fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Need crankshaft carrier line bored

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHNeed crankshaft carrier line bored

Leading reported evidence

Repair crank

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

I had the crank repaired and nitrited by marine Crankshaft in Santa Ana and they did an awesome job.

Need crankshaft carrier line bored
Frequently discussed work

Repair (as is the crank)

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I would be more concerned about the damage to the Thrust faces as this is difficult to repair (as is the crank).

Need crankshaft carrier line bored
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Repair crank' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Repair (as is the crank)' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 13 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Repair (as is the crank)

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I would be more concerned about the damage to the Thrust faces as this is difficult to repair (as is the crank).

Need crankshaft carrier line bored
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Repair (as is the crank)

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I would be more concerned about the damage to the Thrust faces as this is difficult to repair (as is the crank).

Need crankshaft carrier line bored

Repair crank

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

I had the crank repaired and nitrited by marine Crankshaft in Santa Ana and they did an awesome job.

Need crankshaft carrier line bored
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T113718Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

My 03 c2 suffered a failed thrust bearing and one main bearing. I had the crank repaired and nitrited by marine Crankshaft in Santa Ana and they did an awesome job. The crankshaft looks brand new. I was inspecting the carrier and noticed the (not sure of correct term) bearing cradle for tje failed bearing was discolored and has shrunk in diameter ever so slightly. Laying the crank in one side of the carrier with all the bearings in, the crank binds and will not turn. Take out the one bearing and it turns smoothly. Now I need to have that cradle bored and need some suugestions of any machine shops that can do it. I am in Tampa Florida but don't mind shipping it.

POST 2Original post

you are not doing this rebuild yourself are you ?

POST 3Original post

My 3.4 is being rebuilt for the same thing, although I opted for a new (second hand) crankshaft and carrier as this is the "best advice". I would be more concerned about the damage to the Thrust faces as this is difficult to repair (as is the crank). You can find second hand crank carriers for reasonable money on ebay. This one in Quebec is from a 3.6 (so they told me when I was looking). http://www.ebay.ca/itm/Porsche-911-9...xWL7Cd&vxp=mtr

POST 4Original post

When re-machining the crank carrier on an m96 engine there are a few unique problems that will be encountered. Since there is no bearings available with a larger "OD" the carrier cannot be just bore out to the next size, the mating surfaces have to be machined to effectively reduce the bore size so that it can be bored to original size bearings. After the mating surfaces have been machined, now the overall width has been reduced and the carrier will no longer seal to the inside of the case halves. To make the carrier seal to the inside of the case halves the cases mating surfaces will have to be machines to compensate. After the case halves mating surfaces have been machined, now the cases have to be line-bored. Then after all that the overall width of the cases have been reduced and the pistons will come closer to hitting the heads and will need to be checked to ensure sufficient piston to head clearance. And if not sufficient piston domes will need fly-cut. So you can see this can be very complicated and become very expensive with that much machining. Best choice is like Montychristo said, just get a known good carrier !!

POST 5 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks for the input. A replacement carrier is the economical choice.

POST 6Original post

Double check this main journal and insure it is round and there is no runout.

POST 7 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Are the carriers the same for the 01 Boxster S and 03 996? My part numbers are: 996 101 157 2R and 996 101 158 2R

POST 8Original post

Talk to Hoffman Automotive Machine ? http://hamheads.com/aboutus.php

POST 9Original post

Quotes source post: 14537781

No. Those numbers are casting numbers and not actual part numbers. according to PET The 03 996 3.6 (m96/03) came with part number 996-101-057-03 that supersedes to 996-101-007-03 The 01 986s 3.2 (m96/21) came with part number 996-101-012-64 that supersedes to 996-101-007-09

POST 10Original post

I believe that the Boxster S (2.7-3.2) parts fit 3.4, not sure about the 3.6 though. The journals are larger. This is entirely based on trying to find one for my 3.4 motor. DC Automotive probably have some, but they were a bit "spendy" for me.

POST 11Original post

I don't think you need to machine out the journal on the carrier, the steel insert has just expanded a little with the heat and is now smaller than it was , when the bearing is sitting inside and is tightened up with the crank there is insufficient clearance causing the crank to bind, I would just get it honed to the same size as the one next door if possible by a machine shop and I would think that will sort it? Unless it's too far out of round?

POST 12 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I believe it may be out of round. I was able to source one locally. Should have it in a couple days.

POST 13Original post

Ask Jake Raby for his input... he might have something laying around for you in his shop...

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.