13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNumeric shifter which hole setting did u use?
Leading reported evidence
Replace started out
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I had started out with the lowest and changed it to middle.
Leading evidence: 'Replace started out' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace started out' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
So the instructions say most people use the middle hole but it seams the throw is longer then the agency power short shift that was in the car before the swap.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
So the instructions say most people use the middle hole but it seams the throw is longer then the agency power short shift that was in the car before the swap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T022239Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
So the instructions say most people use the middle hole but it seams the throw is longer then the agency power short shift that was in the car before the swap. What setting have u guys used?
I had started out with the lowest and changed it to middle.
The lowest setting takes a little more effort than I what I wanted for a daily driver.
I did not have to cut carpet as other threads have stated.
I like the shifter, but I am very unhappy with numeric cables.
The noise that resonates in the cabin from the cables is horrible. The worst modification I did on my car.
I wraped mine with the numeric silicon hose and i dont think there is any added noise. I get the mechanical clunck when i shift but no vibe, buzz or drone. I do have an extra length of the hose because i ordered 2 thinking i needed one for each cable but 1 length is good for both cables. I would flat rate the hose for $25 if anyone wants it.
Middle. I tried to use the shortest throw setting - but as was stated already - the effort wasn't worth it. I found it to be more precise in the middle.
I guess ill leave it in the middle since its seems to be the most benificial position. I have has some interest on the extra piece of hose and i have replied to the pm's.
extra piece has been sold, thx
I also was unhappy with the added noise from the numeric cables. i reached out to Dan at Numeric and he advised adding a rubber fuel hose over the cables at the exposed areas under the car. Also re positioned the cables to make sure they weren't resting on any under panels of the car. It made a huge difference. I would say still noiser than stock but definitely not objectionable. I also now have a lift which makes access 5 million times easier than when I installed it on jack stands in my old garage. After driving with this load noise for several years, its worth the effort to take another stab at fixing it!
