42 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHShould I buy a NSX or a Porsche
Leading reported evidence
Run 1:20 laps at willow springs
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I know it sounds sacrilege to say that a Porsche 911 is the fastest way to go on a site called The NSX-Files, but let's face it, there are some Porsche drivers that can run 1:20 laps at Willow Springs.
Leading evidence: 'Run 1:20 laps at willow springs' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run 1:20 laps at willow springs' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Run 1:20 laps at willow springs
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I know it sounds sacrilege to say that a Porsche 911 is the fastest way to go on a site called The NSX-Files, but let's face it, there are some Porsche drivers that can run 1:20 laps at Willow Springs.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
42 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T165820Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I can't make up my mind because the NSX is way COOL and is super fast and nothing can touch it class wise. I'm searching for a nsx for less than $25k and can't find a clean one. The 1992 technology is way better than any 993 and as good as a 996 if not better. My other choice is a M3 because my brother has has one and he is smarter than I am. Please help me decide if I should buy porsche or the more superior nsx. Cheers.
Sort of sounds like you already made up your mind....
I considered the same sort of thing, but the NSX will always be a Honda. Even if it is a cool Honda
My brother has an NSX and I prefer my porsche 10 times over. I had work done and borrowed his Acura for a week and was like "WHERE IS MY CAR?". It has a cool spaceship on the road factor that is undeniable.
good luck on the $25k.
I sold my 1995 NSX-T for almost $40k just two years ago.
In the five years i owned it is depreciated by $2k per year (bought for $50k)
early ones have the snap ring issues... but i guess you know that if you are looking already
Was this thread started on April 1?
"Should I buy a Honda CRX or a Porsche? I figure they're the same because they're both small and have that sloping back window. Should I really pay more for a Porsche? I mean who cares if the spoiler moves, the CRX has a perfectly good solid one at the back. My High School teacher who is the smartest person I know drives a CRX so it must be the best car. Plus Heidi next door's uncle used to drive one and he was WAY COOL. I mean a Porsche isn't really any faster is it?"
M3killa - that was funny - thought it was serious post until the "brotheris smarter than me . ."
Anyway, FWIW, I'm actually considering a '91 NSX w/ 30 K for $32K, one owner, full service records BUT it will be in addition to not in place of the '99 C2. I think they both are great cars in different categories and both have virtues.
The only thing that has held me back is that the NSX is red and I like to stay just a liitle more subdued - silver or black would have sealed the deal.
Guys.. theres no substitute.. Ive been from Porsche to Lotus to Ferrari and GLAD to be back to Porsche...
one day youll figure it out.
NSX?.. we dont need no stinkin NSX!
M3killa, what are you going to use the car for?
Daily driver or track car? The NSX is not a good daily driver, the 996 is. On the track they are very different. You can make an NSX into an insanely good track car, doing 1.34 around Laguna Seca with a good driver and some turbos, beating GT3s easily, but ... is it a track car you want?
I sort of figured you would not like that one.
The NSX I'm talking about has >490bhp and goes like a rocket :-)
http://www.jcmotophoto.com/gallery/2...125563580-M-LB
Only chain jerkers and nappy-headed hos would dare compare a Honda to a Porsche, though I must say I enjoyed driving my Prelude and don�t call me nappy-headed.
25k, your best bid is a beat up sti or evo
nsx is a good car and properly SC'd like kip's car can be extremely fast, but i dont think they are faster than GT3 (given equal drivers of course). and a properly dialed in nsx loaded with JDM and/or comptech parts is well over 100k easily.
When I was in the 8th grade my hair was long, thick and wavy and my PE teacher who didn�t know my name yet call out in my direction � You, You with the haystack�� and it stuck with me all through high school.
He should be fired (or shot) for public humiliation. What is statue of limitation on civil rights violations?
Yeah I sort of didn't read very carefully did I
mooty, I beg to differ about the GT3/NSX(kip's car) comparison.
It has more hp, less weight, lower center of gravity and "better" weight distribution than a GT3.
It makes the vipers look slow on the straights
It's not valid for all NSXs in general and I bet you can again modify a GT3 to beat it but a standard GT3 would not beat Kip's car.
Look at these times from Laguna Seca:
http://www.speedventures.com/event_r...esults=OA&s=lt
and compare it to the Radicals in this one:
http://www.speedventures.com/event_r...esults=OA&s=lt
But if you go to
www.nsxfiles.com
and read his stories and watch his videos you will see his NSX - supercharged or not - getting lapped time and time again by Porsches. In one video he actually comments on the Porsches and how much faster they are. He also says this when comparing his supercharged NSX to his Ferrari F355:
Note: if you want to go REALLY fast at the track, and you want the chance to win at any race.......then buy a used Porsche 911/993 and strip it down and put go-fast parts on it. It will probably cost less than an F355 or a Supercharged NSX, you got a zillion different aftermarket parts and vendors to choose from, and you can hop up the Porsches up to 600+ hp. And then it is game over for the Supercharged NSX or F355, but your Porsche will still remind me of a fat, bloated, overweight Kermit the Frog. I know it sounds sacrilege to say that a Porsche 911 is the fastest way to go on a site called The NSX-Files, but let's face it, there are some Porsche drivers that can run 1:20 laps at Willow Springs. Ain't no way possible you can build an NSX that will do 1:20 laptimes for an extended period of time without blowing up. (Yeah, you might be able to do a 1:20 laptime in a souped up Viper GTS, but do you really want to drive a race car that was built in Detroit?). If want to build a car to run at the 24 Hours of Daytona, it seems that if you do the research, Porsche seems to be the way to go, you will be fast and competitive and fairly reliable.....but you will look ugly...
who cares about outright laptimes. it's as if some of you guys make a living out of laptimes when the reality is FAR from it.
each car has its pluses and minuses.
the nsx is a legend in its own right and the newer ones nicely modified with wheels, suspension, and aerokit will break necks. it's reliable, handles superbly and looks very exotic and is super rare. ya can't beat that combination.
drive both and get a feeler and you'll make the right decision.
best of luck,
ben
p.s. go buy a new vw cabrio - it's hot
My 2 cents...
M3- I had one for anout a year. Great dialy driver, awsome handling, good trunk space, and I loved the SMG, especially if you are going to drive as a daily driver. Against the 996 amd NSX, the M3 has a slight edge on the quarter mile. You can find one for about 25K, but it will be a 01 with high miles.
NSX- I have always thought of getting one, but i would not like the attention of driving it on a daily basis. The early ones has about 270 HP, which is out dated compared to todays cars. Defintaly a ledgend in its time, but out dated. Plus I cant stand the Honda interior. You will have to spend north of $30K for a decent example.
996- Great Car and superb performace. Smaller than the M3 but bigger than the NSX. This is the car im looking to get into as I just got out of the M3. A porsche is a porsche, No Sub. Just like the NSX, you will need to spend north of 30K to get a low milage example.
we are actually in agreement. my post was poorly written though.
i meant to say a stock GT3 is faster than stock NSC.
but kips car is not your usual NSX, it will eat just about any GT3 out there unless you pour some very SERIOUS money on the GT3.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.