14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 detailing advice for paint protection
Leading reported evidence
Install by the po
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Install by the po' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install by the po' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
A quality multi-step detail that includes wash clay polish sealant wax could run anywhere from $175 - $600, average $250 - $325.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'd love to answer your question with a lot of detail, but I can't without seeing the car or you posting a lot of detailed pics using a flourescent or LED light to bring out the swirls/scratches.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
My rule of thumb is that anyone who uses the term "buffed" or "buffing" is going to damage your paint with rubbing compound, a big wool pad, and too much pressure applied on what will probably be a huge high-speed rotary tool intended for heavy body work.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Anyone who uses the term "paint correction" is going to do a correct decontamination, and then lightly polish using a foam pad (and these days probably a nice random orbital like a Rupes Bigfoot), removing just enough clearcoat as necessary to achieve a good finish.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'd love to answer your question with a lot of detail, but I can't without seeing the car or you posting a lot of detailed pics using a flourescent or LED light to bring out the swirls/scratches.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
My rule of thumb is that anyone who uses the term "buffed" or "buffing" is going to damage your paint with rubbing compound, a big wool pad, and too much pressure applied on what will probably be a huge high-speed rotary tool intended for heavy body work.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Anyone who uses the term "paint correction" is going to do a correct decontamination, and then lightly polish using a foam pad (and these days probably a nice random orbital like a Rupes Bigfoot), removing just enough clearcoat as necessary to achieve a good finish.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T150039Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Greetings everyone! So, I got my first 996.It is the Millennium edition with Pedro's DOF solution for IMS. I am taking it for detailing coming weekend and would like to get your advice. It has got the original special Violet Chromaflair metallic paint. So I have few questions:
1) Will buffing damage the paint or end up leading to wrong paint meter depth readings in future?
2) Or do you suggest that I should just tell the shop to hand wash and wax it and leave it at that ?
3) Any opinion if I they ask me to do ceramic coating or nano coating or something similar ?
Obviously I did not buy it for investment but at the same time I do not want to deliberately do something to reduce the value in future by being unable to prove that the paint is original.
Best.
I'd love to answer your question with a lot of detail, but I can't without seeing the car or you posting a lot of detailed pics using a flourescent or LED light to bring out the swirls/scratches.
Hi sasilverbullet - My question was kind of general Q&A. Cons of buffing, ceramic coating etc. ( I read a lot about the pros through the marketing material of the product vendors). Never paid too much attention to factory paints before, but since this was an exclusive option, am sure it would not be appreciated by the community if I damage it due to my limited knowledge about car detailing and paints.
While my car is not chromaflair, I’m very happy with the Kenzo coating my detailed applied a few weeks ago.
Water beads like magic and the paint shines better than new.
It also protects the paint.
I think it is actually a VERY good idea to ceramic or nano coat to protect Chromaflair.
If you are taking the vehicle to an experienced and well regarded detail shop, then no, they are not going to damage your paint. A quality multi-step detail that includes wash clay polish sealant wax could run anywhere from $175 - $600, average $250 - $325. I would not perform a ceramic coating on this vehicle.
I�d do it once, then take better care of it than the previous owner.
My car�s POs took great care of mine, but I still had a 3 Stage paint restoration done anyways.
It looked a lot better afterwards.
I have a clear bra, installed by the PO.
I had the coating added to protect the paint.
I�m having my Mk1 aerokit spoiler painted tomorrow, and plan to have it coated as soon as the painter says it can be, or when my detailer says it can be.
I paint corrected my own, after a lot of studying on detailer's domain and a lot of practice on junkyard panels, my old 944, etc. When I had to appraised for trade-in, the people at Brumos were stunned at how good it looked, and how even the paint depth reading was across the whole car.
My rule of thumb is that anyone who uses the term "buffed" or "buffing" is going to damage your paint with rubbing compound, a big wool pad, and too much pressure applied on what will probably be a huge high-speed rotary tool intended for heavy body work. These are the guys that burn through your clearcoat and then try to cover up their mistakes with Glaze (which works really well for a few months only).
Anyone who uses the term "paint correction" is going to do a correct decontamination, and then lightly polish using a foam pad (and these days probably a nice random orbital like a Rupes Bigfoot), removing just enough clearcoat as necessary to achieve a good finish.
Either way, you are removing some clearcoat whenever you polish. But, no amount of glaze or fancy ceramic coating will ever level out scratches and swirls like a good paint correction will. Adding a good coating *after* a thorough paint correct will be stunning and give you fantastic protection, however.
Nothing will damage your paint like a hack "detailer" will.
There is a detailing subforum on here that has loads of info as well.
And in regards to nano/ceramic coatings: they are awesome, and they are worth it if you plan to keep the car, but *only* if an excellent paint correction is done first. They are not magic potions.
I am a big fan of ceramic coating and rinseless washes with the Optimum products. I have had several cars coated and then maintained them myself and have been very pleased w/ the results and how it has held up. Mine have all been with OptiCoat Pro+.
+1 on what has been said above about EXCELLENT paint correction prior to coating the car.
I recently helped my friend paint correct his inherited 996.
Here are the steps I used:
Chemical decontamination with fallout remover - you cannot imagine how much iron particles are all over your car
2 washes with a pH neutral foam cannon wash
Clay bar with a synthetic clay pad and lots of quick detailer
Compounded with 3D HD Cut + with Orange cut Pad
Polished with 3D HD Polish + with Green polish Pad
Then I rinsed the car and surface prepped with water + IPA
Finally, I topped everything off with CQuartz UK + Reload ceramic coating
Definitely definitely get a random orbital!
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.