15 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHHave you ever had this happen to you?
Leading reported evidence
Use ****ty camera
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
They must have used a ****ty camera for spotting my AMG.
Leading evidence: 'Use ****ty camera' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use ****ty camera' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T194705Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
My 9 year old daughter brought her ipad to me just now to show me that she saw my car on the internet. Sure enough, it was a pic of me driving my car. I followed the pic's link and found this:
https://www.autogespot.com/porsche-996-turbo/2016/10/31
Gotta admit, it was a little creepy. A few months ago, I saw a pic of my car parked outside the museum that someone posted on a carspotting site (a friend told me about it). That wasn't a big deal - it was parked in front of a car museum, after all. But this one is actually me driving down the street. I guess the lesson learned is that as much as we probably take these cars for granted after owning one for awhile, they do draw a ton of attention.
The funny thing is that there are a lot of very nice, waaay more expensive cars in this part of town. Hey, what a great compliment - I'll take it. Especially given that a new loaded Accord or Camry rolling off the dealer's lot probably cost more than what I paid for my car.
Good point. Now THAT would be unsettling.
I have no idea what you are talking about.
Well, normally yes, but now I think it's worth something.
Well then the joke's on them! Car ring boss to thief who shows up in my car: "You stole one with the goofy headlights? Dumbass!"
Really, that is a little creepy. They could have at least fuzzed out the license plate. I disagree with the comments. I think the wheels look great and so do the tail lights if you like the newer look.
