fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

1999 996 C2 vs 2000 996 C2 for track use

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
22 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH1999 996 C2 vs 2000 996 C2 for track use

Leading reported evidence

Replace their motors so don't shy away

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Many cars have replaced their motors so don't shy away from those cars.

1999 996 C2 vs 2000 996 C2 for track use
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace their motors so don't shy away' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace their motors so don't shy away' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 22 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 3 other evidence results

Run almost 2 seconds quicker

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If I recall correctly, I ran almost 2 seconds quicker on a longish course with my TC off (I had a 99 with LSD and TC).

1999 996 C2 vs 2000 996 C2 for track use

Use only

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I have found PSM to very rarely come on during track use, only on bumps but it's nice to know it's there if you screw the pooch.

1999 996 C2 vs 2000 996 C2 for track use

Use since these cars are cheaper now

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I'm looking for one mainly for drivers ed use - since these cars are cheaper now.

1999 996 C2 vs 2000 996 C2 for track use
Frequently discussed actions (4)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace their motors so don't shy away

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Many cars have replaced their motors so don't shy away from those cars.

1999 996 C2 vs 2000 996 C2 for track use

Run almost 2 seconds quicker

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If I recall correctly, I ran almost 2 seconds quicker on a longish course with my TC off (I had a 99 with LSD and TC).

1999 996 C2 vs 2000 996 C2 for track use

Use only

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I have found PSM to very rarely come on during track use, only on bumps but it's nice to know it's there if you screw the pooch.

1999 996 C2 vs 2000 996 C2 for track use

Use since these cars are cheaper now

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I'm looking for one mainly for drivers ed use - since these cars are cheaper now.

1999 996 C2 vs 2000 996 C2 for track use
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

22 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T150451Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I'm looking for one mainly for drivers ed use - since these cars are cheaper now. Confused about what options are better for track use? Did all 99's come with LSD standard? Was traction control an option - did it include LSD? Can the traction control be completely turned off. What are main differences between MY99 and MY00? When did E-gas come on the 996? Was sunroof optional back then? Did any post MY99 cars come with TC/LSD? When did PSM first become standard on the 996? thanks

POST 2Original post

Quotes source post: 4568433

I'll take a first whack at it. Other will fill in the holes. Sunroofs could be deleted but it's very rare. LSD is was not standard but was available. If you find one it is likely shot anyway. Non-egas is better than egas. Egas is on the 99 C4 and all cars 2000+. No need for TC. You don't have enough power to worry too much about spinning the huge rear tires.

POST 3Original post

PSM was an option and can be turned off. However, it's never really off, a lot like PMS.

POST 4Original post

Okay, I know the 99 was the year that LSD was an option for the 911... not available on the 2000. Now I have a 99 with the LSD, but the comment above that most are shot seems odd... how is that determined? What are the indications that it might be shot? I have also heard the non e-gas is preffered for throttle response and that the 99 is also somewhat lighter. Of course my opinion is biased as I have a 99! P.S. My car also has the Traction Control, I believe this can be totally disabled with the dashboard switch unlike PSM. Is that correct? David

POST 5Original post

I purchased a 01 (high milage) for track use this year after 4 events I could not be happier w/ the decision. I went w the 01 because PSM was standard. I have found PSM to very rarely come on during track use, only on bumps but it's nice to know it's there if you screw the pooch.

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

My understanding was like Reborn996. Was traction control available with and without LSD? I also think TC can be completely disabled while PSM can be turned off but will come back on under heavy braking. If I find a car without TC and no LSD - Can I install LSD? Is the throttle response better without e-gas?

POST 7Original post

What is the purpose of turning off TC or PSM ? My experience w/ PSM is that it is very non intrusive, in addition to feeling when it acctivates it also lights up on the dash you know when it comes on. You have to realy have the back end hanging out to get it to engage. I had my car out in the rain on Summit Point yesterday and it did not come on even during controled slides. So if it is not comming on it is not slowing you down. If you are not building a drift car why would you want to turn it off ?

POST 8Original post

Quotes source post: 4569971

Your PSM must be tuned quite differently than my MY99 C4's PSM, which comes on quickly and regularly during semi-moderate cornering.

POST 9Original post

Quotes source post: 4570093

+1. Same as my 99C4.

POST 10Original post

Quotes source post: 4569684

My '01 does not have PSM.

POST 11Original post

Quotes source post: 4570093

The PSM on my 01 and my 04 rarely comes on - I only really got it going in a parking lot with about 2" of snow - justing seeing how far I could push the cars before PSM came on.

POST 12Original post

Quotes source post: 4569971

I can't say on the track but on an autocross, disabling your PSM is very desirable as it actually allows the car to rotate when decelerating. If I recall correctly, I ran almost 2 seconds quicker on a longish course with my TC off (I had a 99 with LSD and TC). I drove a buddies 02 and the car was fast and capable but when you over cooked the front end, the rear would not rotate even with the PSM off as if you touched the brakes in a slide the PSM would activate and try to "Fix" what you where doing. The only way I found around this is to lift on initial turn in and add a bit more steering input to try to get the car to rotate. It works but is no where near as fun as being able to lift mid corner to correct if you need to. I drove the car with PSM on and it was really boring as the car would under steer more than with it off. I also was quite a bit faster with it off than on. I suspect that PSM on track is very useful but on an autocross, it's not nearly as fun or as fast with it on. Hope this helps, Pete

POST 13Original post

Riz, You can add an aftermarket LSD. It will be much better than the stock unit. Both because it will be more durable and because you can have it tuned to your needs. I wouldn�t make an LSD my first mod. These cars come off corners pretty well without it. Throttle response is faster and more predictable without egas. You don�t have a computer interpreting what you mean by mashing the peddle. Frankly I don�t think traction control is needed at the track. It might actually get in the way. I think PSM is fine for a beginner/intermediate but will really get in the way as your track driving advances. The fast way through many corners in a 996 is to turn in early and fast and rotate the car under trail braking before the apex. Then back on the gas before or at the apex. Think of it as the fast in, fast out method. You don�t want PSM second guessing your intentions. If you are a nice smooth, slow in, fast out driver PSM is a great safety net. BTW, you can drive very fast without engaging PSM. Or you can drive very slow and have it blinking like pinball machine. As always, just my 2 cents. I could be wrong. Jim

POST 14Original post

Just a quick note - it's not that expensive to drop a LSD in the tranny. I still say buy as new as you can afford and mod the heck out of her. C.

POST 15Original post

I can defintly see the logic in turning off PSM for autocross . as for JimB's comments I would will have to claim a problem of LOFT (Lack of #*@^ing talent ) on my part.

POST 16 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Can LSD be added to PSM car? - I thought they were incompatable. I'm little confused as to which years the 996 had LSD, TC or both. Just to make sure - TC is compatable with LSD, and TC can be totally switched off right? Thanks everybody.

POST 17 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Also what problems to watch out for and identify on 99 996 C2 - engine/drivetrain related? When did they switch over to E-gas? Are all 99's throttle cable? Any non-sunroof cars our there? I have begun searching for car.

POST 18Original post

The 99's that have traction have LSD (was an option) and so do the 40th anniversary cars do too. Look for the 220 option code as that is the LSD code (in the 99). All of the C2's have cable throttle (for 99). Also, the TC can be completely deactivated. In terms of engine problems, the 99's where more problematic than later models with RMS, cylinder sleeve issues and intermix problems. Many cars have replaced their motors so don't shy away from those cars. There can even be an argument that replacement motor cars are a bit more desirable considering they have all of the latest engine updates (depending on what year the engine was put in). IIRC- 2001 was the switch over to E-gas in the C2. I remember something about the c4's all having E-gas but I'll let someone else chime in as I'm not sure on that. Hope this helps, Pete

POST 19Original post

ALL 996's, with the exception of the 99 C2, have egas.

POST 20Original post

Called suncoast Porsche this morning about MAF part numbers. 99C4 MAF have the same part number as my egas part number. There are two MAF part numbers one for egas and the other.

POST 22Original post

Quotes source post: 4572847

Has anyone here added LSD to a PSM car? Is there anything to consider regarding the PSM?

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.