103 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHSoon to be new owner of a 99!
Leading reported evidence
Check manufacture date and it was 04/98
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
So, I checked the manufacture date and it was 04/98...
Leading evidence: 'Check manufacture date and it was 04/98' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check engine serial' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I have the repair receipt from the dealer who did it and it seems to indicate it was replaced with a remanufactured '01 engine in March '04.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I like the spin-on filter adapter - I am not a fan of the plastic housing and diddling around with the filter elements, and I felt like I was on the verge of breaking it every time I changed the oil.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
For what it's worth - I bought my '99 with NO records, with NO inspection (I took it in to my indie for a post-purchase inspection so I would have a baseline for what I'd gotten myself into, so I was relieved when it came back with a clean bill of health).
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
For what it's worth - I bought my '99 with NO records, with NO inspection (I took it in to my indie for a post-purchase inspection so I would have a baseline for what I'd gotten myself into, so I was relieved when it came back with a clean bill of health).
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I like the spin-on filter adapter - I am not a fan of the plastic housing and diddling around with the filter elements, and I felt like I was on the verge of breaking it every time I changed the oil.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
103 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T201111Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Deposit paid, PPI done and I'm picking her up in the morning.
I'm already digging through the forum for info! I can't wait to compare this to the EvoX I had.
No, I didn't learn of the option sticker until after I visited the dealer. I'll definitely take a pic and post it up tomorrow!
Thanks for all the comments, definitely seems like a good forum to be on!
Normally, I'd pass this off as bs... but with all that I've been through with the PPI and the hour drive to the dealer, you did have me going for a minute
Yea, I had a sense you were still vulnerable since the dealer still had it on their website. I couldn't help myself. Sorry, it was cruel, but glad I didn't give you heart failure. ha!
I know the feeling. I was about to purchase a car, and when I went to pay for it, the dealer sold it up under my feet. I was ready to kill somebody. hahaha Anyway, hope you enjoy the car!
I agree completely, there wasn't much I couldn't beat when it came to curves stock with bolt ons. It was just all the damn electronics, and maintenance... hell more insurance $$ than this car by 10x!
I wanted to go back to basics... rwd, naturally aspirated, and the old school throttle... just like my e30 beater but but better!
A hell of an experience driving this wonderful machine made by unicorn blood!
Finally got her home, and I have to say this is night and day over the Evo!
I don't miss the bucking of the Evo at all, just hate the sticky radio *****. I may have to upgrade the stereo system, but nothing silly... want to keep the weight down
I was going to keep this as a weekend car, but I don't think that is going to happen.
I've always hated driving a stick in traffic, but this makes it worth it. I'm doing my best do to avoid modding it, but it won't last long... I can feel it calling me.
I can't believe I'm considering on making this my daily driver, my E30 is crying right now
One of the few notable differences between the Evo X and the 996 is the steering response. A smaller steering wheel seems to be a step in the right direction, any other ideas?
I'm not looking to get at the same level, just any improvements would be helpful.
Oh, and let's just say the 996 is better already because of one thing I hated in the Evo. First and second gear would buck like hell, could not drive smooth at a slow speed. The 996 is great for driving, even given traffic.
The Evo is so much more responsive. So much that you have to be careful not to over turn in circumstances that could cause a disaster. I bet the steering response is the reason the insurance is so high on the Evo.
I don't want that level, but something close to it would be great. I'm already looking for a lighter smaller steering wheel and anything I can do enhance the steering ratio.
That's something I've also noticed. Steering effort is pretty light due to the lack of weight over the front axle, but definitely not all that quick. It's fine for day to day driving, but on technical sections of road, I find myself shuffling my hands on the wheel more often than I'd prefer.
Driving it smoothly at low speeds is a bit of a challenge though, the clutch engagement is a bit sensitive I feel like. Or maybe I'm just not used to it.
Hmmm, ok. I find the steering on the 996 (I've got a C4 so a little different than C2) to be super responsive with lots of road feel/feedback. I've never driven a EVO so I can't draw a direct comparison. This being said, why would anyone want a vehicle to have steering as you described above? It sounds uncomfortable and potentially dangerous according to your description...
[Image-only post; no author-written text. Original image references:]
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/600x315/that_escalated_quickly_8259f1332a3185b22bada7a5612e713ff3839848.jpg
The Evo had the dreaded curse of blowing up if you were driving up hill in 5th gear at 60mph, especially if you had the AC on. Anything like that with the 996?
No, nothing like that. Well, unless you have slicks on and you happen to be driving a track with extended high-speed sweeping turns. In that case, yes, it is exactly like driving up a hill in 5th gear at 60MPH in an Evo.
Point of order: Does it cost $20K to rebuild an Evo engine? If so, the similarities are becoming eerie.
10k + for stock engine (unless you DIY), 20k is definitely in the numbers if it's anything other than a stock engine.
Not to mention, the dreaded oil issue... can't take banked curves without extra mods. Hell, with a moderate power add you can get the oil starvation coming off the starting line too.
Now you're down the road of slicks... with slicks on the evo, you have to be worried about busting the differential or even the trans on a hard start if you haven't upgraded.
Ok, I'm sold! This is by far better than the evo. Granted the acceleration of the evo was better, but that also made it less controllable. I can't believe I can get over 100 in 3rd without hitting 7k RPM, 3rd topped around 80ish in the evo... which means less shifting.
There are so many things I like better, and I'm comparing a car just a few years old to one that is 16.
I'll live with the expensive oil changes and coolant changes. I'm just afraid of the dreaded IMS, guess I'll change it at 100k unless I can confirm it was already done (which I'm working on).
Thanks for the reassurance, it definitely eases my mind
Ok, time for some more forum searching. I'm already planning a repair it fund to begin very soon. Hopefully, it won't turn into a modding fund. Thankfully, I've got my trustworthy E30 on the sidelines.
Ok you've got me worried about my engine now, thanks! The PPI included this part:
Very slight oil seep on Bank 2 valve cover
They said this was normal for a 16yr old car, tell me your thoughts.
Sorry man, didn't mean to do that...
I freaked myself out for a bit there too. But some of these forum guys have made me wise in the ways of 996 ownership - the mantra is "Just drive the car."
Don't forget D-chunk. The 99s may have the best IMSB, but they also love the D-chunk
Sorry Ivan, couldn't resist. There's far too much to stress over, especially since the occurrence rate isn't that high. Just drive it and enjoy, that's the key
Thanks, I'm not that worried about the engine. It's a two owner car with a ton of service records through carfax. I've been driving her every day since ownership, so I'm doing my best!
Went to pull my center caps off my wheels today, and an emblem came off. I guess it's time for some 3M double stick. In addition, a brake light went out.... gotta check that out tomorrow.
Is the L&N Spin On Adapter worth the price? It seems pricey for what it is... but what the F do I know?
My '99 needed a cam cover re-seal on one bank for the same reason (seeping oil). It is a common issue.
For what it's worth - I bought my '99 with NO records, with NO inspection (I took it in to my indie for a post-purchase inspection so I would have a baseline for what I'd gotten myself into, so I was relieved when it came back with a clean bill of health).
I like the spin-on filter adapter - I am not a fan of the plastic housing and diddling around with the filter elements, and I felt like I was on the verge of breaking it every time I changed the oil. If I get some better filtration due to the LN unit and spin-on filters, good on me.
There will definitely be some odds-and-ends to address - but that's just a fact of life for a car that's pushing 17 years old. All things considered, I've been very happy with the car's reliability - my wife's 4-year-old Nissan has spent far more time in the service bay than my 996 has in the same 4 years...
with a strong wallet, I ll know more tomorrow. My mechanic (newly acquired) is going to giver her the once over tomorrow and if all checks out then we have a deal in the am. Anything particular I should mention ? All service records are accounted for and it is below 50k miles. This owner # 2 had it for 8 years .
Well got the car and just having a bitch of a time with getting the pics loaded. The wrench gave it the thumbs up. Put some miles on her and all looks good !
Looks great! Love the black wheels and yellow calipers. FYI, yellow denotes Porsche Carbon Ceramic Breaks (PCCB) so be prepared to be asked a few times if you have them.
Also, you can't upload pics with the mobile app as far as I can tell. You have to use your browser to upload from your phone.
This squirrel appears to have found the right nutz. D Chunk and back, thx much for the welcome. I was wondering why the yellow , appreciate the info. BTW have not had an oil pressure gage before so on the freeway or higher rpm's pegs at 5 often ...... correct ? Thinking CAI and exhaust next. More pics coming
Ha, we're on the same path! I just looked this up:
With a warmed-up engine and at a speed of 5k rpm, the engine oil pressure should be approx 3.5 bar.
If the oil pressure drops abruptly and the warning light comes on while the engine is running or driving, bail the f.u.c.k out!
With the gauge provided by stock, it's not designed to show an excessively high pressure but a drop in the pressure... correct me if I'm wrong guys.
I had an oil pressure gauge on the evo, nice to see it stock on the 996 and not an add on!
On another note, I can't believe how much oil and coolant she takes!
So happy to find an indi shop! I was getting quotes from $1000 to $1700 for the 60k service... finally found a shop by referral and I was out the door $460!!!
How did you determine the replacement engine had a single row bearing?
I have a '99 with a replacement engine installed in '04. I would love to know what bearing mine has now.
If it was done in 2004, assume it has single and and not double.. Keep in mind that the failures were not well know back then so when rebuilding they probably thought single row was just dandy. I have the old single row on my desk now LOL. Only found out when it was pulled to upgrade it. It was perfectly fine by the way.
The myth that all 99 cars are double row only applies if it is the original engine. If the engine serial as an"AT" in it is is a remanufactured one. Consider both factors..
Thanks, I figured you pulled yours out, and that's how you knew.
I have the repair receipt from the dealer who did it and it seems to indicate it was replaced with a remanufactured '01 engine in March '04. Question is, when was the engine reman'd, in '01, '02, '03, or '04? I only know when it was put in my car. It could have been reman'd in '01 and sat in inventory for 3 years. Or reman'd in '02 and sat for 2 years. The earlier the engine was reman'd the more I would assume it was given a single row since that was what they were using then.
Oh well. "996's are like a box of chocolates, ya never know what you're gonna get."
Damn, still loving it though!
Today was the first day I got the *** out a little bit...
I have never got an erection and s.h.i.t myself at the same time... except for the one time in Bulgaria
Whoever said this was a driver's car is right, night and day with the nanny electronics of the Evo X
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
