20 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAre solid thrust bushings worth it?
Leading reported evidence
Use elephant racing lcas
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I used Elephant Racing LCAs with solid bushings and spherical bearings.
Leading evidence: 'Use elephant racing lcas' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Repair patches, expansion joints etc' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
This helps to smoothen driving over repair patches, expansion joints etc.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If u dont replace all of them with solid heims the ride will be the same and your wallet will be lighter
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I'm going to be installing new lower control arms so this would be a good time to replace the rubber bushings.
Replace works in porsche suspensions | tech tactics
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
How elasto-kinematic toe change works in Porsche suspensions | Tech Tactics
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The problem is that if you want to go "sports driving" and push limits, you're using stickier tires than the factory intended, so 1) the tires are now faster than the chassis, and 2) the factory bushings will literally tear and/or collapse under a few hours of >1G loads.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
20 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T213932Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Tarret ones are a pain to adjust. I personally use non adjustable ones and get adjustable trailing arms instead like the SPC ones with sealed ball joints.
Its a part u dont need unless u r tracking your car regularly. If u look at a parts diagram u will see its in the middle of several other rubber bushings. If u dont replace all of them with solid heims the ride will be the same and your wallet will be lighter
I used Elephant Racing LCAs with solid bushings and spherical bearings. Wasn't tracking enough to put up with the NVH and went back to stock (Rennline) GT3 LCAs with rubber bushings and mounts.
They were *definitely* sharper with handling, but not really well suited to the roads around where I am.
A clip from an old auto mag on max g force of oem sports cars
Car Type of G-force & Peak G-force
2.004 g
Dodge Challenger Demon 170 Acceleration g
KoenigseggOne:1 Cornering g
1.6 g
Porsche 911 Carrera 4S Cornering g
1.39 g
Jeep TrackHawk Acceleration g
1.3 g
2020 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Cornering g
1.3 g
Same results more or less in the slalom. The 911 handles with the best of them consistently.
Seems the 911 is in good company at 2nd on the cornering pulling g's list, only beat by the hyper exotic cars costing tons more ca$h.
So, my question to all those looking to put race car suspension components on their street car or occasional track car, and not in a competitive race series.
What is the goal here..? If its to add noise, harshness, vibration & quickly worn out tires, then I understand.
Does handling of the oem car really need an improvement/compromise beyond what a total refreshed oem suspension set at somewhat stock alignment specs can achieve with sticky tires..? I say no, unless one is looking for 'show'....
jmho
Solid aluminium (Solid rubber ones to a lesser extent) will take away the 'give' that the original rubber bushing, with its voids provide in longitudinal direction. This helps to smoothen driving over repair patches, expansion joints etc. and takes away the sensation of crashing over them without the suspension absorbing anything.
At the same time the stock bushings are solid in lateral direction, so any cornering force build-up by the tyres is transferred to the chassis/car with minimum delay.
Only if the stiffness of rubber solid bushes in lateral direction is higher than stock, you would feel a quicker response to a steering input. New stock bushes would already be an improvement over old ones in that respect.
HTH
That got me thinking about the thrust bushings. Yes as you point out it now seems clear the diagonal provides fore and aft stability for the lower control arm. And the bushing dampens fore/aft forces. I presume these are less significant than up and down forces that the suspension absorbs.
I'm going to install these as they are and run them for a while to see how they go.
As
@De Jeeper
noted, there's rubber at both ends of the coffin arms so there will be only partial constraint of the LCA with a solid thrust bushing.
Vendors claim there is negligible increased NVH, likely for the same reasons, and therefore recommend them for Street as well as track applications.
How elasto-kinematic toe change works in Porsche suspensions | Tech Tactics
tl;dr: the rubber bits in Porsche suspension arms are designed to sharpen cornering (in addition to the NVH and other stuff).
You Tube
That's interesting. He's saying that rubber bushings are not a compromise, they are a benefit at speed and claiming that they improve geometry/handling. How does that explain using spherical joints and eliminating rubber connections?
That aside, I'm still going to install my coffin arms and keep the stock rubber thrust bushings until otherwise.
Haven't watched the video (yet) but elasto-kinematics are designed such, that lift-off oversteer is reduced by reducing the corner outside front wheel's steering (more precisely put: tyre slip) angle. For that you need an elastic joint.That elasticity dulls the response to driver inputs (as well as the vehicle's reaction to any disturbances).
A solid spherical joint doesn't allow for elasto-kinematics and the driver himself has to reduce front axle side force by reducing the steering wheel angle in case of lift-off oversteer.
Reason to install solid bushes, spherical joints and the like, is the improved/shorter response time to driver inputs. A (very) good driver can drive a course with direction changes in short succession quicker with solid bushes and spherical joints than with rubber bushes. His effort to keep the car under control will rise as a direct consequence of the improved response time, however.
Solid bushings/sphericals/etc are for survival as much as they are for making the car respond faster to driver inputs. The guy's right, the correct design of rubber bushings is often the secret sauce to making a factory car handle way better than its spec suggests. The problem is that if you want to go "sports driving" and push limits, you're using stickier tires than the factory intended, so 1) the tires are now faster than the chassis, and 2) the factory bushings will literally tear and/or collapse under a few hours of >1G loads. Some of the cars I've raced on rubber bushings would enter the track with 0 toe and come off with 1/2" of toe in. Fresh rubber to bushing failure in 20min.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.