15 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHGreat Deal
Leading reported evidence
Replace i'm assuming there will be some carfax details
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Since it's been rebuilt well enough to have the title changed, I'm assuming there will be some Carfax details.
Leading evidence: 'Replace i'm assuming there will be some carfax details' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace i'm assuming there will be some carfax details' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I'm sort of reading it as "rebuilt" means just what was alluded to above -- out with the crashed parts and in with the new (or used?) to get it past inspection and out of there.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Hmm, maybe "Rebuilt" just means that, over the years, the previous owners have replaced all of its original parts?
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
So, apparently as you drive it, the car makes you think about replacing perfectly good parts before they break because, at some point, they
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I'm sort of reading it as "rebuilt" means just what was alluded to above -- out with the crashed parts and in with the new (or used?) to get it past inspection and out of there.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T165820Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Terrific price or awful price. Depending on if you are a Buyer or Seller.
http://seattle.craigslist.org/see/cto/5597672030.html
I have no connection to the Seller. Just noticed it on CL.
Addendum: Just noticed the "rebuilt" status. Whatever that means in WA.
Looks like quite a nasty smash:
http://www.carsalvageyards.info/salv...-1/g-14564793/
EDIT - My bad, this is not the same car - I got my CarFax reports mixed up. Please disregard!
"Rebuilt" is what you get after you put a "salvage" title car back together well enough to pass state inspection.
He talks the talk of a 996 owner ("selling to upgrade to a Turbo")...
It would be fun to see the Carfax on this one. Since it's been rebuilt well enough to have the title changed, I'm assuming there will be some Carfax details.
<BR>And yet, he also talks the talk of a used car salesman out to make a quick buck off an unsuspecting buyer. "Drives like a Porsche should drive." What a bunch of crap.
So, apparently as you drive it, the car makes you think about replacing perfectly good parts before they break because, at some point, they
might
break (and
then
what would you have?).
Hmm, maybe "Rebuilt" just means that, over the years, the previous owners have replaced all of its original parts?
Question about wheels, can someone explain to me, how come those Turbo wheels sometimes look like they fit perfectly on a MK1 and on others they stick out past the fenders in the back? I have a deal here locally that is tempting but I wish they would fit like the ones on CL
Because the one's in the ad are specifically turbo II twist for narrow body(NB) models with the higher rear offsets. Most of the turbo II twist models out there are for widebody, which are more common.
Could be. I'm sort of reading it as "rebuilt" means just what was alluded to above -- out with the crashed parts and in with the new (or used?) to get it past inspection and out of there.
So he can buy that new Turbo.
Right-e-o.
