fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

New Porsche alternative???

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
19 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHNew Porsche alternative???

Leading reported evidence

Clean /exotic

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I've been eyeing them for a while now, they look clean/exotic and with a manageable price tag too.

New Porsche alternative???
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Clean /exotic' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean /exotic' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 19 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 2 other evidence results

Test emission

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

also don't forget that being a kit car, means it doesn't have to pass federal crash test, emission test, and bunch of other regulations.

New Porsche alternative???

Use 455-hp, three-liter, twin-turbo engine and can accelerate

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

"The vehicle uses a 455-hp, three-liter, twin-turbo engine and can accelerate from zero to 60 mph in under 3.5 seconds.

New Porsche alternative???
Frequently discussed actions (3)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Clean /exotic

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I've been eyeing them for a while now, they look clean/exotic and with a manageable price tag too.

New Porsche alternative???

Test emission

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

also don't forget that being a kit car, means it doesn't have to pass federal crash test, emission test, and bunch of other regulations.

New Porsche alternative???

Use 455-hp, three-liter, twin-turbo engine and can accelerate

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

"The vehicle uses a 455-hp, three-liter, twin-turbo engine and can accelerate from zero to 60 mph in under 3.5 seconds.

New Porsche alternative???
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

19 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Outcome without a verified action link

Look at Lotus, they make tens of thousands, they are great cars, but quality is still not there even with Elise (other than the Toyota engine), even though it is one of the best track car there is.

No unique explicit quoted action; no causal link assigned

Generation: 20261026T200546Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

what do you guys think of this http://www.noblecars.com/m15/index.html just saw it in the latest top gear eposide andi have to say very impressive.

POST 2Original post

Never seen one in person but its precurser, the M12, is one of my favorite cars in Project Gotham Racing III. (and I also LOVE the M14 in PGR3) Yeah, it's definitely a looker - and apparently US legal. And the specs on it are unreal. "The vehicle uses a 455-hp, three-liter, twin-turbo engine and can accelerate from zero to 60 mph in under 3.5 seconds. Its top speed approaches 200 mph." Nice.

POST 3Original post

I just watched TopGear testing this car,I think it kinda looks like a Ferrari (360,430)from the front..how much do you guys think it'll cost here?

POST 4Original post

Nice cars. Fast. Reliable? I saw one at a Laguna Seca DE and it was running, but not at it's promised specification. The owner said that the engine was not developing enough boost and had to be looked at. The bottom line is that they are kit cars and there will be teething problems.

POST 5Original post

They are sweet and I want one. I think they are good for the hardcore enthusiast. The wife/girlfriend will have a tough time with it, if you have to choose just one. I am speaking about the earlier models. The M15 is great, but I don't t beleive that model is coming to the USA.

POST 6Original post

It's a kit car...and it shows. On top of that, it's British. Enough said.

POST 8Original post

Where does it say that it's a kit car? As for being British let me point out that Aston Martin, Lotus, Bentley, Rolls Royce, etc... British. Just in case you had forgotten. I'm not sure that many of us would turn down a gift of one of those cars.

POST 9Original post

Yves, you sound like a decent guy, so why are you making statements like an idiot! 1) The Nobel is NOT a kit car - the US importer buys the chassis, and then teams them to a US block. Quote from 1G Racing : 2) It's not built in the UK, it's built in South Africa 3) Apart from the world famous brands already mentioned, 75% of F1, Indy, Cart etc cars are designed in the UK - yes even the Ferraris. The UK is the world leader in advanced automotive design for supercars and track cars. Seventy-five per cent of the world's single-seater racing cars are designed and built in Britain. FACT Ferrari, BMW, Williams, McLaren, BAR, Honda, MB, Toyota - to name just a few You need to get you're head out of your rear, go do your research online, then come back a better informed and less racist and insulting individual IMHO. Check out this review by ROAD & TRACK for the M400 - They end with the following statement: More reviews online HERE They have all had great reviews on Top Gear over the last few years, and looking at them at motorshows, they look very well put together. Chris.

POST 10Original post

There's no disagreement that they have a great level of raw performance at a reasonable price. I've read numerous magazine comparisons of various Noble models versus other sports cars and the Noble has alway faired well. The cars have had their problems during these max performance tests however. I suspect that such low volume, semi custom cars can be expected to have teething problems. Most Noble owners that I have met at the race track have kept things in perspective and have worked through them. Whether or not this represents a Porsche alternative is purely a personal decision. I'm sticking with my Porsches. I have enough problems with my 78SC race car that I don't need to be fiddling with my street car. My kit car comment comes from me being casually informed that the car will need to be registered as a kit car. This of course says littel about the quality of the car since every manufacturer has their own standards. The Shelby Cobra kit cars are a perfect example. There are some very nice ones out there. My friend has one with a Jaguar suspension and 427 under the hood.

POST 11Original post

I've been eyeing them for a while now, they look clean/exotic and with a manageable price tag too.

POST 12Original post

cdodkin, I've got firsthand experience with one at Thunderhill. I wasn't driving, but went for a number of laps in it. The quality was complete crap, no comparison to a P-car or even a Vette. You may not think of it as a kit car, but I've seen homebuilts that were screwed together better. And the performance was good, but not mindboggling like the rags would have you believe (is there any performance car they don't love?). There's a lot of hype around these cars, but the reality is a big let down (and I'm not the GT type, my daily driver is a GT3 with muffler bypass pipes, MPSC's, GT3 seats, etc).

POST 13Original post

Never driven one - have seen them first hand only at motor shows - looked very niocely put together. Trust the guys at TG to review the car well, and find it strange that all the magazines would in some way over state the car's appeal/performance/quality The M400 get's rated above the Ford GT, Ferrari F430, Porsche 911 Carrera S It can't all be BS - there has to be something to make all of these independant reviewers rave about these cars. As for the over generalisations and blatently biased opinions - yep I have them Chris.

POST 15Original post

You believe what you read, I'll stick with firsthand experience. Noble quality is crap...and I'm not the first one to think that. Even some of the car rags have pointed that out too.

POST 16Original post

I stand by what you said. Noble is a kit car quality. I own a Beck's 550 Spyder, they make far more than Noble did, but it is still a kit car. Low volume means (by a small company) it is still a kit car. Kit car quality sucks, they might be fast for a while, but they never last long, and never as reliable as factory cars. also don't forget that being a kit car, means it doesn't have to pass federal crash test, emission test, and bunch of other regulations. oh, have you tried registering a kit car lately. It is very difficult if you want it done "LEGALLY" Look at Lotus, they make tens of thousands, they are great cars, but quality is still not there even with Elise (other than the Toyota engine), even though it is one of the best track car there is. performance, yes. quality, reliability and durability, no !!

POST 17Original post

The other thing to keep in mind is that the cars that get reviewed by the mags aren't plucked from a dealer lot. Noble (and the other small guys) go over them very carefully to make sure they're as close to perfect as they can get (they have to since their whole reputation relies on the free publicity). It's apples and oranges to what you or I would get buying a car from them.

POST 18Original post

I think we'd already decided it was a kit car, and a pile of cr@p because it was British.

POST 19Original post

I instructed a student driving a Noble last summer. For whatever it's worth, the car is fast for sure, but the air circulation within the cab was non-existant. Now, maybe this was a "one off" example, but couldn't see driving this at all in the summer--whew!

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.