fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Saturday Night Thoughts about DME Reports

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHSaturday Night Thoughts about DME Reports

Leading reported evidence

Use criteria etc

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

This was used for pre-certified used criteria etc.

Saturday Night Thoughts about DME Reports
Frequently discussed work

Replace hands

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

In reality 97% of these cars change hands with no DME reports and less the 1% of vehicles overall change hands with any type of rev range report.

Saturday Night Thoughts about DME Reports
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use criteria etc' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'stop and go car' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace hands' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 14 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 4 other evidence results

Use pre-certified

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

This was used for pre-certified used criteria etc.

Saturday Night Thoughts about DME Reports

stop and go car

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

Probably a stop and go car with 20k miles ....

Saturday Night Thoughts about DME Reports

Replace hands

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

In reality 97% of these cars change hands with no DME reports and less the 1% of vehicles overall change hands with any type of rev range report.

Saturday Night Thoughts about DME Reports

Run report

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Should I get a Durametric/have my indy run a report?

Saturday Night Thoughts about DME Reports
Frequently discussed actions (5)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace hands

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

In reality 97% of these cars change hands with no DME reports and less the 1% of vehicles overall change hands with any type of rev range report.

Saturday Night Thoughts about DME Reports

Run report

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Should I get a Durametric/have my indy run a report?

Saturday Night Thoughts about DME Reports

Run time of close

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

My new (to me) C4S has an average trip of 5.8 miles and an average running time of close to 17 minutes if I recall correctly.

Saturday Night Thoughts about DME Reports

Use criteria etc

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

This was used for pre-certified used criteria etc.

Saturday Night Thoughts about DME Reports

Use pre-certified

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

This was used for pre-certified used criteria etc.

Saturday Night Thoughts about DME Reports
Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

stop and go car

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

Probably a stop and go car with 20k miles ....

Saturday Night Thoughts about DME Reports
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T122219Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

After reading multiple people go back and forth about the DME Report from the GT2 posted on BaT and compare it to a regular 996 regarding what Range and hours and severity, I sit here watching Bruins pregame show while enjoying a macrobrew (Miller High Life, it's the champagne of beers) And I realize I have forgotten so much about gasoline engines to truly understand what the ramifications are of the DME report. For ten years or so, other than my motorcycles, I've driven diesel cars and trucks plus worked in the industry for a few years so I haven't seen a tach north of 4500-5k in a long time. Why is it important? It only seems like it's proactively posted by enthusiast listings but always discussed when a used dealer happens to have a 911. Also what do the hours mean? Hours since occurrence? What triggers it? I get that there are different ranges. If I sit in my driveway and smash my 911 off the rev limiter, will that cause X amount of instances? Is it just the ECU seeing a signal from the tach that can't be possible? Or do I need to "money shift" it to cause an instance in the DME? How common is it? Should I get a Durametric/have my indy run a report? My 911 was used as a daily drive for years hence 130k miles. Ok the Bruins are about to start and I'm on the macrobrew movement board! -G

POST 2Original post

Nine question marks. Looking forward to your answers.

POST 3Original post

I'll bite since I have too much personal knowledge on this. On our cars, I would not worry about the first level of over revs. This is hitting the rev limiter. So to answer your question, if you sat it your driveway, and mashed the throttle, with the car in neutral it would trigger multiple level 1 over revs. 3 over revs for every full rotation of the motor (I believe). The level 2 over revs are the bad ones. This is a mechanical over rev. Something the DME could not protect you against blowing the motor. The person writing this may have triggered 273 level 2 over revs. 70 or so revolutions. I was doing 100 (on the track) and went from 4th to 1st. Car made it 2 more laps, but that 70 revolutions resulted in a connecting rod salad in the sump. So long story short. Lots of level 1 over revs, the owner DROVE the car. Level 2 over revs, you could be lucky depending on how bad, or your day is about to be real bad. The newer cars have several more levels, so the math is a bit different. I don't think you need to be worried until level 3 or so.

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source posts: 16150298, 16150317

I don't have any answers. shrug So just going over the limit isn't a trigger for a single over rev? Every specific revolution of the engine triggers a DME "event?" Am I reading that right?

POST 5Original post

its only necessary on tracked cars imho. gt-2 gt-3 If the information is there why not use it? In reality 97% of these cars change hands with no DME reports and less the 1% of vehicles overall change hands with any type of rev range report. On BAT it is quite simple. nerd on the couch wants to show others online how smart he is by asking for a dme report. Kinda like teaching a baby a new word and they keep repeating it. The people who ask about DME reports NEVER bid on anything and are annoying to me.

POST 6Original post

Quotes source post: 16150331

If you hit the Rev limiter (where the car loses power to save itself) it will register a a level 1. So yes. hitting the rev limiter will register three level ones for every revolution, but the level 2s are the ones that could be bad. All maps to the amount of hours on the motor. If there were dozens or hundreds of hours from the level 2s to current time, things likely could be okay. For instance, my DME currently show 272 leve 2 over revs. Those over revs were fatal to the motor. If I ever sell my car, I will have to show the photos of the blown motor, and the new motor that I installed in the car. The fatal over revs of my motor will always be there (unless I get a new DME). All that being said, I have 200 hours on the DEM since those fatal over revs. Long story short, if lots of hours have passed since the level 2 over revs, you are likely in okay shape, bust still, ALWAYS SPEND TOO MUCH MONEY ON A PPI.

POST 7 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 16150355

Didn't pay for a PPi, took a train 4 hours to my 911 and drove it home 4 hours sight unseen https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...ro-thread.html Did a POST purchase inspection with a really good local indy, didn't mention my DME report, Should I bring it back and ask?

POST 8Original post

From what I have gleaned here if 50 hours have passed since the last type 2 over rev then probably okay.

POST 9Original post

Quotes source post: 16150412

At this point you own the car and the DME report would be for information only. I guess the better question is how would you respond to the information that was in it? If you planned to rebuild if you see any level 2 then sure have it done. If you plan on driving it then don't scare yourself with the dme.

POST 10Original post

I will echo the above...Don't worry about range 1 over-revs unless they are way excessive. For range 2, none is best but if there are some and they occurred a long time ago then if something bad was going to show up resulting from it then probably would have already. If they were very recent I would be more concerned.

POST 11Original post

Quick post as for some miraculous reason my wife and son are still asleep. I look for the usual over revs but also for service hours and times the car has been started. What I do is to divide the miles by number of starts. A car with low miles per start may not be ideal as it probably never got to warm up real well in most circumstances. i.e., saw a very nice 2015 with under 10k which had an average trip of less than two miles. Also, I divide miles by service hours to get a sense for type of driving. Saw a car with an average speed of less that 8 miles. Probably a stop and go car with 20k miles .... or it just sat in the garage warming up before it was driven. My previous 997 had an average trip of 27 which was very consistent with my boss� boss commute. The average speed was low 30s. Had 48k miles but very low cycles and drove like a 10k mile car. My new (to me) C4S has an average trip of 5.8 miles and an average running time of close to 17 minutes if I recall correctly. Average speed in the low 20s. I was able to confirm with previous owner that she drove it across suburbs to work three times a week. Did I mention 0 over revs in 1 or above? Finally on the 991.2, saw a bunch with plenty over revs in 3 (with PDK) but because none on 4 (or above) they where CPO. Here I was able to figure many of these have been tuned and the tune allows for a higher red line. Saw an immaculate one with less than 5k but with almost 3,000 in rev 3 with very high starts and low operating hours. When I asked a bit more identified a previous owner who loved to hit the rev limiter every morning on every light. Car was fine but wonder how that engine will do down the road. The math may no be exact, but there is more to these numbers. They tell you a story. PS. On a PDK they won�t share with you because �it is a PDK and it can not over rev�. Somewhat true by a non modified PDK car should have very few in 1 and less in 2. Never in 3 .... yet many have them. Also, they mostly won�t share the start cycles as most sales guys have no clue. Ask and ask. They will eventually will share.

POST 12Original post

Have a read of this: http://www.911virgin.com/porsche/rev-range-information/ A PPI includes over-rev information - its important to know when it occurred because there is a safe and not safe time - 150 hours post the event the engine is deemed "safe" pre 150 hours the engine is "in danger of failure" according to Porsche techs i've spoken to. This was used for pre-certified used criteria etc.

POST 14Original post

Quotes source post: 16152309

Depends on the model of 996. Which one are you speaking about?

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.