fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Reverting from H&R back to stock?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHReverting from H&R back to stock?

Leading reported evidence

Use ones

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Are "stock" springs available, or am I better off looking for used ones?

Reverting from H&R back to stock?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use ones' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use ones' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 10 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use ones

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Are "stock" springs available, or am I better off looking for used ones?

Reverting from H&R back to stock?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T205155Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Brought my 996 to work for the first time today and ... it doesn't like the ramp down to my car park at all. Or rather, it really doesn't like the ramp up again, as I found out when I took a colleague out for a ride at lunchtime. The car park attendant suggested taking the ramp at an angle when I leave this evening, which I'll try. But I'm wondering if I need to consider a suspension "downgrade". I like the look of the car with the H&Rs but if I have to raise it a little so be it. Are "stock" springs available, or am I better off looking for used ones? From what I've read, swapping the springs out looks to be doable although if I decide it needs done quickly I might just get a local indy to do it. Cheers! [edit: thought it might help if I explain that the problem has to do with the ramp having a couple of "steps" in the middle, so it looks like this - not to scale, obviously!]: Code: ___________ / __/ / __/ / / ____/

POST 2Original post

youre going to gain about 1/2 - 3/4 " I think your driving ability would make a bigger difference in scraping than raising the car. for my car its maybe a 95% issue that there would be a small scrape from the way I drive up on an obstacle as opposed to a %5 issue that the car was too low

POST 5 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Yeah sorry about my crappy artwork. Hopefully you get the idea. Anyway it turns out the car park attendant was spot on. I took the ramp slowly at a 45 degree angle and all was fine. He tells me "that's what the other Porsche does". OKB - looks like you were right Buzz - the H&Rs appear to have earned a temporary reprieve. I'll let you know if I change my mind. Thanks y'all!

POST 6Original post

If you are used to the H&R springs I would think you would probably hate stock.

POST 8Original post

stock these cars have a hideous wheel gap.... Learn to drive with H&R and be happy!

POST 9Original post

I have a suspension stock setup 2003 996 C2 Coupe, springs, shocks sway bars and strut mounts, will be traveling your way in a few weeks.

POST 10Original post

Whilst we are on the topic of grinding the front end...anyone gone with a front end lift kit to solve this issue? Experiences to share? Car Graphic: Cargraphic airlift kit on Porsche 997 Twin Turbo @ SharkWerks - YouTube KW: KW Coilovers Lift System HLS 2 Porsche 997 Turbo S - YouTube

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.