36 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHPre-drive inspection
Leading reported evidence
Check "hot" tire pressure (compare current readings
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
o - Check "hot" tire pressure (compare current readings to previous nights hot pressure readings to be certain they are in the acceptable, approved or "recommended" limits).
Leading evidence: 'Check "hot" tire pressure (compare current readings' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check "hot" tire pressure (compare current readings' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Check air intake slots and are between hood and windshield
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
- Check air intake slots and are between hood and windshield
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
- Check all doors and hoods for proper operation and latch them properly
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Check "hot" tire pressure (compare current readings
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
o - Check "hot" tire pressure (compare current readings to previous nights hot pressure readings to be certain they are in the acceptable, approved or "recommended" limits).
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
36 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 1 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T073501Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I seldom ask for help on this forum, but I am hoping to get some expert opinion on something that has troubled me for years:
I have a 99 C2, and when I first got the car, I read the manual, cover to cover, determined to follow Porsche�s recommendations and suggestions; since they must know the best way of caring for and driving their magnificent machines.
Therefore, for the past 9 years, I have religiously followed the manuals instructions to:
Before diving off�..
Check the following items first
- Be sure the tires are inflated correctly. Check tires for damage and tire wear
- See that wheel bolts are properly tightened and not loose or missing
- Check engine oil level, add if necessary
- Check all fluid levels
- Be sure vehicle battery is well charged
- Check all doors and hoods for proper operation and latch them properly
- Check and replace if necessary wiper blades
- See that all windows are clear and unobstructed
- Check air intake slots and are between hood and windshield
- Check all interior and exterior lights and make sure lenses are clean
- Check headlights for proper aim and adjust if necessary
- Check under the vehicle for leaks
All the above is suggested before you even get in the car.
My concern is that it takes me approximately 30 minutes to perform all the above tasks each time I want to drive my car. It used to be more than an hour, but through careful planning and efficiencies I implemented with my inspection technique, I was able to cut the time in half.
My question to the experts is whether they also follow Porsche�s suggestions before driving their car. I also ask whether you think it would be wise for me to use some of my intelligence to, maybe, modify what I insect each time I want to take the car for a drive. Recently, I almost stopped the above inspections if I had already done one that same day. However, when I did my inspection in the morning and drove to get coffee at Duncan Donuts, I just was not comfortable NOT doing the inspection all over again before driving back home.
I have read and reread the manual and, nowhere is there any guidance that this inspection should be done daily, weekly or less frequently, so I feel compelled, in order to be as safe as possible and properly maintain the vehicle, to perform the inspection before each and every drive.
Forgive me for the question, but I DID search the forum several times but found nothing that would provide me with any guidance. I saw many posting that suggested that it is always best to follow Porsche' recommendations and that no one on the board should question their expertise.
I am hoping that there may be a maverick among us that has strayed from some Porsche recommendations and would like to know how they were able to sleep at night. Also, what special qualifications do you have to make such a decision against Porsche recommendations?.
Thank to all.
Are you serious? I would love to get a video of this provess if this is true. I manually check my tires and oil once each week, visually inspect the tires each time I drive, let her idle for a few seconds, drive off and keep the car below 4k RPM until my temp hits 180. Then it's vroom vroom.
Dude, either you have the world's
driest
sense of humor
, or a serious dose of OCD.
In case it's the latter, I assure you that for normal driving, I get in, buckle up, start the engine, and go.
So far so good.
I forgot to mention the problem with checking the lug bolts torque before each drive. I typically set the initial bolt torgue to about 96/ftlbs. Unfortunately, the only way to properly check the setting is to apply enough torque to the bolt to get it to move just slightly more than it was set for. This means that everytime I check the lugs, I have to increase the torque by about 1/ftlb to get a proper reading. So now I have to loosen all the bolts every few drives and reset them so I don't over torque them.
There has to be a better way!
Because the manual states that the oil pressure should be at 3.5 bar on a warmed engine at running speed and mine is always at 5 bar, I've made it a practice to add 2 quarts of kerosene to the cranckcase in order to lower the pressure. Guage is now accurate according to the manual. I use to put 3 quarts less ol in the crankcase to lower the pressure but I heard alot of noise in the back of the car.
Have a great weekend everyone.
Seriously 1999Porsche911 is right. I do all the checks myself - every time! Even if I only get the mail. Plus: as I have a K&N CAI that I'm not supposed to use in the rain, I own a small Porsche umbrella to walk home if it rains.
The only thing funnier than the original post is the fact that some people don't actually get the humor.
I have one minor criticism though - please note that every time you check the air pressure in your tires, you are letting a little bit of air escape. I hope that you remember to "top off" the tire after checking.
Michael
Wow!! You are really wound pretty tight about the oil/porsche approved thing huh?
Okay, I'm convinced!!
From now on I will know if anyone ever experiences;
- Variocam surge
- Valve clatter
- Smoke on start-up
- No smoke on start up
- an RMS failure
- too much oil pressure
- not enough oil pressure
- oil starvation
- an engine failure
- a tire failure
- a cupholder failure
- or hit a deer
It was probably due to poor oil selection.
I will now run out to the garage and drain all of the offending 0W-40 from my engines (it should be a quick process since I now understand that its consistency is that of "water" so it will just gush out).
FWIW, I'm going to go with Russ Murphy's recommendation. He uses the unadulterated tear duct oil of virgin Emperor penquins. According to Russ, once it's fractally distilled it is able to adhere infinitely to engine bearing components even up to 15,000 degrees Kelvin. It's ridiculously expensive and not on Porsche's recommended/approved/accustomed/acknowledged/allowed/authorized/chosen/confirmed/credited/endorsed/established/kosher/okayed/preferred/recognized/sanctioned list, but what the heck that list was published by the marketing department anyway.
Thanks again for the advice.
Tim & Dell, fire up the popcorn machine and get me a stiff drink. It's Friday after all!!
Thanks, I guess. I think it's time for the 2 of us to grab a drink
Maybe then we can understand eachother better. Maybe it's the brit in my that people don't get sometimes
Yeah, throw me in there. I wondered how someone with so many posts could be so uptight, yet I still allowed myself to believe he could be telling the truth.
Dry jokesters: 1, Carpundit: 0.
Although a bit too sweet for my taste, still a nice choice. Personally, like mine dirty, very dirty
with 3 olives
London to be exact. However, I was born here in the states. First generation to be born here though so I don't have to carry around that silly little green card like my Dad did
1999Porsche911 take my post in the humorous good spirit I intended it.
FWIW, I hear you (and don't disagree) that Porsche sometimes must make compromises with the set-up and recommendations for it's cars.
i.e. ride vs handling, power vs emissions, weight vs durability, recommended tire pressures more suited to the street than track, pads that won't hold up to track use, etc.
However, sometimes I think it just makes good sense to follow their advice. For example, I see no reason not to use their specs for wheel bolt torque.
and..........when it comes to the oil, I am sticking to one of the oils on their list.
Have a great weekend (in spite of our current weather)!
You can tell you were not born in the UK...........
You walked straight past the 'Which Brit did you have in you?' joke, without the obvious, 'No-one that you'd know' answer!
That's pure Two Ronnies or Pete & Dud - very British humour.
Of course, I just lost 99.9% of the people on this forum - but that's nothing new!
Cheers!!
1999Porsche911 - I actually believed you did all those checks and I was thinking, man, I took that guys advise on another forum (you were dead on, THANKS). I thought to myself after reading, I will never takes this guys advise ever again; that was a good one and I cant believe I fell for it, good work.
Just having a little Friday afternoon fun
[/QUOTE]
How many posts must you have before you can make a joke? I read a joke from some one with just 57 posts so I have to make at least another 44 �engine failure� post before I can post a joke!
Probably never. I thought about it some time ago and actually posted a thread (poll) asking for input n if I should change to NC from LV.
https://rennlist.com/forums/996-forum/278364-opinions-on-new-user-name.html
I know I am late to this party, but just go home from work a few minutes ago, then I had to spend 45 minutes conducting my POST-drive inspection:
o - Torque lug nuts (don't want them to fall off overnight).
o - Check "hot" tire pressure (compare current readings to previous nights hot pressure readings to be certain they are in the acceptable, approved or "recommended" limits).
o - Topped off windshield wiper fluid (even if sprayer wasn't used, charting evaporation rate against current external temperature and humidity readings to calculate evaporation rate).
o - Measured paint thickness on hood and front fenders (in 20 months have documented 0.000000013 microns of clear coat loss on front 1/3 of hood and fenders compared to the other areas of the hood and fenders. Theorize that air friction is the cause. Another 214 months of daily data should give me enough information to support or disprove that theory).
In the morning, I will just get in and drive!
PS - here's the popcorn!
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.