric or foxwell to look there are no codes other the tip can vus timeout after the swap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T201111Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Recently I've started getting a check engine light, but using durametric or foxwell to look there are no codes other the tip can vus timeout after the swap.
I have changed to 200 cel cats and am wondering g if that could be the issue. I'm thinking about changing to a row tune, but until then does anyone have any ideas how to capture these codes? Its kind of embarrassing to jump in with an instructor at hpde only.to ha e the car look like it's not reliable.
Sounds pretty straight forward to me.....you did a Tip to 6 speed swap but have not reprogrammed the DME for 6 speed....The DME is looking for info from the TIP ECU and when it finally gives up, it pops the CEL ...
You will need to get a PIWIS and get your IPAS codes and re-program for 6 speed.......or take it to you Local Friendly Porsche Center ...
It will depend on the year model......the earlier cars have a much smaller CAN Network than the later cars....
When the CEL pops up, there will be a code...What is this code ?? If the code is for CAN Network then that is your issue...
It's an 03, and the problem is i immediately check with a foxwell. Ive been driving the car for 6 months since the trans swap and this didn't happen before. I had the crossover pipes off to replace a water pump and then also pulled the trans due to an issue with a used flywheel. Now all of a sudden I'm getting g this weird behavior. I'll get my piwis out and see if I can dig deeper.
And, BTW, i do already have my iPas codes. Just been waiting g u t I didn't have any planned events to try and shoot a manual program I to the ecu.
I have seen people install cross-over pipes and accidentally switch the wiring for the 02 sensors...( the wiring is long enough on some cars to reach the wrong position)....This does NOT cause an 02 Sensor code ( or any code) but the car will absolutely run like trash after a few minutes...
To confirm , you will need to trace the wiring to the correct Sensor/location....OR disconnect a Sensor and wait for the code to pop up to see if the correct code poped for the Sensor that you unplugged...
Already did that. Ended up replacing both bank 2 that had heater issues. Probably going to just buy 2 new bosch sensors and see if that clears the problem.
