18 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHdo these oily bits look ok??
Leading reported evidence
Check with you knowledgeable folk
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
there were no leaks apparent - but i'd like to just check with you knowledgeable folk on here that this is 'normal'
Leading evidence: 'Check with you knowledgeable folk' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check with you knowledgeable folk' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
makes a change from the silvers/greys that are two a penny over here these days....
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
18 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T020439Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi there - Tim from The UK here
- I have just put an offer in on a '02 Targa - subject to PPI - so I'll hopefully be joining the 996 club next week.
on getting home from viewing the car this morning - i noticed that the camera flash had brought up some 'oil staining' on the underside of the engine.
there were no leaks apparent - but i'd like to just check with you knowledgeable folk on here that this is 'normal'
coming from a 964, this caused me undue stress, and has slightly muted my excitement over my impending purchase..
I'm sure the PPI at the local OPC will weedle out any issues, but as i'm sure you can appreciate - the idea of waiting until tuesday/wednesday is not very appealing!
here are some pics (bear in mind is a UK car so salty winter roads etc.)
any thoughts?
Thanks,
A bit of a tough one Tim. It looks like oil from careless oil changes. You need to lift it and check if it is coming from a seal or something higher up on the engine. Wait for the PPI.
P.S Just speaking for the knowledgable folk, whoever they are.
thanks dresler - will keep fingers crossed -
the engine has 29k miles on in - so i would
hope
that leakyness would not rear its head for another 30-40k or so at least -
or am i reading out of the wrong books?
cheers
Tim
That stuff on the bottom looks more like cooked on cosmoline. Is the stuff soft or hard? does it come off on your finger? If not it is just cosmoline and not a worry.
hey man...you're picture is backwards...need to flip it around the right way
I can't comment on the oil issue, as I don't really know. But I've got my fingers crossed for ya!!
thanks for the kind words guys - OE - yours was the only other 'underside' pic i could find in the search - i tip may hat to your detailing skills!
the black stuff kinda flakes off, but some bits are well adhered to the casing...
can anyone confirm that theirs looks similar?
Booking the PPI this morning!
THanks in advance,
Tim
Best of luck Timbo!
Be warned, US Tim will be wanting pictures of the new ride posted asap if the PPI leads to you handing over the dosh for your new motor!
Just giving you a heads up.
US Tim can be brutal if you're a slacker with the snaps!!
Cheers OE!
PPI tomorrow afternoon -if all is good, will pick up at the end of this week!
hopefully it will have been worth the 8 hr round trip to view the car yesterday!
In the UK thats a
long
drive! - especially in a VW Polo.....
hating to tempt fate - get the ppi results tomorrow - here is a pic of the car.
i soooooo hope it passes the PPI!!!
(and i LOVE the colour - looks so much better in the metal... )
I'm not sure thats what they called it off the production line
makes a change from the silvers/greys that are two a penny over here these days....
....Timmer
(not yet bought and already dreading the resale....)
I'm SoCal born and I have never seen anything that looked like that. Even my 1970 M/B 280 Cab doesn't have corrosion like that and it is 37 years old. Seriously, is that really what happens to cars in wet climates?
My buddy had a 360 in that colour
Looked great because it was different - was difficult to sell for the same reason
Mind you - he had grass green carpets inside with cream leather!
Very nice looking, Tim. That looks like Forest Green. When you get the car, check under the trunk lid (bonnet as you would call it) for the Options Sticker and you will find the paint color code (or colour code, if you prefer).
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.