fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

These priced too high?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHThese priced too high?

Leading reported evidence

Run 17s

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I ran the 17s on my car one track day, although the tires are somewhat narrow.

These priced too high?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run 17s' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'sizing' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Run 17s' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 13 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 2 other evidence results

sizing

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

I think the problem is the sizing.

These priced too high?

Set with the same offset

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I have an identical set with the same offset.

These priced too high?
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run 17s

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I ran the 17s on my car one track day, although the tires are somewhat narrow.

These priced too high?

Set with the same offset

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I have an identical set with the same offset.

These priced too high?
Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

sizing

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

I think the problem is the sizing.

These priced too high?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T091943Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Or is demand just slower on 2nd set of wheels for 996 owners? https://rennlist.com/forums/market/1168028 Thanks!

POST 3Original post

A huge pet peeve of mine is people who can't spell Boxster.

POST 4Original post

Definitely a good deal! I'd buy them in a heartbeat...if they were the right size and offsets

POST 5Original post

Quotes source post: 16232716

Yep, if you look at all my posts over the years I've corrected the Boxter spellers quite a bit...

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 16232716

thanks! Last time I will mis-spell that one!

POST 7Original post

I got sold similar with good all seasons (read: crappy for summer but OK in spring and fall cooler temps) for $750 cash and carry this past summer. I thought the price was fair.

POST 8Original post

Quotes source post: 16232717

I have an identical set with the same offset. They were apparently the base set of wheels that came on my March 1998 build C2. Not a big surprise to me that they are the same wheels used on the 993, since the 993 was still in production when my 996 was built.

POST 9 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 16234128

I�m pretty sure previous owner just put these on as they aren�t standard wheels. Spacers are required to use them. They do look similar though to the spec wheels. A few experts in the 993 forum think they were standard 996 wheels.

POST 10Original post

Quotes source post: 16235483

My wheels didn't come with spacers. No clearance issues with my calipers. I did note that one edge of my calipers had the paint scraped off and it is possible they were either scuffed or slightly modified many years ago since the wheels only clear that edge by a few millimeters. The wheels do not have any evidence of contact with the calipers. I ran the 17s on my car one track day, although the tires are somewhat narrow. 205 on the front and 255 on the rear, as I recall. I now have a set of the Sport Design and 996.2 GT3 wheels, although I need to roll my rear fender lips to fit the GT3 wheels and tires.

POST 11Original post

I think the problem is the sizing. I know I would be a lot more interested if I could find a winter tire on tirerack for it.

POST 12Original post

Quotes source post: 16237397

Pirelli Sottozero. I'm pretty sure there are sizes that will fit those wheels.

POST 13 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Sorry - to clarify, spacers are only required for my 993 with these wheels. These are standard 996 wheels and no spacers required.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.