17 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHeBay RGT 2001
Leading reported evidence
Set colors
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Arguably they were using ill-timed farts to set the colors.
Leading evidence: 'Set colors' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Set colors' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Arguably they were using ill-timed farts to set the colors.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
17 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T174436Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Was surfing on eBay and found this 996. Like the exterior color though the interior color leaves something to be desired.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Porsche-911-...m=142019364445
Exterior is cool although a bit too attention-grabbing for me. I like the rims, body kit and overall stance, too. The rhubarb 'n' custard interior is vomit-inducing though.
I agree. I like everything but the interior, but just tint the windows dark and keep your eyes on the road ahead and all is well.
This is a very nice price for a rare and high performance(relatively speaking in the GT3 territory) car. I might even say I'd rather have this than pay $20-$30k more for a MK2 GT3 model.
Seriously fugly interior. But somebody liked it enough to specify it. No doubt the folks in Stuttgart are still laughing (or horrified) over that order).
I might even say I'd rather have this than pay $20-$30k more for a MK2 GT3 model
As the owner of a MK II GT3, I'd say "Spend the extra $$" Just my opinion.
Well the RUF got more exclusivity, the same tub and engine as the GT3, and basically the same suspension and brakes as the GT3, so for me the exclusivity wins out. Not to mention with the savings, I can buy a loaded
Miata.
Retail on this was $250k btw. :wow:
Orange over burgundy and tan with a brown headliner? Someone was using darts to choose colors?
After seeing some of the factory color options, I can only guess that Porsche upholsterers are all guys like me who have no idea what colors go together, so they just shrug and do whatever the build sheet says.
The interior of that car looks like a 70's **** set.
My former employer has one of these. I think he said Ruf only built 15 or 16 RGTs. Those aren't the factory wheels. Car had MK1 GT3 running gear, though I think the engine puts out slightly more HP.
