19 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHTrack Tires?
Leading reported evidence
Use correctly
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Lately though, we have been switching to MPSC's since they seem to last much longer than Hoosiers (and certainly longer than slicks) and only give up a little in grip when used correctly.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'm told they're a bit slower than the Hoosiers (which we use to run), but they supposedly last much longer...i.e., we're getting out of the tire business.
Leading evidence: 'Use correctly' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run )' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'm told they're a bit slower than the Hoosiers (which we use to run), but they supposedly last much longer...i.e., we're getting out of the tire business.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
In our region, we have some very fast drivers who choose to run DE because of personal reasons.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If you are in the higher run groups, then start with R-compounds.
Run pzero's now...and they're okay....i really liked the bridgestone s03's
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Im running the Pzero's now...and they're okay....I really liked the Bridgestone S03's on my M5 as these Pzero's dont seem to grip as much.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Run )
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'm told they're a bit slower than the Hoosiers (which we use to run), but they supposedly last much longer...i.e., we're getting out of the tire business.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Lately though, we have been switching to MPSC's since they seem to last much longer than Hoosiers (and certainly longer than slicks) and only give up a little in grip when used correctly.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
19 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T191851Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
you dont have much choices
DOT r compounds, mpsc and pirelli corsa that's about it.
i am not sure dunlop ssr or yoko advan got the correct sizes for C4s.
What is your experience in this car on the track? If none or minimal I would rec'd the perf street tires (my fav are the Bridge S02's). I tracked for almost 2 years on them to LEARN the car first. If you go straight to MPSC or Corsa's then you won't know your learning curve or the car's capabilities, break points, etc.. But.....if you have plenty experience with the car at the track (the 996) then go with the MPSC or Corsa's.
We are now using the MSPC's. I'm told they're a bit slower than the Hoosiers (which we use to run), but they supposedly last much longer...i.e., we're getting out of the tire business.
Another C4S for the track, arright!!
As stated by Dell, it's a good idea to stick to street tires when you are still early in the DE game. You will learn to drive the car faster because of better techniqu rather than simply better tires. Street tires "talk" to you more about what you are doing right or doing wrong, and have a higher margin for error before you completely lose it.. My favorite street tire for the track is the P-Zero Assimetrico. They have the correct OEM size for the C4S. Tons of dry grip, more than any out there. You can also switch sides easily, since they are assimetric and non-directional, making them usable over a longer period. Don't make the mistake of getting PS2s. The are the best street tires but the worst track tires.
If you are in the higher run groups, then start with R-compounds. The current favorite is the MPSC. Correct tire size, awesome grip, availble anywhere, easily switchable left to right, long life for an R-compound.. Works best if you know what to do about track pressures and alignment.. Corsas are expensive, and are dedicated left/right and not easily switchable. The other tires with the right sizes are the Yoko Advan A048 and the Hoosier slicks. I have no experience with either.
Cheap? Kumho. Dunno if they are any good, 'tho.
I like round tires for all of my track work. I have a race-prepped 924S that performs well on Hoosiers, but when I start to feel the $ pinch on the cost of tires I use anything round and have just as much fun (although the car is not as fast). If your track work does not consist of true competition, but rather is DE or fun track days, you are wasting your money on tires that make your car actually go faster - how would you know that your expensive tires made you faster if you didn't actually beat somebody and win a prize? As recommended by some wise people above, if you are doing DE you should stick to street tires, and I would add, cheap street tires. Tires and brake pads are the most expensive consumable items for track work, and upping your cost on these items will not get you anything unless you plan to win some prize money at your next DE.
BTW, I've actually run my race car at a DE event on snow tires (they were free!). The car handled great, was totally predictable (albeit several seconds a lap slower), and it was comically fun to talk about the tires during bench-racing.
I have to disagree with the thought that DE is not competitive. In our region, we have some very fast drivers who choose to run DE because of personal reasons. That doesn't mean that everyone there is trying to run as fast as possible, it's just that some of us are. For those who are pushing the edge and have enough talent to know the difference, tires are very important. Lately though, we have been switching to MPSC's since they seem to last much longer than Hoosiers (and certainly longer than slicks) and only give up a little in grip when used correctly.
I whole heartedly disagree with using the cheapest tires as you should definitely use tires that are rated for the speed you will be using them. Otherwise, they may catasrophically (sp?) fail.
Not that I'm an expert, but I fully buy into Mitch's thinking.
I've experienced chunking (chunks of rubber coming off the tire after hard sessions on the track) with Pilot Sports. I'd hate to think of what would happen to tires that weren't rated for the task. If I'm taking a high speed turn at 80 mph and the tires are at their limit of grip, the last thing I'd want to think about is whether or not the tires are capable of the task.
Maybe performance rating are just a bunch of marketing hype and I'm just a sucker who fell for it, but I certainly feel safer knowing that I have tires deemed by the manufacturer as suitable for my application.
The new Hoosier R6s seem to last several times as long as the R4s did. I don't think they will last as long as MPSCs but they should be much closer.
Having said that, I think my choice for DE would be MPSC. Plus they have the added advantage of being road worthy for the trip to the track.
Jim
FYI,...if you decide to go with R-compounds, you most likely will not be able to get adequate camber with the stock suspension and will eventually be forced to upgrade that as well,...so keep that in mind.
Im running the Pzero's now...and they're okay....I really liked the Bridgestone S03's on my M5 as these Pzero's dont seem to grip as much. I dont have a ton of experience with this car on the track but, have taken my M5 for a couple years up and down the coast.
Thanks all for the feedback....good stuff!!!
The cups (MPSC's) are good, and I agree with what's been said about longevity and being able to drive them to the track.
The only downside is that they suck for autocross, because they don't get warmed up fast enough to start sticking. Kumhos or some of the others would be better for that. But if you don't autocross, that's not an issue.
=Carlos=
I would no longer contemplate going on the track without track tyres. I use yoko AO48 and they perform much better than street tyres and last much longer under track conditions. When I am driving my pride and joy on the track uninsured I want the best grip possible and IMO that has to be tyres made for that purpose. This is under dry conditions. I avoid the wet.
I have had many a discussion with professional porsche drivers and they all agree that track tyres are a good investment for track days. The other must is high temp brake and clutch fluid.
Track tyres do inspire confidence.
I like the RA1's. Good grip and they last. If you want to save a few bucks get a set of 17" wheels. Comp. sizes in the RA1 17 vs. RA1 18 are about $250 less for a set of 4.
I've got my cups on 17" wheels. The contact patch may be a little smaller, but there's less unsprung weight. And of course, the wheels and the tires both are a lot less $$.
=Carlos=
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.