17 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHC4S Suspension Differences
Leading reported evidence
Replace stock suspension
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
On my last 993 C2, I swapped the stock suspension for the ROW M030 and noticed a tremendous improvement.
Leading evidence: 'Replace stock suspension' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Recommend full factory (x73) replacement if you intend' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Recommend full factory (x73) replacement if you intend
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I would highly recommend the full factory (x73) replacement if you intend to race.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
You can just change the springs, but the cost of the labor is nearly the same for just springs, or springs and buffers (and it's the labor cost that dominates this modification).
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I LOVE the lower nose, but it set me back about $2K for 20mm.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
You can just change the springs, but the cost of the labor is nearly the same for just springs, or springs and buffers (and it's the labor cost that dominates this modification).
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
17 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T052503Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I'm having trouble with SEARCH function at present or I would start there...
Going to look at a 02 C4S today with 66k miles. Can someone tell me if the suspension is different on 4S versus regular C2? The photos make it look like it sits lower. Were the 02's lower by design than 99-01's?
Thanks.
Keith
So is the C4S/Turbo suspension not stiffer/lower than the C2? Hoping to avoid having to do a suspension upgrade out of the gate.
On my last 993 C2, I swapped the stock suspension for the ROW M030 and noticed a tremendous improvement.
The C4S is the same car as a turbo, except w/out the turbo engine. So it is the suspension is the same. The factory literature describes the Turbo and C4S suspension as 10mm lower than a regular Carrera.
The difference in a Turbo suspension from a C4S suspension is the "S" (sport) modification gets special Bilstein shocks and different spring rates only for the C4S.
10 mm lower then a C2, but it still doesn't look low enough.
I didn't replace the shocks, just swapped out the springs for H&R lowering springs and it looks much better but feels the same.
Here is before
Here is after
I agree; it's not low enough. I splurged for the european C4S struts and springs in front and kept the US/ROW Sport shocks and springs in back to angle the nose down (20mm). I LOVE the lower nose, but it set me back about $2K for 20mm. Many would consider this foolish, but I "absolutely" had to have it.
I realize that I'm probably different than most, but I think the lowered car looks too "squashed" onto the tires. My eyes immediately tell me that something is "wrong" with how the wheel arch relates to the shape of the tire.
You might check out the X73 European Porsche suspension. It consists of new shocks/springs and engine mounts and lowers the car further and totally transforms the handling. Just bolt in pieces and an alignment and you're good to go.
For C2/C4: OEM RoW M030 sport suspension lows -20 mm front and -10 mm rear
Stiffer shocks, springs and sway bars with incresase diameter.
C4S/TT have M030 installed
This kit is a bit more stiffer (aprox 15%) than standard one.
The different for you american guys is that US M030 suspension is a bit taller than RoW M030, so if you get this kit installed, always go with RoW
Porsche engineers designed this kit to have best compromise (not too much stiffer, but excellent handling, steering response and cornering). For me it's rather good. I'm not very friendly to change what engineers did.
OEM X74 lows -40 mm front and -30 mm rear (for C2/C4 models)
OEM X73 lows -20 mm front and -10 mm rear (for C4S/TT models)
This kits are similar to 996 GT3 suspension. Very very good even as daily use in good roads with fine asfalt. Too much risk to touch down in garage ramps.
What do you think about the compromise with H&R springs ?
Can you tell us if you notice some improvement with this lower springs, or is it only a aesthetical staff? If they works good, perhaps I'll mount them...
I'm considering to install RoW M030 kit in my car, but standard suspension is only 17.000 km., What springs reference have I to look for in H&R springs to have a good compromise?
Thanks in advance
There is no compromise, the H&R spring are only for looks. They don't do anything for improving handling.
The OEM shocks are quite good, even for the track. I am not a race car driver so going with the X74 setup is not worth it to me because the 4S are ready handles nicely for my ability and the 12-15 track days I do every season.
Plus $400 compared to $4000 ???
I've heard choosing shocks and springs is best done in combination. But if the C4S has the basic US M030 suspension but at US ride heights, would it work to just purchase the ROW m030 springs.
Would this be a balanced setup if I'm not looking for major handling differences but simply a slightly lowered stance?
Thanks.
Keith
Keith:
The buffers are matched to the springs. You can just change the springs, but the cost of the labor is nearly the same for just springs, or springs and buffers (and it's the labor cost that dominates this modification). I would highly recommend the full factory (x73) replacement if you intend to race. But if you just want to clean up the lines, swapping just the front springs will look nice (20mm lower). The rear springs are only 10mm lower, with a +/- 10 mm tolerance, so you might want to modify only the front.
Ric :-)
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.