7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 C2 jacking points
Leading reported evidence
Use jackstand
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
There is a small reinforced area around that hole that can be used for a jackstand.
Leading evidence: 'Use jackstand' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'bushings, certainly the 8 big links' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace suspect bushings, certainly the 8 big links' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
My plan is to replace all suspect bushings, certainly the 8 big links.
Replace suspect bushings, certainly the 8 big links
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
My plan is to replace all suspect bushings, certainly the 8 big links.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Then replace the very tired Sumitomos, probably with Michelin Pilots.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Been using the reg jack points on the sides, but my car is lowered and an Aero with skirts, so there is not a lot of clearance, unless I purchase a low profile jack.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T203514Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
You can use the spot just forward from where the rear sway attaches to lift the entire rear end. On the front, you can use the bolt location where the torsion arm attaches to the frame. There is also a spot on the tub that's a little forward and in from the jack pad that has a hole like indention. There is a small reinforced area around that hole that can be used for a jackstand.
That is kinda what I saw from underneath.
Been using the reg jack points on the sides, but my car is lowered and an Aero with skirts, so there is not a lot of clearance, unless I purchase a low profile jack.
In addition, I have always preferred to lift from the center line of a car. It doesn't seem like it is possible with a 996, unless I am missing something.
I did a ton of research on this. I found an easy process to lift the car in three steps WITHOUT jacking from the reinforced spot on the engine case.
Some background: I bought my 996 C4S 4 years ago, but I have only put about 4k miles on it. It had great maintenance history despite 150k miles, and the only work needed so far has been a swap of the motor oil and transmission fluid. I did that soon after buying the car, and I couldn't remember much about how I went about it last time. Reading the posts here reminded me that I DID jack on the engine lift point, and didn't damage anything. (At 150k miles, the motor mounts are certainly not original...maybe they are quite new?) I have a lot of tools and experience working on 90s/2000s BMWs, but no Porsche experience.
Here's my process:1. I bought 4 ESCO jack stands from Amazon for $220. Seeing the jack points on the 996 worries me that I would need all kinds of chunks of wood to work with the saddle type and round steel type stands I already have. Annoying and not the safest way. I bought the regular ESCO stands. In hindsight, the low-profile ones are probably better for our cars, but at least I'll be ready any real big job that comes up. The ESCO stands work PERFECTLY with the 996 jack points. I wished I'd bought these a decade ago for all my cars.
2. I bought a 2x10 and cut four 18" long pieces.
3. Using my trusty aluminum "racing" jack from Harbor Freight, I jacked up the car using the right rear jack point.
4. With jack stand on lowest point, slide it under the right front jack point.
5. Slide two 2x10 pieces double-stacked under the right rear tire.
6. Lower the car onto the stand and wood.
7. Repeat on the left side. (side order doesn't matter)
8. With the rear tires 3" off the ground, it's easy to reach the best rear jacking point - the center of the suspension cross member.
9. Lift car enough to get jack stands under both rear jack points.
10. Lower car onto jack stands. Ta-da! That's pretty fast and easy!
11. Slide wood boards out of the way. Remove wheels.
For my suspension project (Ohlins coil-overs), I think I'll have enough room. But if you need to raise the car higher, it's easy now that the wheels are removed. So I suggest always starting with the jack stands in the lowest positions. For the rear, use the center of the suspension cross member (duh!). For the front, you can now get to the reinforced part of the body just inside the front jack point. (This is impossible when the car is on the ground, which makes the Pelican article most useless IMO.) see yellow arrow in figure 1 at link below.
https://www.pelicanparts.com/techart...p_Your_Car.htm
I hope this helps any other 996 newbies in the future. Hard to get far on
DIY
maintenance if you can't get the car in the air!
As for the Ohlins project, I will report back. My plan is to replace all suspect bushings, certainly the 8 big links. Probably replace with stock end links, for now. Then drive car and assess the impact of Ohlins (and new bushes) by itself. Then replace the very tired Sumitomos, probably with Michelin Pilots. Then maybe swap the sway bars also. My pace is glacial due to job and family, so don't expect to hear back for a while.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.