24 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHReflector back on C4/C4S for the 2009 997 (MK II)
Leading reported evidence
Replace handle (is
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'm not a fan of the lights or the reflector or of Tim changing his handle (Is that even possible anymore?), but I do have a mac and I could see the image fine (in Safari)
Leading evidence: 'Replace handle (is' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace handle (is' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I actually started a thread and asked for opinions on changing LVDell to NCDell but the choice was made clear by my constituents to keep LVDell.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Thanks, I have my first test with it this weekend.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Replace handle (is
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'm not a fan of the lights or the reflector or of Tim changing his handle (Is that even possible anymore?), but I do have a mac and I could see the image fine (in Safari)
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
24 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T150451Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
The 2009 model year of the 997 C4/C4S has a reflector on the rear deck lid. I know that many of you liked the reflector on the 996 C4/C4S and bemoned the demise of the reflector on the initial 997 models.
Just curious to hear what you guys think of the new reflector?
Tim, you gonna change your userID?
BTW, here's what it looks like on my screen right now. I've never seen problems like this on Rennlist. No pics showing up today. Some avatars are missing (blue box with question mark in it), PM down for several hours. Damn! Makes you really appreciate the hard work that John and Jenn put into RL when they owned the site.
Im with you on this... Ive been getting this for a couple of days now. Been really flakey... database errors, slow, missing attached pics.... and to many blown engine threads (when I finally attached to the server, that is)
I can say that I do NOT plan to renew my membership when my current 2-yr term expires. I think I still have 1.5 years left on this term but if things don't get SIGNIFICANTLY better then I don't see the utility of supporting the site monetarily.
I loved it on the 996 and on the older models as well. Not sure it really seems to be a good fit with the 997 MK2. It might grow on me, but it just looks "a bit much" for some reason on this car whereas it looked completely natural on all previous models.
No, I am not going to change my user ID!!!!! Why should I????... you didn't when you moved to NC.
BTW, nice car you recently got.
I don't know much about them but I'll bet it is awesome on the track. DO you miss teh GT3 much?
I actually started a thread and asked for opinions on changing LVDell to NCDell but the choice was made clear by my constituents to keep LVDell.
Maybe start a poll? Ah hell, I'll get it going.
Thanks, I have my first test with it this weekend. Full report to follow.
Does a bear **** in the woods?
The consensus over on the 997 forum is that we don't care for it. Some are even talking about putting the 2wd deck lids on their 4s. It will clearly date the 997 Carrera 4 cars from 2006 through 2008.
It's all purely cosmetic, and the rear sag in the tail lights just doesn't work for me. Sadly, it's a sign of Zuffenhausen learning a few things from Detroit--like how to date a car quickly from year to year. One would think getting the DI engine would be good enough!
the new reflector is to thin... if you gonna put one in... PUT ONE IN! it just doesnt work with the tear drop brake lights....looks like an after thought and half assed it....
I'm not a fan of the lights or the reflector or of Tim changing his handle (Is that even possible anymore?), but I do have a mac and I could see the image fine (in Safari)
since I wrote this now it seems it's totally random what I can and can't see whether safari or firefox (and I even tried it in internet explorer on VMware)
Sometimes it's an avatar, sometimes it's attachments, sometimes instead of pics I get a list of attachments, which then sometimes work an sometimes just pop up a blank window. And I am on HIGH speed internet 50+MB/S
Where do we paying rennlist members send our constructive criticism now? (a similar going to the dogs period occurred when a buddy of mine sold his forum to IB last year)
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
