39 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHIs the wing too big?
Leading reported evidence
Clean look
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The cab looks better when it's kept to a simple, clean look.
Leading evidence: 'Clean look' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean look' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
A search will reveal the detailed listing of everything Porsche changed so that you can see if it warrants the price increase.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
39 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T135432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I am thinking about buying this 2001 with 25K but cant decide of the wing is too much. The dealer claims it is a porsche part that was added latter.
Any thoughts?
Looks like a Misha (or original?) GT2 wing
http://content3.us.porsche.com/prod/...usaenglish/gt2
And I think it looks damn cool on any 911. Way better than the taco wing
looks to big looks as if it belongs on a widebody (ie gt2, tt, c4s). Also color looks off a bit maybe me. My .02 fwiw. However like most things if you want it, and look at it long enough it starts to look ok. Beauty is in the eye of the buyer.
I went thru the wing decision earlier this year, to me, the only one that look right on a cab is the t-equiment carrera wing....thats what I ended up putting on....
Personnally I don't like most of the mismatched aerokit combinations, so while I don't find the wing itself bad, I don't like the combination. However as others have said, beauty is in truly in the eye of the beholder/buyer.
I have to agree with a post here on the overall balance and execution of the mods in this car... seems they did not complete the mods... missing a front GT3 or GT2 bumper to complete the looks that they were going for...
Something to worry about is the dealer trying to pass this as a factory part... does not look like a factory GT2 wing.
I would pass unless it is the look that YOU want.... I would look for another car... maybe what they are asking for this car with that wing will get you into an '02... better buy imho...
This is kind of like when your wife asks, "Does my *** look too big in these pants?" You really want to say "Hell, YES!" but you have learned over the years that, in some instances, honesty is NOT the best policy!
But since you are not my wife, then "Hell, YES, that wing is too big for a Cab!"
On the other hand,
Wlee69
, your *** looks good in those pants... er... wait... I meant... that wing looks good on your Cab!
whether you like it or not, use it to reduce the price. How long has the car been on the lot? find out how much it would cost to put the stock lid back on and use that number.
Ok, Ok, the consensus of opinion seems to be a wing this big doesnt go on a c2 cab.
The same dealership just got in this 03 with an interior I like better. My question is this. What changes have taken place from 01 to 03? Glass rear window? Slightly larger engine? The front end looks slightly different. Any other changes of note? Thanks for your help to a newbie
Trust me on this one, but get in the habit of doing a search on the forum before asking questions...especially when the topic has been discussed ad nauseum since 2002 (the year of the update). It'll save you a lot of hassle down the road.
But, yes, you hit all the relatively more important changes. A search will reveal the detailed listing of everything Porsche changed so that you can see if it warrants the price increase. Of course, everyone here will tell you to buy the newest car you can afford.