21 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 Rennlisters on Facebook?
Leading reported evidence
Run across this group
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Run across this group' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run across this group' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
21 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T144035Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I ran across this group on Facebook. I didn't really recognize any cars or people from here, but the usernames on Facebook are real names. So, who knows? I did see a Jake Raby post (about guns, go figure - once a Marine . . .).
Anyhow, who here is also on there?
And why? Seems like it would be easier to just post on Rennlist.
Good to know. I don't see a way to search who is a member of that group. Would be nice to put a face to a name (well, on second thought . . .)
But Dennis, how will I know vital info like when you are waiting in line at Starbucks to buy a Venti Triple Latte Mochachino Frappe'?
I am and the 911 Porsche turbo turbo page which is actually quite good, and Texas Porsche enthusiast.
Also there is a great Porsche parts and car group.
Tyler Grappe.
Makes sense to join the groups that don't have their own forums. I'm just trying to make sense of the Rennlist one and wondering if maybe I am missing a raison d'etre.
Ah, man, I just read through all the post and comments on wheel spacers. I didn't recognize your car in the pic. I need to do the same to my wheels.
I tried to "friend" you, but couldn't find the button and noticed that you aren't showing any friends. Did you block the "friending" function or is my browser just messed up?
It is awesome. What a great platform. Just got home from the track as a matter of fact. My brakes are shot, tires are cooked and my windshield is cracked. I think I pushed her to the limit. I do miss the rawness and power of the 996 but I think I am mid engine hooked now.
We only lost one motor on track this weekend and it was a GT3. All the 996's faired very well and passed me often.
Yes, because Google doesn't already have live copies of everything you've ever written, read, researched, or thought.
The Zuck just wanted to be rich. Google's the one you should worry about...whenever a company feels the need to make its corporate motto "don't be evil," you can pretty much guarantee it's going to turn out to be evil.
In Oct. 2015, Google dropped "don't be evil" from its code of conduct, believing that such language is "outdated."
The comedy, of course, is that the US government now collects far more data than it can analyze. The goal of the Patriot Act and subsequent legislation (and those things implemented without worrying about such petty things as legality) was to prevent crime, but instead what they have managed to put together is a great way to research who was responsible ex post facto. Very reassuring.
I'm on a couple of 996 pages on Facebook. Just love seeing all the IMS B.S. hashed over again and again. Incredible how much misinformation there is out there.
Yeah, I've read about Google as well. It is frightening to me.
On "Zuck" I just don't trust anyone who used to have a management slogan of "Move fast and break things". BTW he made it to his goal!
