11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH5.0 mustang run-in in mexico
Leading reported evidence
Run 13.0 around 111, all stock
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
and a newer IRS s550 was running 13.0 around 111, all stock on similar summer tires.
Leading evidence: 'Run 13.0 around 111, all stock' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run 13.0 around 111, all stock' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
On the 2nd run I figured he would be on his game, we went to 4th gear again and he couldn't pull on me.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Performance figures from our test car’s initial visit to the track (after its break-in period) were strong and slightly quicker than our long-term 2013 Mustang GT’s, with a zero-to-60-mph time of 4.3 seconds and a quarter-mile pass of 12.9 at 112 mph.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Performance figures from our test car’s initial visit to the track (after its break-in period) were strong and slightly quicker than our long-term 2013 Mustang GT’s, with a zero-to-60-mph time of 4.3 seconds and a quarter-mile pass of 12.9 at 112 mph.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T091943Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
2013-14 5.0 GT badged mustang didn't want to let me pass him. I knew he had me covered , but I hit it anyway, ran up to the bottom of 4th and pulled on him the whole time. We went again with him right behind me at a stop light. On the 2nd run I figured he would be on his game, we went to 4th gear again and he couldn't pull on me. I have no doubt a 420 hp GT mustang can take my old 3.4 911. But on this day it didn't happen. Those drives into Mexico are fun..
I agree completely. I am in no way trying to say I have a ringer or something. I fully expected the guy to March right past me the 2nd time. Maybe he missed a gear both times or something, I don't know. I was for sure " given her all she's got captain". I expect a new 5.0 to be somewhere between my 911 and my 440rwhp Z06.
Well one time on a track this summer. *Cough*. I came up behind a shelby mustang. It was newer, guessing 2015. I was behind him for a little bit, and gave him a quick look inside. We came to a pretty straight part and we're doing 27ish. I was in first waiting. As soon as he goes I nail it almost immediately hit second and to my surprise I am on him tight I hear him shift,i hit third WOT. I'm still right thereup too~90 and he's started to walk away, we'll run. But for 7-9 second I was everything he could handle.
Editor's note,i think he didn't see my little cab as a threat and didn't use full rpm/gear to start with. And even though I went on him, again I don't think he was fully committed. So I had the jump. Was lots of fun on that back country road * cough* I mean track.
those 5.0's are not as fast as people think. My friend has one and it IS slower than my 3.6L... and I truly believe it all comes down to the weight vs. power ratio
Performance figures from our test car’s initial visit to the track (after its break-in period) were strong and slightly quicker than our long-term 2013 Mustang GT’s, with a zero-to-60-mph time of 4.3 seconds and a quarter-mile pass of 12.9 at 112 mph.
Thats damn near a second faster than the n/a 996. If you are claiming that your n/a is as fast then your friend needs to learn how to drive.
source.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...w-intro-page-4
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porsche_996
Mirrors my experience. Last time I raced some new 5.0s I was running 13.3@106 and stock s197s (older live rear axle) were doing 11.7-11.9s@ I can't remember? and a newer IRS s550 was running 13.0 around 111, all stock on similar summer tires.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
