fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

2002 c4s front end sits higher than rear

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
20 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH2002 c4s front end sits higher than rear

Leading reported evidence

Set car

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I suggest you set your car on a level surface and measure the distances from the ground to the fender lips for the four wheels.

2002 c4s front end sits higher than rear
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Set car' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Set car' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 20 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Set car

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I suggest you set your car on a level surface and measure the distances from the ground to the fender lips for the four wheels.

2002 c4s front end sits higher than rear
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

20 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T191851Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Is this common? Mine looks like it has a reverse rake. 69k miles 20160606_141025.jpg

POST 3Original post

Here is a pic of my 2002 C4S, it sits pretty even I think.

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Looks great, that's stock suspension?

POST 6Original post

Take a couple seconds and think for a minute why the rear would sit lower than the front on a 12+ year old 911.

POST 8Original post

Looks like a very unflattering camera angle. Exacerbates the wheel to fender gap. Chicago Petes angle is pretty much the exact opposite.

POST 9Original post

Was this photo taken at Porsche Atlanta perimeter Jim Ellis

POST 11Original post

I think it's common in the USA to raise the front bumper high enough to meet government front impact crash requirements. I could be wrong on this, but I thought I read it somewhere in the past.

POST 12Original post

Ok since no one else has just come out and said it - it is quite likely that due to the age of your car the suspension is in need of a refresh. Given that most of the weight is in the rear of the car that is where it'll sag the most. Update your suspension and you'll get the car looking right again.

POST 13Original post

I suggest you set your car on a level surface and measure the distances from the ground to the fender lips for the four wheels. Then you have something to compare. From a picture is difficult to assess.

POST 14Original post

Take a straight side shot. I don't think there is any rake. The side molding looks equidistant to the ground front and rear. It's a bad camera angle and these cars have a HUGE gender gap on factory US suspension. Furthermore I'm not convinced having a rear engine would make the rear sag more than the front even if it had 200k on the clock. The front springs are MUCH softer and likely get more abused than the rear. I would think the soft front springs see more abuse from braking than the suitably stiffer rear spring/ shock combo see from a engine sitting there.

POST 15Original post

Cannot determine anything from that angle. Here's what stock looks like.

POST 16Original post

Quotes source post: 13382485

This. Plus the usual combo of age/wear and engine in the rear. Only US cars had the lifted fronts as ROW cars got more of an even stance. Hence the ROW upgrade kits being very popular upgrade here in the states.

POST 17Original post

only reason i can think that your front end sits higher is if fuel tank is near empty? mine is always level

POST 18Original post

Any "stock" even level C4S either has the M030 option on it or hasn't been driven like it should all it's life.

POST 20Original post

That second picture is actually a 991, not a 997. But good comparison.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.