35 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHI now feel worthy enough to post pics of my car.
Leading reported evidence
Replace few things
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Replace few things' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace date clear side light' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I only change I would suggest is to replace the date clear side light with the more stylish amber lights.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I only change I would suggest is to replace the date clear side light with the more stylish amber lights.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
2 your rear tires are stretched and i'm betting you also run cheap tires
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
35 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T201111Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I recently changed a few things on the car. It has now given me more confidence to post it with the other brilliant examples of 996s on this board. Having only owned a P-car for three months I can already see why you put so much emotion and love into these cars. I love this car!! Enjoy.
Great looking ride - I don't mean to sound snooty, but that thing must be viewed like a UFO to some of the locals huh? I bet it attracts a lot of attention at the coffee house or valet. Great color too.
Very true, I do live in rural Missouri.
I get quite a few looks and on a couple of occasions I have had people follow me in traffic, slowing down and speeding up to keep next to me. Its kinda weird and cool all at the same time.
Nice....may I suggest suspension as your next mod? Looks great, love the color, and I like the wheels....The whole thing would come together perfectly if the car was lower, in my opinion...
it seems to me that a lot of these guys have their panties in a bunch when i'm making a factual statement that your wheel setup could be much better esp given that your car body itself looks so good with the oem aerokit.
1 they're les schwab wheels that are cheap and imo not very good looking
2 your rear tires are stretched and i'm betting you also run cheap tires
3 they look like they're 17s? are they 18s?
i concur with newport's advice that you should seriously consider lowering your car too to avoid the 4x4 look.
handle the truth or be ignorant and accept mediocrity. next.
You do understand that this is illogical, right? The statement is not factual at all. It's subjective. As is the definition of 'better'. Geez, Ben, you're losing your sang froid, here, which makes you look more trollish...
Nice looking car...now slam it
Oh before I forget...work it out with your local law enforcement that it is OK not to have a front license plate, it looks like your car has a booger on the front IMHO
