17 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHIs it me?
Leading reported evidence
Use recently....enjoy
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Use recently....enjoy' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use recently....enjoy' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
17 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T191851Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Are these 996's just getting down right cheap? I looked at a couple MY 02's in the middle to upper 30k range with pretty low miles and in very nice condition. Having only owned air cooled 911's in the past its hard to not to consider these 996's as real good Porsche values. The MY 99-01's are already down right cheap.
you watch, one day, a new generation of yuppies will buy them all up, sell them and charge more than sticker... what other 911's have these headlights... you just watch
You can find 99's in the 20's all over I have looked at a couple of MY02's in the middle 30's and I have seen some MY03's in the upper 30's close to 40
It's not you it's me. As soon as I make a financial decision (in this case buying a car) the inevitable result is that following circumstances make the timing of my decision as poor as possible. I bought in April of this year. I am considering charging a fee to inform individuals of my financial decisions, so others can do the opposite and make a killing.
I have looked at a handful and I think I may wait a few more months till the winter to look for a good scoop. They still have some decay left in them IMHO.
I bought my '00 with 17k miles 6 months ago, and paid $39k. True, I paid more just because the car was mint, low miles, and close to home, in the color and with the options I wanted. If the car is worth $9k less, so be it. I'm not selling! As long as nothing blows up or catches fire, I plan on enjoying the car for years to come.
So, it is a great time to buy, and a great time to own. It's just not a seller's market.
Paid $35K for an '02 back in April. That was agreat price then, it's pretty normal now. Ben's right - there's word for it.
That said, the rate of "depreciation" (as ben calls) is remarkably steep.
