12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHIMS Bearing replacement from Germany?
Leading reported evidence
Install (along
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Knock $5k off the asking price, and have "The Solution" installed (along with the other "while you're in there" maintenance items)...
Leading evidence: 'Install (along' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is '$185 pelican bearing' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Install (along' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Heck, I don't even want another problem prone bearing from Porsche installed on any of my cars.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Unless you have sump dropped, filter cut open and all good, PLUS budgeted LN product installed properly, move on.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I'd be more concerned with when and why was it replaced then what was it replaced with.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I'd be more concerned with when and why was it replaced then what was it replaced with.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T183130Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Just curious if anyone is familiar with an IMS replacement kit that is manufactured in Germany.
I'm looking at a 996 C4 that apparently had the IMS, RMS and clutch done last year. The invoice for the work simply states "Engine Bearing Upgrade kit" for which the current owner was charged $700 (for the part).
I asked for more information about this part, so the seller contacted the shop. The shop owner/mechanic said it is a "German" part. I'm not familiar with any German made IMS solution.
Am I being unreasonable to be asking exactly which IMS solution was used? I feel the description on the invoice is way to vague, and the seller has a right to know what part they paid $700 for, whether I buy the car or not.
Fvd brombacher offers a double row ims bearing from or made in Germany (at least the cover is):
https://www.fvd.net/de-en/FVD10590104/reparatursatz-zwischenwelle-m96doppel-lager.html
Also as a single row ceramic:
https://www.fvd.net/de-en/FVD10590103/reparatursatz-zwischenwelle-m96einzel-lager-ceramic.html
Neither of them are $700 though, but who knows after import , sales tax and shop mark-up.
Of course you can ask the shop exactly which bearing was fitted but how reliable will the answer be as he probably won't remember and looking at the description on the bill I doubt he keeps more detailed information in his business book keepings where he would look into as to not query his memory.
I'd ask which bearing exactly he would fit when a customer turns up with the request to replace and upgrade the imsb. Chances are that's the one in the car you're looking into.
"Am I being unreasonable to be asking exactly which IMS solution was used? I feel the description on the invoice is way to vague, and the seller has a right to know what part they paid $700 for, whether I buy the car or not."
No, not for yourself as a buyer, but it appears the seller has no interest in knowing what they paid $700 for other than the IMSB was replaced. Seems to me they just had the shop replace it and so...there ya go. What I would do is try to get the price down to cover the install of the Solution and be done with it. If they don't budge, move on to the next one.
Please clarify. Are you saying the shop said they installed a German made "IMS Solution" as in the LN product? Or, are you using the word "solution" as in an answer to the IMS problem?
At this point and time, I wouldn't trust any IMS bearing product unless the shop could verify that it was an official LN manufactured. Heck, I don't even want another problem prone bearing from Porsche installed on any of my cars.
I used the word solution as an answer to the problem, not the product name.
To me, the mechanic is being very vague with regard to which bearing he used. "German" is not an answer. I think he keeps saying that to satisfy the seller, as he wants her to think the $700 was justified for a "German", "Genuine Porsche" part.
Since it's a 2001, it could be a single row or double row. Since he installed it, I'm tempted to ask him which it is. When it comes to mechanical work, I like to know what is going in my vehicles. Sometimes I do request the old parts for my own inspection.
This guy is dodging the question. If he did it at all, I'm guessing it was the $185 Pelican bearing that he charged $700 for.
I couldn't trust that bearing/install based on info you are given.
Unless you have sump dropped, filter cut open and all good, PLUS budgeted LN product installed properly, move on. That car is nothing special color/option wise.
"This guy is dodging the question. If he did it at all, I'm guessing it was the $185 Pelican bearing that he charged $700 for."
^^This^^... Knock $5k off the asking price, and have "The Solution" installed (along with the other "while you're in there" maintenance items)... Otherwise walk...
In my opinion if the IMS bearing that was used was NOT an LN Engineering IMS bearing, I would not consider it sufficiently replaced.
If I were to buy that car, the IMS bearing would have to be replaced very soon.
Whether the new IMS bearing had 50K or just 500 miles on it, it would be replaced with an LN Engineering bearing.
If I were keeping it long-term, or the car was in excellent shape and I was flipping it, I would install the IMS Solution.
Based on the information Jake Raby and PCA shared on their IMS bearing videos, the dual row bearing was phased out in mid-year 2000. Therefore, the 2001 will have the most problem prone bearing of all three generations.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
