17 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHThey done gone and did it! New 911T
Leading reported evidence
Test cases in marketing classes
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The 991 R and now 991 T can be taught as test cases in marketing classes.
Leading evidence: 'Test cases in marketing classes' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test cases in marketing classes' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
17 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T220748Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Just a few weeks ago I was talking with my brother about (and I think posted here) how Porsche should make a new 911T, a stripped out, light weight, no frills, no excessive creature comforts and electrical gadgets car. Well they just announced it, and I love everything about it, except for the price. Classic Porsche, give you less, charge you more. I mean, I know they're brilliant, and people will line up and then trample one another to fork over their money for an order. But seriously, 103,000 for this car seems silly. I say they should have priced it closer to a no option Cayman S, which retails around 66 grand I think. Mark it ten grand more and you have yourself more orders than you'll be able to fill. Anyhow, I'm still excited for it. I love the trend that Porsche is going in with a lighter weight more driver pleasure orientated car, which seems to be the soul of Porsche (or at least used to be). And because I'm poor and drive a poverty package 996, I just hope the values on these plummet in say six years or so and I can pick one up for thirty grand. Wishful thinking, I know. I actually think it will be the opposite. As more and more electric and more automated driving iPhones are on the road I think people will yearn for that pure driving experience and everything that is a manual transmission and not run by Steve Jobs' uploaded brain will become more valueable. Which also really will probably dash my hopes of getting an air cooled 911 (thanks Magnus!).
http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2...rformance.html
Carrera T - 3,142 pounds
Base Carrera - 3,153 pounds
Carrera S - 3,175 pounds
Carrera GTS - 3,197 pounds
Saving 10 lbs and having no radio doesn't sound like much of a good time. Something tells me the GTS would mop the floor with this, and play music on the way home.
Agreed, the GTS has 80 more ponies and is marginally heavier, it would certainly be faster in every way. And with the GTS pricing starting at $119,000 it is the better choice. Which is why I wish the T was priced better, it just doesn't make sense to price it that close to the GTS.
911T is typical Porsche marketing: creating an unlimited amount of limited editions
The weight reduction is probably more then 10lbs. But it has a mechanical LSD that adds again 22lbs or so.
All this considering whether the driver is a fat ***. Just lose 10lbs lay off the burritos.
btw check out the slats on the deck lid they are vertical and look bad.
msrp $102,100
I like the idea of giving the market a relatively inexpensive, performance spec'd 911. 3142lbs against 370bhp is pretty good stuff with a good suspension. It's a little surprising they couldn't move the needle on weight a bit more for $100k. Maybe a few iterations down the road they'll give more engineering budget to lower weight?
I love the idea of a "inexpensive" and light weight, bare bones 911. It really cannot cost that much more to produce than say a Cayman S. I just don't know why they can't price it a little more appropriately (or at least what I would consider appropriate for a car with no radio).
Porsche is brilliant at marketing; that's why they have the highest profit margins on every car they sell out of all auto makers.
The 991 R and now 991 T can be taught as test cases in marketing classes.
I think this being a "stripper 911" is or even a "lightweight" Carrera is a bit of a misnomer or maybe a Porsche marketing bungle.
Looking at the actual features shows the 911T provides a way to get the PASM sport suspension, diff and a reduced final drive in a car with the base engine. You're still paying for them over the base car, but at least you can have them now. As far as I can tell the PASM sport suspension isn't even an option on the base Carrera for 2018, same with diff. You're also paying for some aero bits and the sport seats (and the option to upgrade to the the hardback sport seats). They also threw in some thinner glass and door pulls to make it feel more special, but that is all anyone seems to concentrate on.
From looking at the Porsche website, the GTS' $120k price doesn't include the PASM sport suspension as standard. It's an option available bundled with PDCC.
TLDR this is not a stripped car. This is a Carrera tailored to the enthusiast with some specific performance options. Why would that be cheaper than the base car? Whether it is a good value compared to the S or GTS is another argument I suppose
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.