fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

2001 10,000 miles or 2003 41,000 miles

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
6 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH2001 10,000 miles or 2003 41,000 miles

Leading reported evidence

Use car lots

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I remember in my earlier years of innocence (ignorance), I believed the fancy salesmen at the fancy P dealers saying that they get first pick on all the lease returns, hand select the good ones and then send the rest to the local used car lots.

Original post Read captured discussion
2001 10,000 miles or 2003 41,000 miles
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use car lots' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use car lots' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 6 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use car lots

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I remember in my earlier years of innocence (ignorance), I believed the fancy salesmen at the fancy P dealers saying that they get first pick on all the lease returns, hand select the good ones and then send the rest to the local used car lots.

Original post Read captured discussion
2001 10,000 miles or 2003 41,000 miles
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T124918Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Same price both cabs 53,000 take your pick 03 has one year left on fact warn 2001 from porsche dealer cpo.2003 is A lease return at A small car lot.

POST 2Original post

2003 with 41K miles...just because I like the front of hte '03 better...I just converted my 99 to the '02-'04 front

POST 3Original post

hmmmm.....this depends on lots of factors....how many miles a year will you drive it. If alot, then get the 01....if not then lean towards the 03. The other factor is warranty....the CPO warranty is a GREAT thing....drive them bothn thoroughly and get the one that FEELS better to you.

POST 4Original post

Is this a trick question? Screw the miles, the cars are meant to be driven. If these are the ONLY factors to consider (I'm sure they're not idential in every other aspect), I'd go 2003. 3.6 v 3.4, 320HP vs. 300HP, higher insurance premiums...all win, win, win. Also, keep in mind that when you return a vehicle at a car lot, they all have to be returned to the financing company (I'm not sure what Porsche is called) and then they auction off the cars. It's a misconception that where you purchase a car is where the cars were dropped off after the lease term. I remember in my earlier years of innocence (ignorance), I believed the fancy salesmen at the fancy P dealers saying that they get first pick on all the lease returns, hand select the good ones and then send the rest to the local used car lots. Whatever.

POST 5Original post

All things being equal I would certainly get the newer car with higher miles. You don't want a 5 year old car that was driven 2K/year with the older body and interior.

POST 6Original post

Go with the 03. Bigger engine, different look, glass window and don't forget you will get a glove box. Make sure you get the options that you want. $53 not a bad price but not the deal of the century. Good luck, either way not a bad choice

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.